[Tacos-devel] Working demos?

2008-02-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I was wondering if there are any newer/new tacos related demos that people might want to see up and running somewhere? I tried the 4.1 demo a while back but found a lot of b0rken stuff on some of the pages and ditched the effort. -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry / OGNL / Dojo team member/developer

Re: [Tacos-devel] T5 stuff

2008-01-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Tacos-devel mailing list > Tacos-devel@lists.source

Re: [Tacos-devel] [Tacos-changes] SF.net SVN: tacos: [484] tacos-4.0/trunk/tacos-core/src/java/net/sf/tacos/ ajax/components

2007-04-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
ctor with native language (non english) - ability added to specify the local of the DatePicker -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. h

Re: [Tacos-devel] [Tacos-changes] SF.net SVN: tacos: [482] tacos-4.0/trunk/tacos-core/src/java/net/sf/tacos/ services

2007-04-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
gt; > > - > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > >

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos in IE and Firefox

2006-12-14 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
h > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > ___________ > Tacos-devel mailing list > Tacos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tacos-deve

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos tree with lazy loading for children

2006-11-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yes. On 11/12/06, Mittal Bhoigade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andy,collection currentTrans is persisted in session - and treeState is present in collection - do I still have to persist treeState ?ThanksMittal On 11/12/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, the state must also be persisted s

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos 4.0.1 Release

2006-10-30 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
To get things inside ibiblio you have to have a formal agreement with them and go through a lot of red tape-ish kind of things. It's really much easier to try and find someone else larger to publish the jars through. (Like apache, where the jars are synced up with ibiblio via rsync). I'd do a sear

Re: [Tacos-devel] which version of dojo?

2006-10-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos comes bundled with the right version of dojo already (in the downloadable zip as a directory at least, don't know if it's being bundled in the real sense that t4.1 does it yet ), so you shouldn't even have to worry about it. Just download and use the one it gives you. This is also the safest

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tapestry JS Initialization - suspicions and theories - please validate!!

2006-10-18 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I didn't even think about it, but this could probably be made easier by using a friendlier context during those evals..Instead of eval("js string") you can also use eval(context, "js string"). Presumably the context in this case should be window I guess? eval(window, "jsstring") ? Something like th

Re: [Tacos-devel] defaultLinkAction function hangs firefox if AJAX call in flight

2006-10-11 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
If you add in "document.close()" it'll remove that annoying wait cursor as well.On 10/11/06, andyhot <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:andyhot wrote:> nice bug report...>> I'm fixing and redeploying 4.0.1-SNAPSHOT>http://fisheye3.cenqua.com/browse/tacos/tacos-4.0/trunk/tacos-core/src/java/net/sf/tacos/aj

Re: [Tacos-devel] defaultLinkAction function hangs firefox if AJAX call in flight

2006-10-11 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I've fixed the user registration issue by installing the new user reg app as well...The login screen now includes an option to allow users to signup on their own. I don't know how/why it happened (not going to question it too much ;) ), but we also have unlimited users/pages on the account...So, ev

[Tacos-devel] 4.0

2006-09-20 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
The powers that be have applied enough pressure that it looks like I'll be able to tear myself away from 4.1 for a very tiny "bug fixing" triage on the current 4.0 release. I'd like to use the BugReporter app ( http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BugReporter ) to manage all of this. Please make sure all

Re: [Tacos-devel] Dialog should "advertise" itself

2006-09-20 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Any chance you could add this to http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BugReporter ? I'll add it in to 4.0. (along with whatever else seems to be b0rken ) On 9/20/06, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It would be nice if Dialog would "advertise" itself in the IREquestCycle, the way Form, Body,

Re: [Tacos-devel] Autocompleter as PropertySelection

2006-09-05 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
You might want to use the tapestry Autocompleter as that is exactly what it does..Unfortunately I haven't added a documentation page for it yet (shame on me), but it is working fairly well. On 9/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all,   I want to use Autocompleter as Prope

Re: [Tacos-devel] safari support

2006-08-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Ok. Has to be dojo version then. On 8/25/06, Viktor Szathmary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nope, those apps are fine. The Tacos demo isn't, and other apps I haveembedded Tacos4 into are also borked in Safari.   v.On 8/25/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Does this ha

Re: [Tacos-devel] safari support

2006-08-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Does this happen on any of these pages?http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/demos.htmlOn 8/25/06, Viktor Szathmary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,Here's a bug report - I was unable to file this on jotspot (jotspotdoesn't seem to work with safari either, and when using firefox, i gotsome access ri

Re: [Tacos-devel] Validation in AjaxForm

2006-08-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
o disable client-side validation, is there?Thanks, Karthik. On 8/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Sorry this was so painful to implement. If you can get this refresh to hit a specific listener method then you can clear out any server side validation errors by calling:Form.get

Re: [Tacos-devel] Validation in AjaxForm

2006-08-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Hi, Sorry this was so painful to implement. If you can get this refresh to hit a specific listener method then you can clear out any server side validation errors by calling:Form.getDelegate().clearErrors(). If that doesn't work let me know and I'll dig further.On 8/16/06, Zsombor <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos and Tapestry 4.1

2006-08-14 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Now even more with joined hands than ever before! :-DOn 8/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> I don't ~think~ it's a tacos vs tapestry thing (that wouldn't make much > sense ;) ).> After that I'm sur

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos and Tapestry 4.1

2006-08-13 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I don't ~think~ it's a tacos vs tapestry thing (that wouldn't make much sense ;) ). I personally am completely focused on tap 4.1 only right now. Even with that, I don't care as much about the components - yet.. When the time is rightI want each and every feature that comes into 4.1 to be lovin

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxRefresh button?

2006-08-09 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
The new "submitType" parameter on @Submit/LinkSubmit/ImageSubmit/etc now handles binding the _javascript_ calls for you in 4.1. (http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/components/Submit.html )I was going to add the updateComponents/async/etc parameters already on http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestr

Re: [Tacos-devel] we're gonna branch, right?

2006-08-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Branches aren't very hard to make, just do it :)On 8/2/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need to keep using tacos4-beta123456 for the time being, and I mayeven need to make changes to some components there.  At the same time, I want to start moving things over to tap 4.1.  So I am hoping

Re: [Tacos-devel] [Dojo-interest] Connect() vs. addOnLoad() in IE 6 (Tacos broken)

2006-07-31 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Ok, a couple points..-) Cross posting is generally frowned upon. (though I understand being frustrated with something not working)-) dojo.event.connect() not working in version XX of tacos is troubling, but hardly the fault of dojo. (ie if you can get it to work on a plain vanilla html page with do

Re: [Tacos-devel] FW: HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why do the Tacos widgets do it that way!

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
.  The alert doesn't show up. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:46 PM To: Tacos DevelopersSubject: Re: [Tacos-devel] FW: HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why

Re: [Tacos-devel] FW: HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why do the Tacos widgets do it that way!

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Set renderBaseTag to false :) http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/ComponentReference/Shell.htmlAlso, you should probably set parseWidgets to false as well. (It's currently true in your template) On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I added it in a just before t

Re: [Tacos-devel] FW: HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why do the Tacos widgets do it that way!

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Ok, just to test - can you add this to the bottom of your page? dojo.event.connect(window, "onload", function(){ alert(dojo.byId("checkbox"));}); On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Neither onClick nor onBlur have any impact:  still doesn't submit.  -- Jesse KuhnertTa

Re: [Tacos-devel] tap 4.1 questions

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tapestry/ As much as I would like more people to use Tapestry 4.1, if you are under tight deadlines with no room for error upgrading to 4.1 might not be the safest option right now. I can't promise I'll be able to respond to all of your deadline needs

Re: [Tacos-devel] FW: HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why do the Tacos widgets do it that way!

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
What doesn't work exactly? Does this work for you in ie http://opencomponentry.com:8080/tacos/app ?Maybe just do a simple statement like this to be sure: dojo.require("dojo.event");dojo.event.connect(window, "onload", function() { alert('Hello!'); }On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Tacos-devel] HELP: If dojo.event.connect doesn't work for the onload event why do the Tacos widgets do it that way!

2006-07-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I think I meant the opposite. You ~should~ use dojo.event.connect(window, "onload" and ~not~ use dojo.addOnLoad. On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have an email thread that I started on the dojo-interest mail list, below.  Basically I've downloaded the July 10th sou

Re: [Tacos-devel] [Dojo-interest] too many calls to dojo.addOnLoad()?

2006-07-26 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I can't help you with tacos, but if you use Tapestry 4.1 to load your widgets they will all be contained in a single initialization block as the portion of the framework having to do with managing _javascript_ now uses dojo to do these kinds of things. (Yes it does appropriately load things when do

Re: [Tacos-devel] Persisting an object into page

2006-07-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I don't think persist(client) is going to work if you are using tacos. The ajax calls would have to update the entire content area in order to update your links correctly.I would either change persist(client) to persist(session) or specify that the update component in your ajax calls be something t

Re: [Tacos-devel] I want ajax form refresh, but normal submit - Possible?

2006-07-22 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
es me that, even if I could use it.--samOn 7/22/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> It doesn't handle letting you specify json responses (yet), but wouldn't > this give you what you want?>> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/tapestry-annotations/index.html#

Re: [Tacos-devel] I want ajax form refresh, but normal submit - Possible?

2006-07-22 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
It doesn't handle letting you specify json responses (yet), but wouldn't this give you what you want? http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/tapestry-annotations/index.html#EventListener On 7/22/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: anybody?  Buehler?  Buehler?On 7/21/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL P

Re: [Tacos-devel] Tacos @PartialFor question

2006-07-08 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
As long as you don't expect any form values to get updated via your call you should be able to use AjaxDirectLink just fine.In theory I made the FormSupport object for tacos aware if any changes have been made in a request that requires hidden field updates to be made. I can't remember for sure ex

Re: [Tacos-devel] Off Topic: Tapestry Mailing Developer List down?

2006-06-29 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Does this not work? http://tapestry.apache.org/mail-lists.htmlOn 6/29/06, Paul Tongyoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I selected the link to subscribe to the Tapestry Mailing List and I get an 'unknown mailbox' failure notice back to me.  Any one knows if the mailing list is down

Re: [Tacos-devel] Specific Req's on AjaxLinkSubmit.updateComponen ts param?

2006-06-22 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
f any HTML element?  Or must the elements by block elements?  Or @Any components?    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 5:39 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] Specific Req's on AjaxLinkSubmit.u

Re: [Tacos-devel] Specific Req's on AjaxLinkSubmit.updateComponents param?

2006-06-22 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Ahh...This ~might~ be a tiny issue with the @Any component. If you view the html source of your "rendered" page what are the ID attributes of the any tags? You may have to write your @Any components to look like this to get them to work: It's a little annoying I know, and only happens with Any's. .

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:40 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)   Hard to say

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:40 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)   Hard to say at this point. The de

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
  Are there known compatibility issues between Mozilla and IE?       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 3:09 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank"

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (wa s: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Add parseWidgets:false to your djConfig setting as well. (makes render much faster). Also set isDebug:true so that you can see any errors dojo/tacos may be outputting. They both use the same client side logging mechanism. On 6/21/06, Paul Tongyoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wait, didn't notice -- w

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (was: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
TECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 2:33 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (was: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)   You'll know if you included the js correctly if you can hit t

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (was: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
You'll know if you included the js correctly if you can hit that dojo.js file from the url you expect to be able to. (Ie try typing the url into your browser and see if the dojo.js file source gets displayed) On 6/21/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ah, no not in the ca

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (was: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Ah, no not in the case if tacos. There should be some additional dojo _javascript_ call on the page that hooks clicking the AjaxLinkSubmit up to the form. You can see this same behaviour in the currently un-published demo as well: http://opencomponentry.com:8080/tacos/Does the link not work when yo

Re: [Tacos-devel] AjaxLinkSubmit rendering a "blank" HREF value? (was: RE: [Tacos-d evel] Hello Tacos Developers!)

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
x27;d clutter your guys' boxes with trivial, previously-asked questions.  Or at least, I want keep those mails to a minimum. J   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:06 PM To: Tacos Developers Subject: Re:

Re: [Tacos-devel] Hello Tacos Developers!

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
"/" and not any meaningful tapestry URL.  Any ideas?  Please let me know of any other additional information that you need regarding the environment – I'm running Tapestry 4.0.2.   Paul   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jesse Kuhnert Sent: Wedne

Re: [Tacos-devel] Hello Tacos Developers!

2006-06-21 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yes, I hope so :) On 6/21/06, Paul Tongyoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello!  Is this list still active?  J     Paul   All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications inthe hostin

Re: [Tacos-devel] New release

2006-06-19 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
That's awesome Andreas! I've been watching the commit logs, lots of good working going into this release. I wanted to point out a couple things related to what was mentioned below:-) Upload ajax - If you really can't get a response back from an ajax file upload type of request (other than it worked

Re: [Tacos-devel] about ready for a final 4.0 release?

2006-06-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
P.S. I'm not going to be "pushing" for this release to come out, so if you guys want to release it you'll have to decide when on your own ;) On 6/12/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There were some fairly large bug fix changes in the last couple days for th

Re: [Tacos-devel] about ready for a final 4.0 release?

2006-06-12 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
There were some fairly large bug fix changes in the last couple days for the 0.3.1 release, it may be worthwhile checking it out. (even some safari fixes ) On 6/12/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can always grab the latest code from svn, of course.  Given thegeneral instability of '

[Tacos-devel] formatter

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
My memory is dim on this subject, is the formatter being shown in the demo because I took out the custom hivemind dependency?-- Jesse KuhnertTacos/Tapestry, team member/developerOpen source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. _

Re: [Tacos-devel] about ready for a final 4.0 release?

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
r a release...Perhaps the most important of those is to move toa released dojo version (0.3 or 0.3.1) and fix whatever breaks. Unfortunately, I don't think i'll find time to do anythingbefore Tuesday. But after that, I'll have all my time (and not justthe spare one) devoted to ta

[Tacos-devel] about ready for a final 4.0 release?

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
It's been almost a year of betas, so maybe this next one should just be called 4.0 and we'll release it as 4.0.whatever if need be? Also, it looks pretty good right now, should probably think about releasing this one pretty soon. If someone gives me a heads up I can go in and try to make things loo

Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
P.S. New grid stuff is super cool! :)On 6/7/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That did the trick, thanks! On 6/7/06, Jesse Kuhnert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm maybe that's it. I'm doing a build-war . I'll try removing the old webapps deployed dir first to

Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
That did the trick, thanks! On 6/7/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm maybe that's it. I'm doing a build-war . I'll try removing the old webapps deployed dir first to see if it fixes it. On 6/7/06, Sam Gendler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Even after pickin

Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
essage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Sam Gendler> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:25 PM> To: Tacos Developers> Subject: Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally>> I just checked in some significant changes, including mods to the demo... >&

Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
jo version and where the tacos js package files are. On 6/7/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Cool, am updating now. p.s. Don't know if your devs know it or not but idea has a checkstyle plugin as well that would allow them to use the checkstyle.xml file checked in for tacos. O

Re: [Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
ing mods to the demo...--samOn 6/6/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I've found a new home for the demo finally, still working on getting > subdomains working but for now this is where it is:>> http://opencomponentry.com:8080/tacos/app>> --> Jesse Kuhnert>

[Tacos-devel] demo moved finally

2006-06-07 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I've found a new home for the demo finally, still working on getting subdomains working but for now this is where it is:http://opencomponentry.com:8080/tacos/app -- Jesse KuhnertTacos/Tapestry, team member/developerOpen source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind.

Re: [Tacos-devel] svn head looks very exciting! / feature wishlist

2006-06-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
urn type stuff to begin with.) I was thinking a simple IEngineService that invokes things on a hivemind service would make the most sense. Because the ResponseBuilder logic is now integrated into the framework we don't have one central engine managing all of this logic anymore. (Ie AjaxDirect

Re: [Tacos-devel] svn head looks very exciting! / feature wishlist

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
y much if Andy took over managing> this list and getting the right things into jira and assigned to> proper milestones/people etc...but that isn't absolutely needed. > (don't want to sound too bossy ...umm. Please? heh )>> --> Jesse Kuhnert> Tacos/Tapestry, team member/

Re: [Tacos-devel] new components ready to roll (almost)

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Just an FYI the 4.1 JSON stuff is almost exactly like the tacos DojoResponseBuilder (in that it implements a ResponseBuilder interface).The one large difference though is that the engine service (Direct or AjaxDirect in most cases) doesn't control the output type anymore like tacos does (since we h

Re: [Tacos-devel] svn head looks very exciting! / feature wishlist

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
ionality, but I don't have a ton of time to devote to reading source code to figureit out.--samOn 6/1/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Looks great guys! Esp all of the internal java code refactoring that's been > happening. Makes me very happy to know it's im

Re: [Tacos-devel] Still no go

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I haven't played with the fisheye stuff in a very long time. When you load the associated fisheye list test for dojo do you have any problems? (ie http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/tests/widget/test_FisheyeList.html)It could be that the tacos stuff is just out-dated and not working anymore.

[Tacos-devel] svn head looks very exciting! / feature wishlist

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Looks great guys! Esp all of the internal java code refactoring that's been happening. Makes me very happy to know it's improving :) I'm going to be trying to finish up the majority of features by the end of the weekend for tap 4.1 and wanted to know what everyone feels is really crucial to get in

Re: [Tacos-devel] confirm message

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
(!confirm('message')){dojo.event.browser.stopEvent(event); }"> I have tested it on IE and firefox, the request is still send when the user click cancel. Another way I could use to display a confirm message is to use an AjaxEventSubmit. This is true only if I could invoke the generate

Re: [Tacos-devel] Still no go

2006-06-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Try it now Peter. The dojo devs just added a fix that might make your problems go away. You'd have to use a dojo version freshly built from svn though. On 6/1/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I haven't played with the fisheye stuff in a very long time. When you loa

Re: [Tacos-devel] confirm message

2006-05-31 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
An easier method is to use dojo.event.browser.stopEvent(e) to call both event methods. (preventDefault && stopPropogation)On 5/31/06, Charles-André Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Andreas,   Both approch still send the event to the server ! Invoking the preventDefault() is th

Re: [Tacos-devel] component id inconsistent with tacos:table

2006-05-31 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I'm fixing the Any component id issue in the upcoming alpha release for 4.1 fyi. (should be about a week ...cringe)On 5/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not really...Only form components have a getClientId()Perhaps add something similar to all tacos components?And add a @tacos:A

Re: [Tacos-devel] Why isn't dojo defined?

2006-05-26 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Well, do you have the renderBaseTag="ognl:false" on your Shell component? Ie when you do view source on your browser do you see anything in betweeen that mentions base tag ? On 5/26/06, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK. I am now using the 4.0.2 jars in my project, and I get the same er

Re: [Tacos-devel] Why isn't dojo defined?

2006-05-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Aha. Try setting renderBaseTag to false in your @Shell component. (http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/tapestry/ComponentReference/Shell.html )Andy found this a while back and made sure a fix for it was included in the recent tapestry releses. We should probably add this to a FAQ or some other docu

Re: [Tacos-devel] Why isn't dojo defined?

2006-05-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
e to post the contents of the dojo.js, or which file/files are you refreing to. Cheers,PSOn 5/25/06, Jesse Kuhnert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I meant what does the rendered dojo.js script include + configuration part look like. On 5/25/06, Peter Svensson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Thanks for

Re: [Tacos-devel] Why isn't dojo defined?

2006-05-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
>img> a >div> < div id="$FisheyeList4" dojoType="FisheyeList" widgetId="$FisheyeList4" itemWidth="40" itemHeight ="40" itemMaxWidth="80" itemMaxHeight= "80" orientation="vertical" effectUnits=

Re: [Tacos-devel] Why isn't dojo defined?

2006-05-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
What does the rendered page look like when you do view source on your browser ? On 5/25/06, Peter Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi! I'm having a small problem which is driving me up against walls and any furniture not smart enough to get out of the way. I have downloaded tacos 4b2 demo war a

[Tacos-devel] Re: [Dojo-interest] strange dojo undefined error

2006-05-25 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
What does the embedded url to dojo look like in your web app? (ie hit any page and do view source ) Can you hit that url relative to your context root ? On 5/25/06, John Menke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a strange error with dojo initialization.  We have an application that tested fine in QA

[Tacos-devel] Re: Tapestry Ajax Implementation

2006-05-19 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
ly worked for me was to download the demo examples app from tacossourceforge site and copying one example which I severely irritated until itdid what I wanted. The morning espresso haven't cicked in yet, so I can only hope that I'msounding constructive :-|  :)Cheers,PSOn 5/19/06, Jesse

Re: [Tacos-devel] Using ajax engine service for direct rendering

2006-05-17 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Try setting direct = false? I've not run into this problem almost ever, so I'm left scratching my head currently...Unless some new horrible bug has been introduced?On 5/17/06, Ron Piterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,I am trying to create a link which will render *only* specificcomponents on a p

Re: [Tacos-devel] Only for the brave

2006-05-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
read in dojo, but i'm not sure selenium willplay nicely with the command line. Of course i may be wrong, i just don't have the time right now to check + i'm stillwondering who added coverage generation :)From Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> Nice! :) >> If people a

Re: [Tacos-devel] HiveMind SiteMap question

2006-05-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
se bundledwith tacos4-demo jar?-- MárioOn 5/16/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> The same way you do with any other component. Define a SiteMap.jwc /> SiteMap.html and use it.>>> On 5/16/06, Mário Lopes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >> Hi,>

Re: [Tacos-devel] HiveMind SiteMap question

2006-05-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
The same way you do with any other component. Define a SiteMap.jwc / SiteMap.html and use it. On 5/16/06, Mário Lopes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,I'm using Tacos 4 demo as a starting point to initiate the development of an application. That said, I'd like to know where do I change thereference to

Re: [Tacos-devel] Only for the brave

2006-05-16 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Nice! :) If people are feeling brave I might just go in at some point this weekend and update testng/easymock along with a base class and one example of how to test components. On 5/12/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, here it goes, it only includes testng tests...http://andyhot.di

Re: [Tacos-devel] commit protocol?

2006-05-11 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I don't think I've added the js unit test stuff into tacos, but it's available from tapestry4 subversion trunk. Here is the general protocol to follow for any new components/modifications to existing components(ie list applies to public facing changes that people will notice to existing comps or br

Re: [Tacos-devel] [vote] Add Sam Gendler as committer

2006-05-09 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Jesse Kuhnert: +1 (binding)On 5/9/06, Felix Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Good job , Sam, :)Felix Sun: +1 (binding) On 5/9/06, Andreas Andreou <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Sam has already contributed his first component to tacos (Grid),the second one is on the way (DojoTabs) and th

[Tacos-devel] js unit testing

2006-05-08 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I've added an ant task into the tapestry version 4 trunk repo (framework/src/js ) that wraps/packages the dojo unit testing infrastructure in such a way that we can now unit test our own libraries and widgets if we choose. This was done mainly to ease the scaryness of adding all of this additional

[Tacos-devel] JSON tapestry ready for "API" testing

2006-05-05 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
It's pretty much done, at least a very basic starting point. I still need to add a new IEngineService that allows you to invoke a hivemind service listener instead of an IDirect listener (or maybe it'll be the same thing? hmmm).. There is no tacos equivalent of an xml ajax layer yet but JSON should

Re: [Tacos-devel] dojo 0.3

2006-05-05 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I'll do it tomorrow if it's wanted. There isn't very much left to wait for in the 0.3 release besides a few minor bugs (that I think won't affect us overly much). But, I leave it to Andy to decide since he's doing all the development :) On 5/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
hanks.  That helped.  Although I still can't get it to> > > work, I am on to a new bug.  I think I am just minutes away. > > >> > > --sam> > >> > >> > > On 5/4/06, Pedro Viegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > > Close call

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
actuallt displayed.  It is very> > functional, much more so than I have seen of SortableTable.  I'll> > stick a simple demo up somewhere in a few minutes and you can check it > > out.> >> > I am in GMT-8 timezone, although I am frequently in GMT+3, too, and my>

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Oh cool you're using the SortableTable! For _javascript_ + using .script files you shouldn't need to worry about when / where to put it. Tacos captures the script output and makes sure it only gets invoked when it's "safe" from the documents perspective. You'll notice that almost all of the tacos

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
AIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Should I add my dojo widgets to the src/js/dtacos package or create adifferent package?--samOn 5/4/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/4/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BuildingTacos >

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
The wiki is open to editing by guests, but I can give you a real account.On 5/4/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:On 5/4/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:> http://tacoscomponents.jot.com/BuildingTacos>> Don't forget to run "ant fetch-libs

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
a most recent entry of> > nearly a year ago.  Is the trunk currently the latest code, or is that> > in some other branch? > >> > -sam> >> >> > On 5/4/06, Sam Gendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > easy enough> > > > > > On 5

Re: [Tacos-devel] Update tacos:Dialog fields after ajax submit

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
The tacos demo does this and it works. Maybe start there ?On 5/4/06, Jonathan Bullkich <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Has anyone tried this? I can't get it to work. It seems that the widget is not updated with the new html data. Any help would be appreciated.   From: [EMAI

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
on.  These will be the copmonents as > > they are used by our system, so there won't be some weird branch being> > developed within our company.> >> > --sam> >> >> > On 5/4/06, Jesse Kuhnert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >> >> Ind

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
d to is on vacation for the> week), but I can just tar up the source repository and mail it to a> committer for this first version.  These will be the copmonents as > they are used by our system, so there won't be some weird branch being> developed within our company.>> --s

Re: [Tacos-devel] new dojo tapestry widgets

2006-05-04 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Indeed. They sound like great additions that would be welcome. (assuming that they come with documentation/selenium  or other sort of tests/ examples in demo app). If they look like good components and all I'm sure something could be done about commit access. On 5/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL P

Re: [Tacos-devel] Autocompleter Question

2006-05-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Go read up on the component documentation, http://tacos.sourceforge.net/components/Autocompleter.html.Everything you want to do is there. minChars, frequency, etc.. As for filtering a max return size that's sort of up to whatever is providing the "listSource" parameter. On 5/1/06, Pedro Viegas <[E

Re: [Tacos-devel] Autocompleter Question

2006-05-01 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Hmmm...Sounds like a tricky problem. If I had used the dojo ComboBox (which does the same thing) it would be easy to tell you how to do this but with Prototype I'm not sure how you could get a reference to that Autocompleter object. You may have to create the Autocompleter _javascript_ object your

[Tacos-devel] are we ready to move to apache yet?

2006-04-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
It seems like the timing sort of makes sense now. We still have to get approval from tapestry-dev and any other sort of entities, but I don't see why anyone would be against it. The thing is that I don't want to have to manage the process of doing it. There are also a few additional items I'm not s

Re: [Tacos-devel] tacos-changes mailinglist don't show up with very useful information

2006-04-27 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Yep. On 4/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, we all do.I still don't know why we haven't  activated svn:notifyIs it because only viktor can enable it? From  Felix Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> There are no commits changes diff like tapestry-dev 's and the content are a> lot o

  1   2   3   4   5   >