Re: [Tagging] about landcover/landcover=grass

>To me and probably to most, "grass" is not a kind of landuse, meadow would be, median strip would be (or more generally road related vegetation), but the tag has the advantage of leading to one of the desired results Doesnt surface=grass work? Regards

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

Thanks Marc Gemis, I would also suggest the same.But I just don't wish this to be rejected because it isn't included. Cheers ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

I still believe that for the feature at hand it is enough to have amenity=courier, just so we can distinguish it from the traditional postal_office. Do we need subtags for courier yet ? I do not think so. We are mapping supermarkets/convenience stores which offer different products/services for

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

Javbw > On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:50 PM, Tobias Wrede wrote: > > In my area in Germany only the big main "Deutsche Post" offices of a city > have survived. This is true in the US - I have maybe 3 post offices I can think of in 4-5 KM of my old house in San Diego. I

Re: [Tagging] Disaster response

> Similar to public fallout shelters in the US > The closest evacuation center to my house has different “classifications” listed - as in what kinds disasters it is good for. this means if we are tagging evacuation sites - there needs to be some kind of usage/shelter type / disaster type data.

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

> there are even more different kinds of businesses, e.g. in big cities there are often courier services that only operate locally, with cars, bicycles or light motorcycles. It is not clear which kind of courier is addressed with the current proposal and I would also expect the suggestion of

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

sent from a phone > On 24. Apr 2017, at 16:50, Tobias Wrede wrote: > > So, disapproving of amenity/office=courier does not mean I ignore other > countries' traditions and tagging needs. I disapprove because this pair of > post_office and courier would polarize the

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

Am 16.04.2017 um 17:30 schrieb muzirian: >And (speaking as an American), if someone asked me to direct them to a post office, unless they were obviously about to send a parcel, I wouldn't send them to FedEx or the local copy shop (most of which offer shipping services, and some of which also

Re: [Tagging] "Feature Proposal - RFC - (office=courier)"

Am 15.04.2017 um 20:04 schrieb Marc Gemis: As I wrote before, it is not because something does not exists in one country, that one has to vote against a proposal. One has to try to understand that different countries with different traditions and tagging needs. Exactly, but these proposals do

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Bus Bay

Dear all, The bus bay proposal now enters voting stage: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bus_bay#Comments Michael -- Sent from KMail ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - extended voting - through service

Dear all, As there are not enough votes for the proposal, the voting period is extended: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_service Michael -- Sent from KMail ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

Hi Michael, Am 15.04.2017 um 11:14 schrieb Paul Johnson: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Michael Tsang > wrote: I have created a restriction (mandatory route) where if vehicles coming from way must go through a section of a trunk route