IAAF has now
posted official start lists on their site.
Those interested
can check out lists (and results over the next week) at http://www.iaaf.org/wjc00/results/
Regards - GT -
http://homepages.go.com/~oztrack/
Now that the season is complete and the IAAF rankings are in for the season.
How much of a difference will their top 10 list be from TFN? The IAAF
formula seems to be weird during the season but it appears to work it's way
out after the season is complete. I was just wondering what some of the
Not to mention the fact that the tracks are harder and faster, the training
more sophisticated, the money is better and the chemists are better now.
Also, many of the athletes who could be Greenes' rivals have chosen to
participate in football, basketball or baseball in which the scholarships
Not to mention the fact that the tracks are harder and faster, the training
more sophisticated, the money is better and the chemists are better now.
Also, many of the athletes who could be Greenes' rivals have chosen to
participate in football, basketball or baseball in which the scholarships
If what's good enough for the goose isn't good
enough for the gander, it's a sure sign of P.C.
run amuck.
Now if people say anybody chasing ANYBODY with a
chainsaw is totally unacceptable, then their
argument has a sound basis, it's not just P.C.
garbage, and I will support them 100%.
Since I started this thread, I'm going to tie it up once and for all. And,
yes, there is still some track and field in this post:
So how should the AWLs feel about Steve Irwin's (Crocodile hunter) Federal
Express commercial which depicts a snakebite from the "most deadliest snike
in the woyld".
Electronic Telegraph
Tuesday 17 October 2000
Tom Knight
REMEMBER Mark Lewis-Francis, the young British sprinter who made such a
sensational breakthrough during the summer, only to opt out of selection for
the Olympics?
His time of 10.10sec for 100 metres at the British Grand Prix in August
"Jack Moran" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian, there's a mistake of some sort in the men's rankings.
Southern Ind was #12 last week, and is both 12 20 this week.
--
From: Brian Kavanaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Track and Field Listserv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: t-and-f: D-II
Bob Hayes
Valery Borzov
These two were dominate (I think...vets help me here:) but competed in
another era. They were on top before the huge jumps in technology for
tracks, equipment and training.
I think that the list is incompete if all we list are athlete since 1980.
But then it becomes
At 01:08 AM 10/17/00 EDT, you wrote:
Mitchell is hard to include as he only had two Bronzes. Does he rank ahead
of Burrell who had two Wr's and indoor WR and WC Silver?
Mitchell did make Oly finals in 88., 92, and 96 (i think).
Burrell would get the edge because he always did it clean
Peter
In a message dated 10/16/00 8:36:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How bout this for an explanation as to why doubles in the 5 and 10 are
rare nowadays.
Here's a flip side of that question:
4/8 and 4/12 doubles at World Cross seem far more common, even though the
races are back to back. Sonia
I would have to agree with Kebba on this one, Carl was the man and had plenty of
competiton even here in the US form the likes of Marsh, Burrell, Mitchell etc. And
have we forgotten that Carl won the deepest 100 final ever CL - 9.86, LB - 9.88, DM -
9.91 and I believe that 7th place was 9.99
Far more common, what? The 4k Junior Varsity race has been run all of three
times?
malmo
4/8 and 4/12 doubles at World Cross seem far more common, even though the
races are back to back. Sonia O even pulled off a double gold a few years
ago. And you'd think running up and down hills and
Gee, I wonder how many men are killed every
year in this country by women, versus how
many women by men? Your scenario wouldn't
reflect reality at all...
Bruce Goodchild
As for political correctness, you can be assured
that there wouldn't be any ruckus at all if
the commercial had shown
Message text written by "malmo"
Ever play the game CLUE? (God forbid you'd ever let your child play that
game with the morbid theme of murder and all!) There's a reason why none of
the weapons is a chainsaw. A chainsaw makes a very poor murder weapon. It's
heavy, it smokes, it's very loud, it's
...what about the Lunn's (John and Jason)...and watch out for the Bairs. Sam
and his now soph son who ran 1:56 last year as a frosh at the Pennsylvania
State meet...the Clarkes of Ausralia? the Powers (Arkansas kid and his
dad?)
- Original Message -
From: Dale Winling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Hayes
Valery Borzov
These two were dominate (I think...vets help me here:) but competed in
another era.
Was Borzov really that dominant? Mo is probably just as much so although his
career is shorter and incomplete. Hayes belongs on any list of greatest
sprinters.
Steve S.
For murder and sin-ridden literature, don't forget the Bible. It's full of
that kind of stuff. However, in the Bible the good triumphs over the evil
in the end - just like in the Nike ad.
And the most horrifying picture shown recently on TV during prime time is
that footage of that
In a message dated 10/17/00 9:55:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 4k Junior Varsity race has been run all of three times?
True, but I'd wager there were more doubles in that time than 5/10's in the
past 3 OG/WCs. Admittedly just a hunch, though.
Jim Gerweck
Running Times
How about a brief time out from the Olympic doping discussion for a
quick trivia question:
Who is Mebrahtom Keflezighi?
Who is Abdi Abdirahman?
Here's a hint: PR = 27:54.81
I have never heard either of these remarkable athletes mentioned on this
forum.
Anybody know anything about their
Darrell wrote:
Such an arbitrary discussion. I think we can pretty much agree that carl
is
the greatest to date. Time will be the only definition for Mo.
As for Ben, he is no where near the top 5, and it has nothing to do with
his
drug bust. He was good sprinter, but that is all. I do
Finally a little conversation on the list ..
Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For college and high school meet results try
http://www.trackmeets.com
For road race results try
http://www.run-time.com
Remember too that there is an aerobic component in the sprints, so
sprinters also benefit from EPO...oops, better leave it at that! Don't
want to cause any more heart problems in the sprint ranks!
Tony Craddock
At 10:51 AM 10/17/00 -0400, Mcewen, Brian T wrote:
EPO was in use at the 1988
You totaly misunderstand what I said. I mean that there are greater numbers
of people competeing from Africa, making the talent pool to pull from much
larger, hence much greater numbers of athletes capable of winning/medaling on
an international scale. In that respect, today is much more
It was a typo,
it should have been
Steve Ovett 35 occurrences place 167
Peter Larsson
-Original Message-
From: Prof. Uri Goldbourt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 16 oktober 2000 15:45
To: Peter Larsson; TrackField mailing List; Conway
Subject: Re: t-and-f: No of total
Here it is, in the shortest/most succinct way I can write it, without
implicating any individuals for drug use:
1) I think we all agree that a 10,000m heat, followed by 2 rest days, and
the 10,000m final at the Olympic Games is stressful (i.e. you are tired/sore
after you complete it). Most of
I am curious as to whether or not any studies have been done that would give
some indication as to the advantages gained by sprinters who use "drugs"
(steroids, EPO, whatever) .. I have been a ware over the years of many
athletes (track and otherwise) that have used drugs and for most there was
Someone in another post talked about
Mo peaking .. I'm not sure how that came about .. Mo just runs fast all the
time .. His one great asset is his ability to always run fast in big meets
(averaging 9.84 in his 3 championship wins) .. But he runs just as fast
elsewhere .. Whereas Most of the
What has happened to Garry Hill?
Is he mad at the list again?
JL
Conway wrote:
Finally a little conversation on the list ..
Conway Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whoa ... "not a great improvement"? Witness the WR of Ben Johnson ... a
time .20 ahead of almost everyone else in history who ran the 100m at
sea-level with fair wind. You guys know that sub-10.00 at sea level used to
be rare. How can you characterize a .20 advantage as "not great"?
And, yes,
Perhaps you'd like to still the chatter, give us some REAL
content, and jump in and tell us when the pending US drug positives are
going to be announced by USATF?
And also name the five US positives in track and field at Seoul that the
IOC's de Merode announced at Sydney who, he said, accounted
OF course!!! What a blatant oversight! Was Martin Kip's actual son by blood
or one of the dozens of children that he had adopted?
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Don Franken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mike fanelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 10/17/00 9:17:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of those scheduled to appear is Maurice Greene. So let's say he goes
half of $1 million. Guess he'd be taking a cut in pay.
My bet is Mo craps out within the first 3 questions, leaving him with what,
about $100?
Jim
In a message dated 10/17/00 1:26:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In '72, '76, and '80 there
were three double golds, and several other notable double medallists, and
high-placing doublers (Viren, Yifter, Puttemans, Shorter, kedir, Maaninka,
Foster).
Jeez, everybody was saying in 72
- Original Message -
Whoa ... "not a great improvement"? Witness the WR of Ben Johnson ... a
time .20 ahead of almost everyone else in history who ran the 100m at
sea-level with fair wind. You guys know that sub-10.00 at sea level used
to
be rare. How can you characterize a .20
They'll surely dumb-down the questions ala Celebrity Jeopardy.
It'll be interesting to see if they choose Olympians with large incomes or
Olympians living on $12K a year who could really use the entire cash prize
rather than sending half to a multi-million dollar charity organization.
Brian says:
Here it is, in the shortest/most succinct way I can write it, without
implicating any individuals for drug use:
Your reasoning makes some sense, but I don't see where you need to have EPO
to make it work. Take EPO out of the equation and just have increasing
event specialization
You omitted one fact.
Christie tested positive for ephedrine at Seoul, but they let him keep
his medal anyway.
And...Ben was NOT busted for 'roids at Seoul. He was convicted
because one man, the late Dr. Manfred Donike, subjectively felt that Ben
had an aberrant endocrine profile - a
Many drugs were available to these competitors during this period ... just
not EPO.
Read the original message and you will see that I never said the spectacular
doubles (and triples) were accomplished without perf. drugs ... I just said
that the drug with the greatest enhancing effect (EPO)
Mo will aggressively win the "fastest-finger" question ... only to embarrass
himself with an inappropriate "victory" celebration for winning $1000.
Normally, you would be correct, he would leave with only $100. But, they
"dumb" the questions down for special episodes ... they did for the
At 10:00 PM 10/17/00 +0200, you wrote:
- Original Message -
Whoa ... "not a great improvement"? Witness the WR of Ben Johnson ... a
time .20 ahead of almost everyone else in history who ran the 100m at
sea-level with fair wind. You guys know that sub-10.00 at sea level used
to
be
1) I think we all agree that a 10,000m heat, followed by 2 rest days, and
the 10,000m final at the Olympic Games is stressful (i.e. you are
tired/sore
after you complete it). Most of us would agree that running any all-out
track 10k is hard on the body. Running two of them is even harder.
Since we're ranking sprinters and a lot of listers place mucho importance on
winning gold medals at OG and WC where does Merlene Ottey fit into the
woman's side of the greatest ever debate? She certainly should be considered
but has always ended up with a "lessor" medal.
Steve S.
Or it could be that winning one gold is worth
more than winning one gold but getting sixth in another race - this reduction
in the number of doubles also coincided with the advent of "above
the table" money.
I think this is a larger factor than I have seen considered in this
discussion. I
Re the coment on the advantage of drugs in sprinting.
Read what Charlie Francis (Johnson's coach) had to say about what kind of
doping it takes in order for you not to be "setting up your blocks 1 meter
behind the rest of the field".
1 m is worth 0.09 seconds for a top level male sprinter
Entry is still open; see www.usatfne.org under cross country for entry info.
B.A.A. and adidas present the
Mayor's Cup Cross Country and Youth Races
Sunday, October 22, 2000
Franklin Park, Boston
BOSTON, Mass. (October 17, 2000) - The trail to crown the country's top
running club ends at
In a message dated 10/7/00 7:57:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How about not having a GP series during Olmpic years? How do you
think
that
would affect the quality of the field and importance of the Olympics?
Or,
since the whole concept of amateurism is pretty moot anyway, pay the
When Stanford runs at full strength with Grant Robison (#1 in front of
Murley at ND) and Don Sage (#3 at ND) plus guys like Jennings they are
going to put up one of the lowest scores ever. It will be a fight between
CU and the hogs. Later, Rolin GO PILOTS
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, mitcca19
A pretty good opening day .. all results, including metric conversions and
lots of news and notes are now at our web site ..
www.nationalscholastic.org
Jim Spier
A pretty good opening day, including a 10.13 by Britain's Lewis-Francis with
neg wind and Kenya's 16 year old Robert Chipchumba running 13:54.8 for his
second 5k in winning the 10k. All day 1 results, including metric
conversions, news, notes and photos are at our web site:
Brian wrote:
Whoa ... "not a great improvement"? Witness the WR of Ben Johnson ... a
time .20 ahead of almost everyone else in history who ran the 100m at
sea-level with fair wind. You guys know that sub-10.00 at sea level used
to
be rare. How can you characterize a .20 advantage as "not
Elliot wrote:
Hold on a sec. here.
Ben Johnson was the only top athlete on dope in 1988?
Ben was running against a clean crowd ? Let's see where this goes ...
And, yes, I attribute Ben Johnson's ability to run that fast to DRUGS.
Without them, he is a 10.15 guy at the very best.
Hello all,
this contribution may be short, since I have only the time left in the
opening ceremony (nice one, BTW, with just enough speed to keep people
interested).
A small first lesson of the championship for me personally: do not get
sick the day before (better now, thanks).
To start, I want
From: "Ed Dana Parrot" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a very pragmatic response, in which I want to support Justin
Clouder. This ad was essentially the most shocking scene out of the
R-rated teen horror flicks.
I can respect those who feel the ad was inappropriate, but let's not overdo
it.
From: Justin Clouder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do you figure that Johnson was only a good sprinter, not a great one?
Given his times and dominance, this position is only supportable if you
argue that he was a good sprinter who became great solely because of drugs.
Thus, by my reckoning, either
I understand what is being said about the increased damage to muscles
and tendons and what not, but wouldn't long term (say 1 year) use of a drug
such as EPO which improves the "engine" as we call it, also, indirectly
improve muscle strength and endurance over time with training. I
--- "Mcewen, Brian T" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there several top men attempting the 4k/12k double each March? I
looked over the results, and watched the TV presentation of last years
race, I don't remember any men doubling successfully.
Goucher? Or do you mean just the world champs?
Geb only did the double once (in 1993, NOT 1995, and he got SILVER in the
5.
Get your facts straight) because it's too damn hard. He had to run his ass
off to beat Tanui in the 10,000 (after Chelimo pushed the pace) and then
had
to come back in the most amazing 5000 of all time. Kirui threw
Conway wrote:
First I'd like to say excellent work by Peter .. As always .. His site is
extremely informative ..
Amen to that!
Regards,
Roger
60 matches
Mail list logo