Re: [Synalist] Synaser and USB serial ports

2008-07-03 Thread Lukas Gebauer
> Hi. I have written a program using Free Pascal / Lazarus which uses > Synaser to communicate with a ham radio via a serial port at > 4800/8/N/2. It is running under Windows XP SP2. When the radio is > connected via a regular serial port it works fine. When connected > using a USB to serial adapte

[Synalist] Synaser and USB serial ports

2008-06-11 Thread Julian G4ILO
Hi. I have written a program using Free Pascal / Lazarus which uses Synaser to communicate with a ham radio via a serial port at 4800/8/N/2. It is running under Windows XP SP2. When the radio is connected via a regular serial port it works fine. When connected using a USB to serial adapter (Prolifi

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Rogers
Mark Rogers wrote: > I'm not ready to take the blame yet, much easier to blame the drivers :-) > OK, time for me to put my hand up... I had a lot of problems. Partly because I was not properly terminating my comms thread while testing the code and that was often leaving the port tied up. Par

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Rogers
Jon wrote: > Ah yes, the good old PEBKAC issue > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebcak). Get's me every time ;-) I'm not ready to take the blame yet, much easier to blame the drivers :-) I mostly use Linux now, so I forget that you can often fix problems in Windows with a reboot! > Seriously tho

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-14 Thread Jon
> > There was definitely something odd going on > but it seems to have passed now. > Ah yes, the good old PEBKAC issue (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebcak). Get's me every time ;-) Seriously though, to check the port names, examine the registry branch: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\HARDWARE\DEVICEMAP\

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Rogers
In addition to what I just wrote in reply to Lukas' email: Jon wrote: > Are you sure that the port is not in use? PortMon is always my first > troubleshooting tool. > If I shut down my software and used the software supplied by the hardware manufacturer (ie the software to talk to the thing

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Rogers
Lukas Gebauer wrote: > No, here are no reason for this. I am using Synaser with USB emulated > serials, I am using it for RS-895 too. > I thought it should be OK, it's nothing particularly unusual. > What exactly is failing? Connect method or Config method? > I can't remember now, because

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-12 Thread Jon
I have used SynaSer successfully with USB serial ports on Windows 95 upwards. No fancy coding, I just followed the basic example. > At the moment I can connect to the real COM1 ok but any > attempts to connect to COM5 are failing (using SysInternals > portmon, it recognises that COM5 exists but w

Re: [Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-11 Thread Lukas Gebauer
> Is there any reason why SynaSer would see the port any differently than > Windows? Any suggestions as to what I can try to find the port? No, here are no reason for this. I am using Synaser with USB emulated serials, I am using it for RS-895 too. What exactly is failing? Connect method or Conf

[Synalist] synaser and USB serial ports

2008-04-11 Thread Mark Rogers
I have a Windows application that needs to work with USB serial ports, which will likely appear as COM5 upwards. At the moment I can connect to the real COM1 ok but any attempts to connect to COM5 are failing (using SysInternals portmon, it recognises that COM5 exists but when I monitor it ther