Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

2017-09-16 Thread Graeme Fitzpatrick
Looks good Erkin Question, thanks. We have Security Training "schools" (companies to train private security guards) & also Language Schools (usually to teach English to non-English speakers). Would these come under =speciality, or possibly =vocational? Would it be possibly be an idea to also th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

2017-09-16 Thread José G Moya Y .
Hi, Erick. I'm just a newbie in tagging, but I find a reason for keeping school and university at the "amenity" tag. These educative institutions are often easy to spot (they span over an entire building and in many cases they have a campus or playground), while other "education" institutions or b

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

2017-09-16 Thread marc marc
Le 17. 09. 17 à 07:54, Erkin Alp Güney a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_Features/Education_Reform_Alternative +1 for good inventory work https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_Features/Education_Reform_Alternative#Features_not_covered_by_th

[Tagging] Feature Proposals - RFC for multiple features - Education Reform - Magnetic Levitation Trains

2017-09-16 Thread Erkin Alp Güney
Two RFCs by me are ready. One of them are education reform(actually delayed a bit). This brings education key instead of amenity=school. Full proposal at Another is magnetic levitation trains, this one

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Dave Swarthout
>do you mean that for example the tripadvisor website is >often more up-to-date for a POI than the POI website itself ? On second look, my reply is off-topic slightly as this is about the contact:* tags and review websites. I would never tag a review site like YELP or Tripadvisor. But in the case

[Tagging] Fire hydrants split

2017-09-16 Thread Viking
I've splitted the proposal in [1] and [2], as requested. Please help me to check them. In Italian mailing list, it has been proposed the tag cap:wrench=*, because often the wrench needed to open the caps is different from the wrench that opens the hydrant itself. I've added this tag to [2] with s

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Élisée Reclus
Am 16.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb marc marc: > and maybe it makes sense only for review system where you can retrieve > the note from an id. systems where you have to go to their own website > are unusable from an osm search (find a hotel close by with a 4 star review) All three services provide an

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread marc marc
Le 16. 09. 17 à 13:49, Dave Swarthout a écrit : > owners will update the website info as needed do you mean that for example the tripadvisor website is often more up-to-date for a POI than the POI website itself ? AND that tripadvisor website is not enough to have all contact info and it is why y

[Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Élisée Reclus
Tom Pfeifer wrote: > I have seen a few mappers recently adding > contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ] > to businesses. > > IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. While > I personally think > that we do not need them in OSM at all, they certainly do not bel

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Dave Swarthout
marc wrote: "When the poi has its own website website, adding a lot of tag containing the pages that talk about this poi makes no sense and look like seo spam." There are sometimes good reasons to do this, IMO. I like to add the website for hotels and guesthouses because the data consumer then can

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread marc marc
Le 16. 09. 17 à 00:56, Tom Pfeifer a écrit : > I have seen a few mappers recently adding > contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ] > to businesses. it sometimes happens that a small shop does not have a own website. in this case it is useful to add the page of another commercial website contai

Re: [Tagging] contact:* for review websites

2017-09-16 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 16.09.2017 00:56, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. > While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at all, they > certainly do not belong in the contact:* namespace. I agree that these aren't contact channels, and it makes n