In a message dated 8/22/00 1:55:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My quick top 10 for NCAA XC this season.
Discuss.
1. Arkansas - sure they lose a lot of dogs up front, but this is Arkansas.
Lots of dogs in the waiting.
2. Stanford - if they recover from the
There aren't many "real" XC courses in the US. Give me a creek to run over
or a downed tree to jump over...that's "real" XC. A lot of college XC
courses are run on what I like to call "grass tracks".
Alan
Get Your
in" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: No XC Please!
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 17:13:42 GMT
There aren't many "real" XC courses in the US. Give me a creek to run over
or a downed tree to jump over...that's "real" XC.
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: No XC Please!
At least the sprint lovers talk about Michael Johnson
and Maurice Greene and Merlene Ottey and Privalova and
Perec and so on.
NOT what Freddie Sprinter is doing setting 10.6 school
records
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: No XC Please!
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:36:37 EDT
I beg your pardon!
Perhaps some relevant x-c discussion and posts are just what this list
needs
in lieu of some of the tomfoolery that permeates this list.
Thank you,
Larry
It is rapidly becoming clear that this request to "hold off on
the XC" will generate more postings to the net about XC than if the
matter had never been brought up.
Dave Carey
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000, Roger Wolff wrote:
Fellow TF Fans,
Please
In a message dated 8/22/00 11:40:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I beg your pardon!
Perhaps some relevant x-c discussion and posts are just what this list needs
in lieu of some of the tomfoolery that permeates this list.
yeah, i agree!
So this guy walks into a bar in Hoboken...
gh
Boulder's sister city, Eugene (part of the "Tie-dyed Triangle" - Eugene,
Boulder, Berkeley), has the same mind-set. University professors (of course)
on zoning commissions and planning boards, promoting their vision of a dense
and "vibrant" downtown, while simultaneously railing against "urban
TECTED]
404.875.3060(p) 404.875.6572(f)
http://www.merrillhall.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 8:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t
]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: No XC Please!
"tomfoolery" that isn't a nice thing to say about the IAAF and the rocket
science they are currently practicing-- "oh let's let Soto off he's a nice
guy and he only got caught twice" :-)
benjamin hall
merrill
On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 10:09:17 -0700, you wrote:
Fellow TF Fans,
Please hold off on the XC. It could be argued that it doesn't belong on this list at
all. The most important TF competition in four years is just around the corner!!
-Roger
I vote it's only okay to talk about XC if it involves
At least the sprint lovers talk about Michael Johnson
and Maurice Greene and Merlene Ottey and Privalova and
Perec and so on.
NOT what Freddie Sprinter is doing setting 10.6 school
records at Podunk College.
Hint:
You'll get the RESPECT of sprint and field event
enthusiasts if you'd just keep
The whining that goes on about cross country is ridiculous. Listen,
collegiate cross country discussions and results are easily just as
important as talk concerning collegiate sprinting, which we see all the
time on this list. What's more, it's ten times better than the endless
junk we have to
13 matches
Mail list logo
