I just saw the question on my proposal on melange and updated the
answer to it in comment.
Bi Ge
On Thursday, May 2, 2013 1:42:04 AM UTC-4, Bi Ge wrote:
>
> I updated my proposal with benchmarking and sympy-bot, any further
> comments would be appreciated.
>
> Bi Ge
>
>
I updated my proposal with benchmarking and sympy-bot, any further
comments would be appreciated.
Bi Ge
On Monday, April 22, 2013 2:14:47 AM UTC-4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Some comments:
>
> - Anything that cannot be automated should be closely evaluated If
> it's not
I had the same problem yesterday and still can't upload now.
Bi Ge
On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:12:46 PM UTC-4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> It seems to be giving 502: Bad gateway.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Aaron Meurer
> >
> wro
On Sunday, April 21, 2013 1:17:52 PM UTC-4, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>
> Le 21/04/2013 05:11, Bi Ge a �crit :
> > I finished my first draft of application here
> > <
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSOC-2013-Application-Bi-Ge:-Automating-Release-Process-and-Sympy-bot&
I finished my first draft of application
here<https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSOC-2013-Application-Bi-Ge:-Automating-Release-Process-and-Sympy-bot>.
I would love to hear comments from you and others.
And another question is am I addressing enough stuff for a GSoC term?
Especially f
Hi Sympy community,
My name is Bi Ge and I am a third year Computer Engineering student
at Georgia Institute of Technology. My merged patch is
here<https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1869>.
Here is another one <https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1924> (still u
ible. For instance `Sub(f(x).diff(x), x,
> sin**2+cos**2)`.
>
> On 23 March 2013 13:37, Stefan Krastanov >
> wrote:
> > I would say your code gives correct result. Is there a pull request for
> this?
> >
> > On 23 March 2013 01:20, Bi Ge > wrote:
> >
simplify(Subs(x, x, sin(y)**2 +
cos(y)**2)) == Subs(x, x, 1)`.
My code gives the output `1` while `Subs(x, x, sin(y)**2 +
cos(y)**2).doit()`(as the discussion in the link suggests) gives
`sin(y)**2 + cos(y)**2`.
Are those essentially the same?
Regards,
Bi Ge
--
You received this mess
ouble with accessing cls._args
Bi Ge
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:50:52 PM UTC-5, Julien Rioux wrote:
>
> What Stefan writes is good advice for designing classes in general but in
> this particular case, KroneckerDelta being a subclass of Function, we don't
> need to overwrite __new
Sorry I was confused by the cls. The original eval method has 3 inputs(cls,
i, j).
To use ._args I just need to do `cls._args` right?
If so, right now even I reassign it to some other value the class stays
unchanged.
type(cls._args) gives ``
and `print cls._args` gives ``
On Tuesday, March
is the proper way to access the args in eval() method of this class?
I also tried just to return KroneckerDelta(j ,i) when inputs are not in
order but I guess this is sort of hacking and not very pretty (although it
works).
Bi Ge
On Monday, March 4, 2013 2:32:22 PM UTC-5, Stefan Krastanov wrot
e actual inputs stay unchanged.
Is this correct? If so, how should I change them?
Bi Ge
On Sunday, March 3, 2013 1:23:44 PM UTC-5, Stefan Krastanov wrote:
>
> I do not think that the problem here is with your understanding of
> sympy but rather with the way that pythonic variables work.
]
j = sort_args[1]
However, it still gives me the unchanged result such as:
>>>KroneckerDelta(n, m)
KroneckerDelta(n, m)
>>>KroneckerDelta(m, n)
KroneckerDelta(m, n)
I guess I still don't fully understand how symbols work in this function.
Any help will be appreciated.
13 matches
Mail list logo
