Nice, Ondrej! Thanks for spending time on this!
I remember at one point implementing a trivial .doit() to prevent a
crash further up. I was not that familiar with the code at the time, so
I didn't want to mess around with the core. It should ideally be
removed.
Øyvind
sø., 29.11.2009 kl.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know you guys are busy... But do you have an approximate schedule
for when the patches may go into trunk?
Ondrej, do you disagree with the previous posts?
I agree with previous posts. The patches can go in
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know you guys are busy... But do you have an approximate schedule
for when the patches may go into trunk?
Ondrej, do you disagree with the
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know you guys are busy... But do you have an approximate schedule
The failed assertion XYZ should simply be removed. It fails because
of the platform-dependent hash, and is not relevant any more.
It used to be relevant when I tried to use the relation
[[A,B],C] + [[C,A],B] + [[B,C],A] = 0
to enforce a canonical nesting of commutators. I couldn't
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
The failed assertion XYZ should simply be removed. It fails because
of the platform-dependent hash, and is not relevant any more.
It used to be relevant when I tried to use the relation
[[A,B],C] +
Hi,
I know you guys are busy... But do you have an approximate schedule
for when the patches may go into trunk?
Ondrej, do you disagree with the previous posts?
Øyvind
On 27 Okt, 21:54, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
I am fine with this plan. It will be good to get it in.
I disabled the failing doctest and pushed a commit to the branch wick3
in my repo.
I am also extremely busy, so I am afraid I cannot spend much more time
on this right now. It seems though, that from a user perspective, the
missing documentation strings are not that important. And from a
I am fine with this plan. It will be good to get it in.
Brian
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.comwrote:
I disabled the failing doctest and pushed a commit to the branch wick3
in my repo.
I am also extremely busy, so I am afraid I cannot spend much more
Hi,
I don't have time to finish the doctests myself, but on the other hand
I don't want to hold this anymore either. The current status is:
$ bin/coverage_doctest.py sympy/physics/secondquant.py
--
sympy/physics/secondquant.py
I just pushed some of the trivial fixes to github, please pull.
Ondrej, I fixed the 'str' variable as well.
Øyvind
On 15 Okt, 18:54, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.comwrote:
Brian, thanks for your
And another push... I overlooked the substitution Wicks - wicks.
Øyvind
On 18 Okt, 22:51, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
I just pushed some of the trivial fixes to github, please pull.
Ondrej, I fixed the 'str' variable as well.
Øyvind
On 15 Okt, 18:54, Brian Granger
Brian, thanks for your input!
I will make that Exception baseclass, and raise those
NotImplementedErrors. I'll do it the coming weekend.
I really like your idea of implementing the particle/hole stuff on a
higher level, and creating algorithms independent of boson/fermi
formalism. That is a
I implemented lots of doctests, and pushed to my new github account:
git://github.com/jegerjensen/sympy.git
There is still some doctests missing, but I think all the important
stuff is covered.
Øyvind
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
I also got this doctest failure:
___ sympy.physics.secondquant.Wicks
File /home/ondrej/repos/sympy/sympy/physics/secondquant.py, line
2559, in sympy.physics.secondquant.Wicks
Failed example:
Wicks(Fd(p)*(F(q)+F(r)), keepOnlyFullyContracted=True)
Hi,
so I gave it a more thorough look, here is how to play with it:
git clone git://github.com/certik/sympy.git
cd sympy
git checkout -b wick2 origin/wick2
In general I think it looks good and I only have couple minor comments
below, after fixing them, let's commit it, so that it's in and we
Nice!
Here are patches for the quick and easy stuff. They can be applied to
the branch you posted. I also noticed some other small issues, and they
are corrected in the patches.
4) please use explicit imports in the example. Then it would be clear
that the import:
from
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nice!
Here are patches for the quick and easy stuff. They can be applied to
the branch you posted. I also noticed some other small issues,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooops! I have to correct myself:
The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
problems without depending on the number of
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooops! I have to correct myself:
The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
problems without
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alan Bromborsky abro...@verizon.net wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ooops! I have to correct myself:
The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
because of
Yes, I am aware of that. Thanks for your patches, I'll try it and see
where the bottleneck is. Btw in your first patch, you seem to have a
bogus line (with kwargs), which is not used anywhere, unless I am
missing something.
Ondrej
That was indeed an error. It is fixed in this new patch.
Thanks for your swift responses, I've got some comments:
* In various places you use the variable str. This is dangerous as
str is a builtin type (a string).
Absolutely, It should be substituted immediately.
* It is a little awkward to have the occupation #'s stored differently
for bosons
Ooops! I have to correct myself:
The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
problems without depending on the number of particles and the size of
the model space. I believe the framework will be
For what is worth, I also wrote a wick expansion in sympy, see my
wick branch at github:
http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/wick
if you run the t.py script in the root directory, it will save all
the feynman diagrams to /tmp as png images. It only works for scalar
bosons.
Your wicks
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:38 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
For what is worth, I also wrote a wick expansion in sympy, see my
wick branch at github:
http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/wick
if you run the t.py script in the root directory, it will save all
the feynman
I think git send-email doesn't work with gmail. Maybe there is a
workaround, but I never figured it out, so I just send in my patches
manually.
Aaron Meurer
On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:06 AM, Øyvind Jensen wrote:
hmmm...
I tried following the patches tutorial to send in my patches with 'git
Øyvind,
It will take me a while to go through everything, but I just read through
some of it quickly. It all looks quite
powerful and nice. One minor thing and one question:
* In various places you use the variable str. This is dangerous as str is
a builtin type (a string).
* It is a little
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Brian Granger ellisonbg@gmail.com
wrote:
Øyvind,
It will take me a while to go through everything, but I just read through
some of it quickly. It all looks quite
powerful and
Thanks, it sure is great to see your enthusiasm :-)
It turned out I have made two small changes elsewhere in the code, so
I made a total of 4 patches, and I will try to send them in now.
About using the Coupled Cluster example as a unit test: On my laptop
(from 2005) it takes about 2-3
Hey Øyvind,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:07 PM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, it sure is great to see your enthusiasm :-)
It turned out I have made two small changes elsewhere in the code, so
I made a total of 4 patches, and I will try to send them in now.
About using
Hi all,
I have implemented a framework for working with fermionic second
quantization operators with Sympy and I'd like to submit patches for
incorporation in the project.
I have tried to reuse the existing Bosonic framework when applicable,
and have ended up with code that reproduces a lot
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:15 PM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have implemented a framework for working with fermionic second
quantization operators with Sympy and I'd like to submit patches for
incorporation in the project.
I have tried to reuse the existing
Great! I haven't had a chance to work on this for about a year, but Ondrej
and I were just talking last week how it would be nice to push this forward
more.
I have implemented a framework for working with fermionic second
quantization operators with Sympy and I'd like to submit patches
34 matches
Mail list logo
