Rotating icons didn't used to be possible; maybe it is now (but that's a
feature that isn't available in all renderers, so it's probably better to
use a way, to make the data more usable).
Richard
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> Thanks
>
> "This allows them to be rendered as
Thanks
"This allows them to be rendered as a orientated feature, rather than
just as a node."
I know little of rendering rules, but the French render appears to
rotate node icon to suit
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/?zoom=20&lat=49.01049&lon=8.3876&layers=B000FF
https://github.com/c
Example in OSM default render:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.75352/-1.26340
and my rendering:
http://www.transportparadise.co.uk/busmap/?zoom=3&lat=51.75325&lon=-1.26182&layers=B0FT
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> On 15/07/2015 08:42, Richard Mann wrote:
>
>> I've t
On 15/07/2015 08:42, Richard Mann wrote:
I've taken to adding a way on the alignment of the crossing (with
highway=footway+crossing=traffic_signals as tags). This allows them to
be rendered as a orientated feature, rather than just as a node.
Do you have an example?
I guess the nodes aren't
sent from a phone
Am 15.07.2015 um 00:51 schrieb moltonel :
>> On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote:
>> Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning
>> your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage!
>
> +1
when you're planning to ma
I've taken to adding a way on the alignment of the crossing (with
highway=footway+crossing=traffic_signals as tags). This allows them to be
rendered as a orientated feature, rather than just as a node.
I guess the nodes aren't rendered because otherwise you'd have traffic
light symbols dotted all
