Re: [Tagging] Footway as painted lane in highway

On 27.03.2013 05:18, Steve Bennett wrote: > It sounds essentially like a sidewalk - the only distinction being > that it's not raised above the road surface. So why not just use > footway=sidewalk? > > The footway=lane tag sounds nice, but it sounds like such a rare > occurrence that it will nev

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

What about: amenity=shelter historic=alpine_hut ruins=yes (if appropriate) Volker (Padova, Italy) On 27 March 2013 05:16, Steve Bennett wrote: > Hi all, > Just wondering how best to tag the historic "alpine" huts we have in > the mountains of southeast Australia. Some basic properties: > - us

Re: [Tagging] Footway as painted lane in highway

Hi! 2013/3/27 Tobias Knerr : > footway=sidewalk is not documented used as an add-on tag to > highway=whatever, but for sidewalks which are mapped as separate ways. > In this case, a separate way seems quite clearly not a good choice, > considering that there is no physical separation whatsoever. >

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

Hi! 2013/3/27 Volker Schmidt : > What about: > amenity=shelter > historic=alpine_hut > ruins=yes (if appropriate) Simple. Straight forward. Mostly established tags, besides the value of historic. +1 from me. Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@ope

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

The English/Scottish word for it is "bothy". But it might be better to use something a bit more internationally-intelligible. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > What about: > amenity=shelter > historic=alpine_hut > ruins=yes (if appropriate) > > Volker > (Padova, Italy) >

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

Hi Steve and Volker,> Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:16:13 +0100 > From: Volker Schmidt > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Historic huts > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > What about: > amenity=she

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

2013/3/27 St Niklaas : > Since the hut is situated in Australia, why name it Alpine hut ? I always > thought the Alps to be a European mountain range. In rural uninhabited areas > there will be shelters like it all over the world. well, the alps are in Europe, no doubt, but that doesn't necessari

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

An alpine hut is a hut in high mountains as the alpine climate is a high-mountain climate or an alpine plant is a plant that grows in alpine climates. Alpine hut is used in this sense in OSM. There is even a wine growing area in Australia called Alpine Valleys, if I am not mistaken. :-) Volker On

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

See wikipedia for comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montane_ecology#Alpine_grasslands_and_tundra regards Peter Am 27.03.2013 14:21, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2013/3/27 St Niklaas : >> Since the hut is situated in Australia, why name it Alpine hut ? I always >> thought the Alps to b

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:21:09PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2013/3/27 St Niklaas : > > Since the hut is situated in Australia, why name it Alpine hut ? I always > > thought the Alps to be a European mountain range. In rural uninhabited areas > > there will be shelters like it all over th

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

2013/3/27 Volker Schmidt : > What about: > amenity=shelter > historic=alpine_hut > ruins=yes (if appropriate) looking at the tags maybe historic=wilderness_hut would be better (according to a proposal and the current wiki state, tourism=alpine_hut is for places where you can get food and accomoda

Re: [Tagging] Longitudinal Zebra

On 2013-03-26 15:41, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote : 2013/3/26 André Pirard > Hi, I dig this because of the similar problem with different story and paint. This is the gate in a one-way school service road

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > looking at the tags maybe > historic=wilderness_hut would be better (according to a proposal and > the current wiki state, tourism=alpine_hut is for places where you can > get food and accomodation, while tourism=wilderness_hut is for p

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:14 AM, St Niklaas wrote: > Since the hut is situated in Australia, why name it Alpine hut ? I always > thought the Alps to be a European mountain range. In rural uninhabited areas > there will be shelters like it all over the world. Yeah, that's a bit messy. In Australi

Re: [Tagging] Historic huts

On 28.03.13 06:45, Steve Bennett wrote: > tourism=attraction (to increase the chance that the historic=* actually > renders as something...) Don't tag for the renderer! amenity=shelter by itself renders. Only tag it as a tourism=attraction if it /is/ a tourism attraction. /al ___