Comment #7 on issue 3975 by gupta.ha...@gmail.com: solve(floor (x)-5,x)
should not raise NotImplementedError
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3975
FYI, I started my work on interval arithmetic in
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2682, which was taken over by Matthew
as
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #32 on issue 2096 by skirpic...@gmail.com: 1/0 should be zoo, not oo
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2096
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2813
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #2 on issue 4124 by pramodc...@gmail.com: expand_complex(I*oo)
gives nan
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=4124
Please review this pull request
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2814
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Hi, I'm Harsh Gupta I will be GSOC applicant this year. I want to discuss
the solvers idea given on the Idea's page.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Ideas#solvers
Some of the aspect of the idea are discussed at
According to Wikipedia, the Axiom computer algebra system is licensed as
New BSD.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_%28computer_algebra_system%29
It also claims that it contains Bronstein's original implementation of
Risch algorithm.
Does it mean that the code could possibly be copied and
Concerning bugs and stats, is the following another bug?
In [4]: X = Binomial('X', 4, S.Half)
In [7]: density(X).dict
Out[7]: {0: 1/16, 1: 1/4, 2: 3/8, 3: 1/4, 4: 1/16}
In [8]: P(X 2)
Out[8]: 5/16
In [9]: P(X == 2)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'probability'
I would
== doesn't mean SymPy equality, it means Python equality. Try Eq(X, 3)
instead.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:07 AM, F. B. franz.bona...@gmail.com wrote:
Concerning bugs and stats, is the following another bug?
In [4]: X = Binomial('X', 4, S.Half)
In [7]: density(X).dict
Out[7]: {0: 1/16,
On Tuesday, January 21, 2014 6:37:09 PM UTC+1, Matthew wrote:
== doesn't mean SymPy equality, it means Python equality. Try Eq(X, 3)
instead.
Oh, you're right.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Sachith,
Hi, welcome. Thanks for getting in touch with us. There isn't really
much work going on with the Quantum Computing stuff right now, but
there is definitely a lot to work on. It would require a lot of
initiative on your part though to study the code and come up with good
ideas as to the
May I suggest to pick up a collection of quantum mechanics problems, and
try to solve them using SymPy. I think this is the best way to get a list
of missing features.
By the way, you can also take the code you write to solve specific problems
in order to later create a tutorial.
--
You
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at
we can add new module like area module
On Sunday, 19 January 2014 06:36:28 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
The new year is here, and GSoC is right around the corner.
I've updated some stuff on the GSoC ideas page, including a new idea
relating to the solvers:
I'm not sure if SymPy has much to say in the matter. This strikes me
as entirely NumPy's behavior.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:05 PM, F. B. franz.bona...@gmail.com wrote:
I came across with this strange behavior:
In [1]: o=numpy.array(3, dtype=object)
In [2]: o
Out[2]: array(3,
Great. Keep me updated on the status.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
I take it you started working on this, because I just recieved a ton
of buildbot
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Harsh Gupta gupta.hars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Harsh Gupta I will be GSOC applicant this year. I want to discuss
the solvers idea given on the Idea's
page.https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Ideas#solvers
Great to hear it. As noted on the ideas
Well it's written in Lisp, so copied and translated is not the easiest thing.
But yes, I think this is a good idea, especially for the parts that
are not in Bronstein's book, like the algebraic part of the algorithm.
The implementation in Axiom may very well be the best place in the
literature
Do we know how other computer algebra systems solve this problem? How
robust are the algorithms behind wolframalpha.com ?
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Harsh Gupta gupta.hars...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, I'm Harsh Gupta
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Stefan Krastanov
stefan.krasta...@yale.edu wrote:
Sympy Gamma and Sympy are not the same thing.
Yes, I got to know. Even both of them use the different Plotting logic. I
have gone though the logic.py and resultsets.py file of the sympy_gamma.
Sympy has a
18 matches
Mail list logo
