Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-11 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 10.04.2012 10:42, schrieb Ashwini Oruganti: Agreed, that's why I chose it to be data, because we need OO in this framework, else it will be quite tricky to add new rules at a later stage, and since this is a heuristic, this is quite important. I can see how extensibility is strongly pushing

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-10 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 07.04.2012 22:04, schrieb Ronan Lamy: What I said only applies to interface design in Python (it might perhaps be generalised to other dynamically typed object-oriented languages, but no further). My comment

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-08 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 07.04.2012 22:04, schrieb Ronan Lamy: What I said only applies to interface design in Python (it might perhaps be generalised to other dynamically typed object-oriented languages, but no further). My comment applies to interface design in general. My position is that you cannot infer

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-07 Thread Sergiu Ivanov
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Ashwini Oruganti ashwini.oruga...@gmail.com wrot Well, it's too late to change it in the proposal now :-| That's right, but you still can comment on your proposal(s), which does give a bit of flexibility. (At least that's what I hope for :-) Sergiu -- You

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-07 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le vendredi 06 avril 2012 à 22:01 +0200, Joachim Durchholz a écrit : Am 05.04.2012 22:18, schrieb Ronan Lamy: To know whether something should be a function or an object, you need to ask yourself whether it's an action or a thing. Here, we clearly have actions, because the names you use

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-06 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 05.04.2012 22:18, schrieb Ronan Lamy: To know whether something should be a function or an object, you need to ask yourself whether it's an action or a thing. Here, we clearly have actions, because the names you use are verb phrases. I don't know whether you or Ashwini is right about what

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-06 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 05.04.2012 22:18, schrieb Ronan Lamy: To know whether something should be a function or an object, you need to ask yourself whether it's an action or a thing. Here, we clearly have actions, because the names

[sympy] GSOC 2012 proposal

2012-04-05 Thread Saurabh Jha
Hi, Based on various feedbacks, I have tried to improve my proposal and made it more concrete. My proposal can be found at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Gsoc-2012-application--saurabh-jha--implementing-algorithm-to-find-the-limits-of-series More comments to this proposal are most welcome

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-05 Thread Alexey U. Gudchenko
On 04.04.2012 14:05, Ashwini Oruganti wrote: On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Alexey U. Gudchenko pr...@goodok.ruwrote: On 31.03.2012 14:02, Ashwini Oruganti wrote: Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at :

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-05 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le mercredi 04 avril 2012 à 15:48 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 22:52 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : Any more suggestions? With

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-04 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Alexey U. Gudchenko pr...@goodok.ruwrote: On 31.03.2012 14:02, Ashwini Oruganti wrote: Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at :

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-04 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 22:52 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : Any more suggestions? With meaningful names, it's much easier to see how your design could be improved. So: * OperationInfo: the Info part is

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2012 Proposal

2012-04-03 Thread Gaurav Sathe
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 3:25 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Gaurav Sathe gaurav.sath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, David, On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:14 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Gaurav Sathe

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2012 Proposal

2012-04-02 Thread Gaurav Sathe
Hi, David, On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:14 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Gaurav Sathe gaurav.sath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, PFA my proposal for GSOC 2012 for the topic Group Theory . I would really appreciate any suggestions and changes from the

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2012 Proposal

2012-04-02 Thread David Joyner
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Gaurav Sathe gaurav.sath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, David, On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:14 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Gaurav Sathe gaurav.sath...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, PFA my proposal for GSOC 2012 for the topic

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-02 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
Hi, Apologies for the delay in responding; I've been having some network issues, so was off the hook for the past few days. Nevertheless, I noted all your comments, and will update my proposal soon. From what I could understand by Ronan's comments, basically, the methodology has to be more

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-04-02 Thread Aaron Meurer
And be sure to submit the proposal at google-melange.com. The deadline is very close, and you don't want to miss it. Aaron Meurer On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Ashwini Oruganti ashwini.oruga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Apologies for the delay in responding; I've been having some network

[sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal : SymPy for Android

2012-04-01 Thread Rishav Das
Please see: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application--Rishav-Binayak-Das--Mobile-Application-for-SymPy I would appreciate any kind of feedback on my proposal and comments by the community are well-valued. Please let me know what everyone thinks of my proposal and what kind of

[sympy] GSOC 2012 Proposal

2012-04-01 Thread Gaurav Sathe
Hi, PFA my proposal for GSOC 2012 for the topic Group Theory . I would really appreciate any suggestions and changes from the community which would improve the proposal. Please let me know . Thank you. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy

[sympy] GSOC 2012 proposal (Implementing Algorithm for Series Expansion)

2012-04-01 Thread Saurabh Jha
Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at : https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application--Saurabh-Jha--Implementing-Algorithm-for-Series-Expansion Can you please review the same and provide feedback? Thanks and Regards, -Saurabh Jha -- You received this message because

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2012 proposal (Implementing Algorithm for Series Expansion)

2012-04-01 Thread Tom Bachmann
Hi, first of all, I think your title is misleading. Kauer's algorithm (as far as I know) is about computing limits, not expanding series. Then you need to put in much more detail. What limits (specifically!) can be solved with the new algorithm that cannot be done with gruntz, and why? How

[sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-03-31 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at : https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application-Ashwini-Oruganti:-Step-by-Step-Expression-Manipulation Can you please review the same and provide feedback? Thanks and Regards, Ashwini Oruganti -- You received this message

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-03-31 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 15:32 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at : https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application-Ashwini-Oruganti:-Step-by-Step-Expression-Manipulation Can you please review the same and provide feedback?

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-03-31 Thread Ashwini Oruganti
Thanks! :-) Changes made. Any more suggestions? Regards, Ashwini Oruganti On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 15:32 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at :

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-03-31 Thread Ronan Lamy
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 22:52 +0530, Ashwini Oruganti a écrit : Any more suggestions? With meaningful names, it's much easier to see how your design could be improved. So: * OperationInfo: the Info part is obviously meaningless. So what you have a concept of Operation. OK. * GenerateStep and

Re: [sympy] GSoC 2012 Proposal: Step by Step Manipulation

2012-03-31 Thread Alexey U. Gudchenko
On 31.03.2012 14:02, Ashwini Oruganti wrote: Hi, My proposal can be found on the SymPy wiki at : https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2012-Application-Ashwini-Oruganti:-Step-by-Step-Expression-Manipulation Can you please review the same and provide feedback? Thanks and Regards,