I wouldn't spend too much time on this right now. Once Matt and
Addisons quantum GSoC stuff is merged into trunk, there will be an
entirely new and more formal way of handling all of these things. We
thought quite a bit about how to handle physical parameters of a
system and I think we have a goo
Hello,
I was curious what the roadmap is (if any) for dropping Python 2.4
support? Some features would break compatibility with 2.4, and as such they
need to be delayed until support is dropped.
Thanks. Cheers.
Christian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
I am fine with dropping 2.4 support and even 2.5 support. This makes
moving to Python 3 much easier. For what it is worth, IPython is
dropping 2.4/2.5 support in its next release.
Cheers,
Brian
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Christian Muise
wrote:
> Hello,
> I was curious what the roadmap
I already expounded my position a while back at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/b0103e9ce1301440/ed74f8f8106ac490.
So I will let you just read that if you are interested.
In a nutshell, I am tired of 2.4 and want to drop support already.
On Aug 16, 2010, at 4:37 PM,
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:37:37PM -0700, Brian Granger wrote:
> I am fine with dropping 2.4 support and even 2.5 support. This makes
> moving to Python 3 much easier. For what it is worth, IPython is
> dropping 2.4/2.5 support in its next release.
>
Dropping 2.4 support at this point may
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
> I already expounded my position a while back at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/browse_thread/thread/b0103e9ce1301440/ed74f8f8106ac490.
> So I will let you just read that if you are interested.
>
> In a nutshell, I am tired of 2.4
The recent patches making action verbs got me thinking about fraction
and as_numer_denom and I wonder as we approach 0.7 and the breaking of
backward compatability if we might make a change considering the
following:
- The action verbs make wrappers to common methods in simplify.
- fraction is a v
This was also discussed a bit in issue 1731.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more option
I guess I wouldn't mind seeing all the goodness of GSoC and polys11
being added before dropping support for 2.4. That way, anyone still
using it will have a pretty complete sympy. And then after introducing
that version 0.x immediately introduce a new version 0.x+1 that is 2.4
incompatible. On the
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Øyvind Jensen wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Aug, 18:56, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Øyvind Jensen
>> wrote:
>> > fr., 13.08.2010 kl. 01.17 -0700, skrev Ondrej Certik:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Øyvind Jensen
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Christian Muise
wrote:
> Hello,
> I was curious what the roadmap is (if any) for dropping Python 2.4
> support? Some features would break compatibility with 2.4, and as such they
> need to be delayed until support is dropped.
I am ok with dropping 2.4 too. I wou
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Øyvind Jensen
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13 Aug, 18:56, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Øyvind Jensen
>>> wrote:
>>> > fr., 13.08.2010 kl. 01.17 -0700, skrev Ondrej Certik:
>>> >> On
12 matches
Mail list logo
