[sympy] A nice sympy usecase in Latex

2009-03-18 Thread Friedrich Hagedorn
Hallo, on a google-tour I discouvered this site: http://thewikiblog.appspot.com/blog/python-inside-latex May be you know but otherwise it could be interesting four you. By, Friedrich --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed

[sympy] need tensor code

2009-03-18 Thread comer.dun...@gmail.com
I am interested in using Sympy but see on the web page that implementing tensors is rather low on the list of interested additional features. Can the developers give some indication as to when tensor algebra will be added to Sympy? I do general relativity and thus need tensor capability. Thanks

[sympy] Re: A nice sympy usecase in Latex

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Friedrich Hagedorn wrote: > > Hallo, > > on a google-tour I discouvered this site: > > http://thewikiblog.appspot.com/blog/python-inside-latex > > May be you know but otherwise it could be interesting four you. Yes, it's listed as the first link here: http://doc

[sympy] Re: need tensor code

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Comer, On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM, comer.dun...@gmail.com wrote: > > I am interested in using Sympy but see on the web page that > implementing tensors is rather low on the list of interested > additional features.  Can the developers give some indication as to > when tensor algebra will

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009 application

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I created a wiki with our organization applicatio

[sympy] Re: need tensor code

2009-03-18 Thread Alan Bromborsky
Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi Comer, > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM, comer.dun...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> I am interested in using Sympy but see on the web page that >> implementing tensors is rather low on the list of interested >> additional features. Can the developers give some indicatio

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread asmeurer
I saw that sympy did not make it as a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2009 and I will have to apply under the auspices of Python. Will this change any of the requirements that you mentioned above? By the way, I am coming along fine with that Bernoulli patch although it is going s

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:12 PM, asmeurer wrote: > > I saw that sympy did not make it as a mentoring organization for > Google Summer of Code 2009 and I will have to apply under the auspices > of Python. Will this change any of the requirements that you mentioned > above? No, it doesn't change a

[sympy] Re: need tensor code

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Alan Bromborsky wrote: > > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi Comer, >> >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:17 AM, comer.dun...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> I am interested in using Sympy but see on the web page that >>> implementing tensors is rather low on the list of interested

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread asmeurer
OK, if it did it correctly, I sent a patch via git with Bernoulli equations added to the source. By the way, I must say that that guide to git was well written. Good job with that. I was wondering, should the test file be updated with tests for the new types of ODE's that I implement or should

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:18 PM, asmeurer wrote: > > OK, if it did it correctly, I sent a patch via git with Bernoulli > equations added to the source.  By the way, I must say that that guide > to git was well written.  Good job with that. Thanks! > > I was wondering, should the test file be up

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread asmeurer
> The patch will not be accepted without tests, so yes, the tests should > be updated. OK. Is there a way to edit my patch somehow or should I just resubmit? And if resubmit, should I resubmit the whole thing, or just the test? Also, are there any guidelines on tests that I should know about? O

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:03 PM, asmeurer wrote: > >> The patch will not be accepted without tests, so yes, the tests should >> be updated. > > OK.  Is there a way to edit my patch somehow or should I just > resubmit? And if resubmit, should I resubmit the whole thing, or just > the test? > > Als

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread asmeurer
> Just resubmit the patch. You can use > > git rebase -i > > to merge/squash patches. I'll help you with the rest once I can see the patch. I couldn't figure out how to use that command. > Could you please post a link to the message in the sympy-patches list: I don't know how to post a link, bu

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM, asmeurer wrote: > >> Just resubmit the patch. You can use >> >> git rebase -i >> >> to merge/squash patches. I'll help you with the rest once I can see the >> patch. > > I couldn't figure out how to use that command. googling a bit revealed: http://blog.madism.

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread asmeurer
> You go here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches > > click on the first link: > > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches/browse_thread/thread/e11... > > and do copy and paste of that link. That's what I meant. Oop! I thought you meant I could post a link of the patch itself s

[sympy] Re: Google Summer of Code 2009

2009-03-18 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:08 PM, asmeurer wrote: > >> You go here: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches >> >> click on the first link: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches/browse_thread/thread/e11... >> >> and do copy and paste of that link. That's what I meant. > > O