Re: [sympy] We should rename 'master' to 'main'

Hi, In general I agree about speech policing - but in this particular case - 'main' is the default in Git now, it is becoming the standard everywhere else - and it's a perfectly reasonable renaming - "main" is a good word for the - er - main branch - at least as good as "master" - semantically.

[sympy] Re: Algrorithm for print order in MatAdd?

Hi, On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:03 AM Matthew Brett wrote: > > Dear team, > > I was trying to display an equation resulting from MatAdd, and noticed > that I could not control the order in which the Matrices appear in the > result. > > For example, consider: > > fr

[sympy] Algrorithm for print order in MatAdd?

Dear team, I was trying to display an equation resulting from MatAdd, and noticed that I could not control the order in which the Matrices appear in the result. For example, consider: from sympy import MatAdd, Matrix A = Matrix([1]) B = Matrix([0]) print(MatAdd(A, B, evaluate=False)) This

Re: [sympy] Help please

The best technique is to strip down the problem to the smallest part that produces the error. In your case, you include this expression: Eq((r1-r3)((1-cos(theta-phi)* ddotphi-sin(theta-phi)*dotphi**2)-2*(r1-r2)*ddottheta,g*sin(theta))) The (r1-r3) produces an Add object, and the parentheses

Re: [sympy] Re: SEPs for SymPy (SymPy Enhancement Proposals)

Hi, On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Bailey wrote: > > On 06/08/2020 00:47, Nicolas Guarin wrote: > > I agree that this would be good for the project but maybe it would be a good > idea to polish the documentation a bit. Some of the pages in the wiki are > somewhat outdated and they are on

Re: [sympy] GSOC applicants sending off-list emails

Hi, Yes, I've often wondered whether it really makes sense to have every potential applicant email the whole mailing list. Perhaps it would be reasonable to have a separate Sympy GSOC mentors list for these emails. Then maybe the applicants could email the list with specific code / design

Re: [sympy] Re: Google Season of Docs Participants Announced

Hi, On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 6:23 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Hi Lauren. We are excited to have you working with us! > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:18 AM Lauren Glattly > wrote: > > > > Hi Sympyers! > > > > Thanks for the introduction Jason! I'm very excited to be participating in > > the

Re: [sympy] Re: SymPy - a suggestion

Hi, Also - I think https://www.sagemath.org has a similar purpose, including a custom notebook for symbolic mathematics, that uses Sympy among other engines. Cheers, Matthew On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:32 PM Aaron Meurer wrote: > > You may also be interested in SymPy Live

Re: [sympy] SymPy - a suggestion

Hi, On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:47 PM David Bailey wrote: > > Hello, > > I used to work as an independent Mathematica consultant, and as such have a > detailed familiarity with their Notebook mechanism. In my opinion Mathematica > notebooks made Mathematica stand out - being able to work with

Re: [sympy] sympy can't solve a system of equations, but maxima can?

Hi, On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:20 AM, wrote: > Hello, > > I'm new to sympy and I'm trying to solve a system of equations, but it isn't > able to find a solution. However, maxima, mathematica, or sagemath find > solutions instantly. > Does anybody know what's wrong? > > x,y

Re: [sympy] Re: Rails Girls Summer of Code 2016,

Hi, On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Harsh Gupta wrote: > Though lack of mentors is a real logistical issue (I can't complain because > I > won't be mentoring this time). We need to recognize the fact that SymPy, > like > most of the other FOSS organizations has a

Re: [sympy] Rails Girls Summer of Code 2016,

Hi, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Sumith 1896 wrote: > Hi all, > > Rails Girls Summer of Code(http://railsgirlssummerofcode.org/) is accepting > Project mentors till the 2nd February 2016. SymPy/SymEngine could apply as a > mentoring organization. > Mentors need to

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

Hi, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 15.07.2015 um 20:54 schrieb AMiT Kumar: Well said, I think, this point won the argument! Actually it didn't, each sentence is easily refuted: Changing the history of your revisions is detrimental to the

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 14.07.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jason Moore: It wasn't ignored, I just don't see it. All I see are detailed agreements or counters to each point that has been mentioned to be negative about rebasing. Indeed, I

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

Completely from the peanut gallery but A humble plea to use the term 'bike-shedding' only in the situation where everyone in the discussion gladly agrees that the discussion is on an unimportant peripheral point. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: This has been debated in a variety of emails, issues, pull requests, chats, and in person over the years. It'd take some time to collect all of those instances for concise review. There is no one authoritative thread that

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, we've had it in wiki for a while and I quoted a previous email that stated it. Yes, sorry not to be clear - I was really wondering out loud whether this was something that was debated fully at the time, I was not at

Re: [sympy] Merging instead of rebasing

Hi, On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I've probably made my position clear before on this, but to restate it: I hate rebasing. You should never do it, and you should absolutely never tell others to do it. Was there some point where y'all agreed on this as

Re: [sympy] sympy will be used at AGACSE 2015 (Applied Geometric Algebra in Computer Science and Engineering 2015) at Barcelona

Hi, On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Alan Bromborsky abrombo...@gmail.com wrote: The problem with merging is not so much the code as the documentation. The current documentation is 77 page pdf document (attached) generated by latex and heavy with equations. I felt since most people are

Re: [sympy] sympy will be used at AGACSE 2015 (Applied Geometric Algebra in Computer Science and Engineering 2015) at Barcelona

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: We can probably ship the documentation as is. It would be nice to be in Sphinx but it isn't a requirement. If we commit the LaTeX source to the SymPy docs folder we can setup a small LaTeX compilation. We already have

Re: [sympy] Installing Sympy Mac OS 10.10.3

Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend installing Anaconda. http://continuum.io/downloads. It already comes with SymPy, it doesn't require any root permissions to install, and you will avoid potentially breaking your system Python, which it

Re: [sympy] What is the fastest way to calculate CDF of T-distribution?

Hi, On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Paul Royik distantjob...@gmail.com wrote: I'm looking for numerical answer. No need to find analytical solution. On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 6:38:29 PM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote: Are you just looking for a numerical answer. The sympy.stats module

Re: [sympy] Re: PR checklist proposal

Hi, On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: [snip] I suspect the bigger problem is to get more reviewing done. I'm feeling that pain myself. I'd like to do more reviewing,

Re: [sympy] GSoC Update

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: I understand that there is no Google mandate on how organizations divvy up their slots. I'm just curious how NumFOCUS plans to handle all of this. From my understanding, Raniere is part of Software Carpentry (which is

Re: [sympy] debian package (to be orphaned)

Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Sergey Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 12:34:08 AM UTC+3, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Policy is that if it's a function that users would expect, it should be depends No, policy is not about this. Don't misguide

Re: [sympy] Re: You received a tip for your commit

Hi, On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Sudhanshu Mishra mrsu...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron (and others!), if you agree, I am going to write them to stop spamming sympy contributors with this. +1 According to the current

Re: [sympy] mpmath missing, installation instructions fail

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: tl;dr: Sergey's unbundle mpmath patches have created a substantial

Re: [sympy] Unbundle mpmath

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: but fortunately there are now pretty good package source managers like Conda or Hashdist, How are they better than pip? I'm not opposed to any of these actually, I just don't know what the differences are. pip

Re: [sympy] Unbundle mpmath

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 04.01.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Matthew Brett: As far as I can see pip has had uninstall since version 0.6, about 5 years ago. The stackoverflow post is someone trying to uninstall using the wrong command line. LOL

Re: [sympy] Re: Release notes in the wiki vs with the source

On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I still prefer having the release notes in the wiki. It makes it easier for people to change them (they don't have to fiddle with pull requests, and it's already hard enough to get people to update them). What are the

Re: [sympy] Re: Release notes in the wiki vs with the source

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: One issue with shipping the changelog in the source is that it will tend to always be in a state of merge conflict. IPython solves this by collecting items that will eventually go in the changelog in a directory of separate

Re: [sympy] A goof-up in symbolic math software

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Richard Fateman fate...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, November 3, 2014 4:56:29 PM UTC-8, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Richard Fateman fat...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, November 3, 2014 1:26:18 AM UTC-8, Joachim Durchholz

Re: [sympy] A goof-up in symbolic math software

Hi, On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Richard Fateman fate...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, November 3, 2014 1:26:18 AM UTC-8, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Am 03.11.2014 um 03:56 schrieb Richard Fateman: There is a difference in the size of the user base and there is a difference in the

Re: [sympy] dmg for Mac ?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Christophe Bal projet...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I've just seen that NumPy and matplotlib proposes a dmg installer for Python 3. This is very usefull. Is there just one dmg for SymPy ? If not, maybe the setup in the source codes of NumPy and matplotlib

Re: [sympy] dmg for Mac ?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Can you point to this discussion? Aaron Meurer On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Christophe Bal projet...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. I've just seen that NumPy and matplotlib proposes a dmg installer for Python 3.

Re: [sympy] dmg for Mac ?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Christophe Bal projet...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Matthew. I've just installed with success using your DMG. Indeed, I've just try import sympy. Is there a way to launch tests ? How about:: sympy.test() Is it hard to do such a DMG ? I'm also interest in

Re: [sympy] dmg for Mac ?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Christophe Bal projet...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, could you send me the code you use to build the DMG ? So - the dmg builds are in two phases: * make an mpkg installer, for each python.org python * change permissions on them * copy them into their own

Re: [sympy] dmg for Mac ?

Sorry - I sent the message too early accidentally: On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Christophe Bal projet...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, could you send me the code you use to build the DMG ? So - the dmg builds

Re: [sympy] trouble installing sympy for windows

Hi, On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Great. Keep me updated on the status. Aaron Meurer On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:37 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [sympy] trouble installing sympy for windows

Hi, On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br

Re: [sympy] trouble installing sympy for windows

Hi, On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: snip Have the authors of conda gone on the distutils mailing

Re: [sympy] trouble installing sympy for windows

Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: This Windows installer is problematic. We are not really able to test it. I think we should probably stop making it. For one thing, it doesn't work everywhere (e.g., you can't make a 64-bit installer unless you are

Re: [sympy] trouble installing sympy for windows

Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: This Windows installer is problematic. We are not really able

[sympy] default_sort_key does not always reproduce behavior of sort()

Hi, I just noticed this: In [38]: a = sympy.Symbol('a') In [39]: b = sympy.Dummy('b') In [40]: sorted([a, b]) Out[40]: [a, _b] In [41]: sorted([a, b], key=sympy.default_sort_key) Out[41]: [_b, a] for sympy versions 0.7.0 through 0.7.3. Sorting without a key raises an error for current

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

Hi, On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Gilbert Gede gilbertg...@gmail.com wrote: I think there were concerns on adding additional arguments to lambdify. That was why I added the dummify flag to the lower-level lambdastr instead, and tried to keep lambdify's interface simple. I think the logic

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

Hi, On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Gilbert Gede gilbertg...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like in lambdify one of the checks for dummification is broken. I'll open a PR in a minute here. The dummification was only supposed to happen on numerical translation though, so modules='sympy' won't be

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

Hi, On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Gilbert Gede gilbertg...@gmail.com wrote: Check out this PR for a discussion of appropriateness of dummification: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1920 Here's the new PR with the correction: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2428 If I understand

[sympy] Symbol sorting raises error - intended?

Hi, I just noticed this in current master (not in 0.7.3): In [4]: from sympy import symbols In [5]: syms = symbols('c, b, a') In [6]: sorted(syms) --- TypeError Traceback (most recent call

Re: [sympy] Symbol sorting raises error - intended?

Hi, On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, this is absolutely intended. Things like if x y: ... no longer work, unless x - y is explicitly known to be negative or nonnegative. This fixes a lot of subtle bugs that pop up, because people will write

[sympy] Help understanding lambdify

Hi, I was trying to debug a problem I was having with lambdify, and I got stuck trying to understand the newish 'dummify' changes. So, it's nice that this works now: from sympy import symbols, lambdify, sin from sympy.utilities.lambdify import implemented_function t = symbols('t') x = sin y =

Re: [sympy] Re: Best practices for Python 2/3 single codebase?

Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I thought PyPI had download counts, but I could only find counts for the package as a whole. I'm pretty sure that GitHub doesn't have any

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: Some docs on it: http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/manual/cfg-statustargets.html#status-GitHubStatus Matthew, do you understand this? I'll need to get up to speed on buildbot before I get it. Sort of. Buildbot has

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: Some docs on it: http://docs.buildbot.net/latest/manual

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I reuploaded the sympy-0.7.3.tar.gz file, and it seems to work now. Excellent thanks - it looks like that solved it, Oh - dear

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I reuploaded the file, but that doesn't seem to have fixed it. The easiest solution is probably to finish up https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2333 and do another release. That's a good long term solution - but it

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hum, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Aaron Meurer Sent from my iPad On Aug 21, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I reuploaded the file

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hum, On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good to me. I can work on it but am not familiar with buildbot. Any quick tips to get me started? Or if it is simple for you

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jason Moore

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: Sounds good to me. I can work on it but am not familiar with buildbot. Any quick tips to get me started? Or if it is simple for you to add then, I'll watch what you add to learn. Here's a first pass:

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks. I wouldn't worry too much about the things that Travis already tests. Given it's more or less free testing for you, I'd humbly recommend you do use the buildbot screen for testing on windows, OSX, different

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: We could setup Travis to test each slow test in a separate build giving up to 50 mins for installation + testing a single test. If the tests are slower than 50 mins, then we can forget them. In the case of mechanics

Re: [sympy] Current master fails in Python 2.6

Hi, On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: That sounds good. Here's what we've tried with Travis: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2225 Happy to move this to something else. Matthew, do you run a buildbot instance already? Yes - here:

Re: [sympy] Lie algebra module

Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, July 30, 2013, Mary Clark wrote: So I've been fixing things to merge with master, and I am a bit confused about some errors that the travis build is giving me. Here is the link to the travis build:

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, can you figure out what the difference is between this version and 0.7.2? Because it works perfectly in 0.7.2, at least for pip

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I did try removing the link to the GitHub releases page. Did that help? No - same as before, I think for the same reason - the order of links on the pypi page: sympy-0.7.3.tar.gz sympy-0.7.3-py3.3.tar.gz Does pip

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I reuploaded the sympy-0.7.3.tar.gz file, and it seems to work now. Excellent thanks - it looks like that solved it, Cheers, Matthew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, I think pip on Python 3.3 is picking up the wrong version of Sympy: http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/nipy-py3.3/builds/4/steps/shell_2/logs/stdio Exploring, this fails with the above error: pip install sympy (for python 3.3) These succeed: pip install sympy==0.7.2 (for python 3.3)

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Ah yes, I knew this would happen. It's because PyPI wouldn't let me upload the same file twice, and I never regenerated a

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I've uploaded a new file, which should fix it. I just untarred the existing tarball and retarred it, which changed the md5. Let me know if it works. Not yet:

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: PyPI shows the file. Maybe pip is caching it? Not the archive at least: (sympy-test2)[mb312@angela ~]$ pip install sympy Downloading/unpacking sympy Downloading sympy-0.7.3.tar.gz (6.4MB): 10% 659kB Thanks,

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Well let me know if it doesn't work by tomorrow or something. Or try in a fresh environment. It is showing up at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sympy for me, and also at https://pypi.python.org/simple/sympy/, which is

Re: [sympy] pip install broken for python 3.3

Hi, On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, can you figure out what the difference is between this version and 0.7.2? Because it works perfectly in 0.7.2, at least for pip. Looking at index.py around 188, it looks like pip is reading and selecting links off

Re: [sympy] Restart Travis

Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: It was just pointed out to me that you can restart a Travis build by clicking on the gear icon in the Travis build page and choosing Restart built. You can also restart individual jobs. I think at this point, Python

Re: [sympy] Restart Travis

Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: It was just pointed out to me that you can restart a Travis

Re: [sympy] Support Python 2 and Python 3 in a single code base

Hi, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I'll ask here what I asked on the pull request. Can you give a list of the things that we would have to do to support both. I'm concerned

Re: [sympy] error in master

Hi, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:51 AM, smichr smi...@gmail.com wrote: Apologies for accidentally committing a bad commit to master. I have two aliases (git dryrun and git reallydoit) that I use when I am adding credits

Re: [sympy] error in master

Hi, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:51 AM, smichr smi

Re: [sympy] error in master

confused. In fact I automate local cloning with : https://github.com/matthew-brett/myconfig/blob/master/usr/bin/forklone.py I have a local branch 'main-master' tracking 'upstream-ro/master' If I do have write access to upstream, the name 'main-master' reminds me that I shouldn't push from there unless

Re: [sympy] Re: Is anyone dying to use these 2.6+ only features?

Hi, On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't looked at it in a while. How easy is it to support the more complicated things like metaclasses with a common code base? Has anyone compiled a list of the trickiest things to support in a common code base?

Re: [sympy] Re: Is anyone dying to use these 2.6+ only features?

Hi, On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote: That is a thorough and well worded response. Thank you. 2.5 often frustrates me but you've just changed my vote. I think we should continue to support 2.5. It seems to be mostly just an inconvenience. This

Re: [sympy] Re: Is anyone dying to use these 2.6+ only features?

Hi, On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: There's also the argument that was raised the last time we talked about this, which is that Python 2.5 is no longer supported at all by the core Python, even for security updates. By the way, the App Engine supports

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Aaron Meurer

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Matthew Brett

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 17, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br

[sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, I've been running into trouble installing sympy with easy_install and pip on python 2.7 and Python 3.3. The fact that easy_install / pip is unlikely to work means that sympy is a considerably heavier burden for our (nipy.org/nipy) users to install, and I'd very much like to help fix that.

Re: [sympy] Consider refactor of testing / benchmarking?

Hi, On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 17, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been running into trouble installing sympy with easy_install and pip on python 2.7 and Python 3.3. What issues with pip are you

Re: [sympy] SymPy 0.7.2.rc1

Hi, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Ondřej Čertík

Re: [sympy] Releasing more often: what needs to be done if you want it to happen

Hi, On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Aaron Meurer

[sympy] Python 3, apt-get, easy_install

Hi, While trying to set up Travis testing for Python 3 and sympy, I noticed that there does not seem to be a current python3-sympy for Ubuntu 12.04, and that easy_install fails with a python 3 syntax error. Testing an sdist archive from the 0.7.2 branch: python setup.py sdist workon python32 #

Re: [sympy] Python 3, apt-get, easy_install

Hi, On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 3, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, While trying to set up Travis testing for Python 3 and sympy, I noticed that there does not seem to be a current python3-sympy for Ubuntu

Re: [sympy] Python 3, apt-get, easy_install

Hi, On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: That looks like it would work. This is our .travis.yml: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/.travis.yml. **Hopefully** when we release, pip install sympy and pip-3.2 install sympy (or whatever the Python 3 pip

Re: [sympy] 0.7.1 hanging on sub of DeferredVector

Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I think the proper fix is to either make DeferredVector an Expr object or give it a _sympy_ method so that sympify() knows how to convert it without resorting to trying to iterate over it. Actually, I see now that

Re: [sympy] 0.7.1 hanging on sub of DeferredVector

Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I think the proper fix is to either make DeferredVector

Re: [sympy] Re: 1.0 * Symbol('x') in 0.7.0

Hi, On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Vinzent Steinberg vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Jul 24, 1:28 am, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote: To me, that inconsistency is a benefit.  Is there some disbenefit? I'm asking honestly.  For me it is just a question of reduced

Re: [sympy] 0.7.1 hanging on sub of DeferredVector

Hi, On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I bisected this to commit f95d0146f59fd9160fe867561fb6620c3a035ad1 Author: Chris Smith smi...@gmail.com Date:   Wed Jun 15 22:15:17 2011 -0500    use ordered_iter and iterable    This reverts commit

Re: [sympy] 1.0 * Symbol('x') in 0.7.0

Hi, On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Simon simonjty...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew, I agree that the x + 0.0 case should be treated the same as 1.0 * x. I think that the Reals/floats should never automatically (outside of possible internal routines) be converted to exact numbers. What happens

  1   2   >