Re: [sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

No, if you are a contributor, you don't need to include it in.mailmap. You just need to sync up the changes in the base branch and your name will reflect back there. On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, 11:06 pm Shishir Kushwaha, < kushwahashishir1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do I need to add my details everytime to

Re: [sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

Refresh your current branch with the master branch and make sure your name is in the mailmap file. On Fri, Feb 2, 2024, 11:06 PM Shishir Kushwaha < kushwahashishir1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do I need to add my details everytime to thee .mailmap file when making a > PR , I did it in my first PR as

Re: [sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

Yes i forgot to sync with the upstream before creating the changes , It is solved now . Thank you for your time and help . On Saturday 3 February 2024 at 04:01:06 UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote: > It's hard to tell from a screenshot. Do you have a link to the PR? > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:36, Shishir

Re: [sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

It's hard to tell from a screenshot. Do you have a link to the PR? On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 17:36, Shishir Kushwaha wrote: > > Do I need to add my details everytime to thee .mailmap file when making a PR > , I did it in my first PR as mentioned in the documentation but when creating > a new

Re: [sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

Is the name and email there the same as the one you added? If you changed the spelling of your name or the email, you have to add another entry to .mailmap. The point of .mailmap is to indicate when two different name/emails are actually the same person. Otherwise, I suspect the issue is that you

[sympy] Doubt Regarding .mailmap file

Do I need to add my details everytime to thee .mailmap file when making a PR , I did it in my first PR as mentioned in the documentation but when creating a new comitt on another issue , the authro test was failing even though my name is there in the file already . Any idea why this could

[sympy] Doubt regarding as_leading_term for multivairate case

Hey guys ! I am working on a Pr based on the as_leading_term() method of core/expr.py (specifically on multivariable cases) . I would be glad if someone could clarify whether (1/x + y).as_leading_term(x) and (1/x + y).as_leading_term(y), both should give back 1/x as the output !! I am not

Re: [sympy] Doubt regarding GSoC ideas

Okay , Thanks! Sudeep Sidhu >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [sympy] Doubt regarding GSoC ideas

We still need to update the ideas list for this year, so some ideas there are no longer relevant because they have already been implemented. For the most part, those are only the ideas for which there were GSoC projects last year, so if that is one of the ideas you are interested in, I would

[sympy] Doubt regarding GSoC ideas

Hi, I have a doubt regarding GSoC ideas. Are all idea present here GSoC Ideas · sympy/sympy Wiki (github.com) are being considered in Sympy's GSoC proposal or some of ideas present there are outdated or not being considered?

Re: [sympy] doubt related to GSoD

I had some similar doubts for writing tutorials or filling missing gaps of docstrings, which I believe is one of the biggest parts of sympy documentations. For example, we have high level documentation ideas in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoD-2020-Ideas. But I'm unsure if the authors

Re: [sympy] doubt related to GSoD

Mohit, The purpose of the program is to engage people that are already technical writers with open source projects and bring in non-developers to open source work. So it's not really a good fit for someone that's trying to learn/start technical writing. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791

Re: [sympy] doubt related to GSoD

Thanks for reply, Actually I don't have any technical writing background. All I have is knowledge in python. I too want to apply, but when I saw that it is necessary to have some experience in it, I became confused whether I can apply or not. What if simeone wants to pursue carrier as technical

Re: [sympy] doubt related to GSoD

The eligibility requirements for the program are at https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/docs/tech-writer-guide. For SymPy, we while we would prefer to have people who have some background in technical writing (either professional or in terms of education), we are open to accepting anyone

[sympy] doubt related to GSoD

Hello everyone, As we all know that GSoD student application period has been started from today. I want to know that can I apply for it even if I have not previously done any technical writer job? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To

Re: [sympy] Doubt.

Amisha, You can start with this document to get familiar: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/introduction-to-contributing Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Amisha Rawat wrote: > I am unable to understand some of the issues in

[sympy] Doubt.

I am unable to understand some of the issues in git link and its very tough to decode it for me but i am familiar with py programming . And sympy excites me same to the same level as numpy did. I am excited to work on it. would someone suggest some easy algorithms to start with. Regards --

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

One more thing, should I debug and implement new algorithms first or refactor the module first? On Thursday, 30 March 2017 04:29:34 UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > You can submit a draft to Google's website, but make sure to also > submit a final version before the deadline. > > It would

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

What about the basic idea? Is it too much or too less or the right amount? Also, my basic idea is rewriting a module. How am i supposed to show implementation part? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2017-Application-Vedarth-Sharma-:-Rewriting-the-Matrices-module-to-make-matrices-in-Sympy-faster-and-more-usable. kindly give me some feedback. I would really appreciate it. I know it is not perfect but it is just a draft right now. Should I submit it to

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

I will submit the draft to you in about 2 hours. Kindly review it and give your feedback. Thanks for your help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Bugfix only projects are allowed, although we have never had one before. You just need to make sure that your proposal is clear enough on what you plan to do, so that it is possible to do the evaluations. Aaron Meurer On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Vedarth Sharma

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Can my project proposal involve fixing a module i.e. fixing bugs? I mean obviously organizing it and rewriting it properly of course. Is it allowed? Or should I do something more? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Doing a pull request that is related to your proposal is always a good idea, if you are unsure what else to do. Aaron Meurer On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Vedarth Sharma wrote: > Definitely. I will contribute more frequently and try to solve more > significant

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Definitely. I will contribute more frequently and try to solve more significant issues. I have been going through sympy's code base and issue tracker for past 3 months, but wasn't able to make any significant contribution because I was busy with my exams (and some other stuff). But now I'll be

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

It does technically fulfill the requirement, but I would suggest doing something more to make your proposal stronger. Aaron Meurer On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:58 AM, Vedarth Sharma wrote: > Done. And it got merged as well :). Does that fulfill my patch requirement or >

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Done. And it got merged as well :). Does that fulfill my patch requirement or do i need to submit a pull request related to my proposal as well? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Just changing the name should work. None of the tests are referenced anywhere else in the code, and all the tests are gathered by the test runner automatically. Be sure to use 'git mv' to change the filename, so that git properly removes the old file and adds the new one. Aaron Meurer On Tue,

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

I would like to submit a patch with changed name of file. Should I just change the name of file or something more is required. Where else do i need to make this modification? Right now sympy.test() doesn't work on matexpr. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Yes, I don't know why that file isn't called test_matexpr.py. We should change it. As for the patch requirement, yes, it means getting a pull request submitted by the application deadline (April 3), and merged soon thereafter. We a little lax on the actual merging deadline, because we know that

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

That was really helpful. Thanks a lot. I made a change to matexpr and was really unsure should i submit a pull request or not because i just couldn't run tests on it. Btw shouldn't the test file follow the same naming convention and same location convention as mentioned in sympy wiki? Another

Re: [sympy] doubt regarding test files

Some files don't have tests, but more likely is that the tests are in another file. In this case, it looks like there is test_matrix_exprs.py. In general, if you make a change to a file in a submodule, like sympy.matrices, I would recommend running the tests for the whole submodule, and any other

[sympy] doubt regarding test files

I noticed that some files like matexpr.py do not have their test files. So I was wondering why is that so? And how are we supposed to run tests on them? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sympy] Doubt regarding an idea mentioned on the ideas page.

Hello, I am Akshay Nagar a GSOC aspirant interested and currently contributing to ODE Solver. My current proposal idea entails the application of Lie groups to second order odes. I have a question though the ideas page mentions about separation ansatz. I read through the research paper

[sympy] Doubt regarding discrete functions

Does Sympy have provisions to do operations on discrete functions? Like fft, dft etc? I was digging into the sympy source code and found out the functions for fourier transform. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this

[sympy] Doubt in editing or adding a new function

I am working on issue for transforming Integral, there is a issue regarding Integral.transform should allow a change to a different variable, so i did some changes in the existing code, but have a doubt Should i edit the existing function or create a new function with different no. of variables

Re: [sympy] Doubt in editing or adding a new function

In the current system Integral(x**2,x).transform(x,2*x) Integral(8*x**2,x) It requires to use the same integration variable, But usually, when we do a transfrom on an integral we change the name of the variable. It should allow something like Integral(x**2,x).transform(x,2*y,y)

Re: [sympy] Doubt in editing or adding a new function

I think since you are adding a new API (i.e., three args instead of two), it should be OK. You can just deprecate the old syntax (which I'm not a fan of either). Aaron Meurer On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:34 AM, arpit goyal agmp...@gmail.com wrote: In the current system

Re: [sympy] Doubt in editing or adding a new function

So, I will deprecate the old syntax, i just want to confirm that this function is not used internally. On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: I think since you are adding a new API (i.e., three args instead of two), it should be OK. You can just deprecate

Re: [sympy] Doubt in editing or adding a new function

https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1232 please review this pull reequest i made for Issue 2846: Integral.transform should allow a change to a different variable. Regards Arpit Goyal On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:25 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote: So, I will