This is a tricky issue. I expect not all of them to be happy to publicise
that fact.
We have here in Italy many businesses or amenities that are run by social
cooperatives [1] that employ people with special needs. From the Wikipedia
article it seems that similar forms are common in Belgium.
In It
sent from a phone
> On 12. Apr 2018, at 02:54, John Willis wrote:
>
> You can't nest landuses? We nest every other type of area.
we don’t nest every type of area, for example we don’t nest buildings, nor do
we nest admin boundaries of the same admin level.
cheers,
Martin
sent from a phone
> On 12. Apr 2018, at 02:54, John Willis wrote:
>
> If it is landcover or man_made or a new key like landscaping= or whatever, I
> don't care - but landuse=flower_bed is in defacto use and seems acceptable.
not every use does imply a landuse object of the same specific cla
sent from a phone
> On 12. Apr 2018, at 02:54, John Willis wrote:
>
> A flower park is not a farm either. The purpose of the land is still to grow
> ornamental flowers for enjoying their beauty there.
I thought you also agreed they could be seen as a kind of garden? It isn’t the
only possi
In both cases I encountered, the website clearly states it:
(In Dutch)
http://widar.be/widar/beleven/den-bayerd-het-casino/ clearly states
"people with an handicap"
https://www.mechelen.be/eetcafe-t-ass-2 It mentions people with a
form of autism (it is worded more nicely in Dutch)
there is noth
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 4:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I thought you also agreed they could be seen as a kind of garden? It isn’t
> the only possibility, one might also see them as a kind of park, or maybe
> even a kind of meadow, but my choice, from what I imagine, would be kind of
2018-04-12 7:23 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
> How do you tag a cafe (or any other amenity) that is run as part of an
> outreach project ?
> The cafe is available to everyone, but the employees are part of an
> outreach project (e.g. people with disabilities).
amenity=cafe
social_facility=outreach
?
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> landuses don’t refer to features like a house or a supermarket, they refer to
> a purpose/activity class like retail, residential, industrial or commercial.
Yea, you got me on that one. You are right about the landuse tag being
On 12 April 2018 at 06:23, Marc Gemis wrote:
> How do you tag a cafe (or any other amenity) that is run as part of an
> outreach project ?
amenity = cafe
operator = Foobar
We don't have specific tags for other types of operators (public
company private company, sole trader, cooperative, charity
for the tag : operator:type=ngo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type
for the "publicly available" : for the two establishments of this type I
know, being a "outreach project" is a part of the goal. we also go there
to help the project and not just for the poi itself, so it seems
Marc,
to be clear, if a project clearly advertises it, they indicate they wish it
to be known.
My point was only to be cautious about adding it without having checked
that the project in question wishes this to be known. Unfortunately our
society includes all sorts of weird people. I am German and
So what are you going to use/propose ? landcover or man_made ?
Curious, because I want to correct my mapping.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:01 AM, John Willis wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 12, 2018, at 4:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> wrote:
>>
>> landuses don’t refer to features like a house or a supermark
So I will add
social_facility=outreach (and hope no-one thinks it is only accessible
for people in an outreach group)
operator=Foobar
operator:type:ngo
for now. In case new/better ideas pop-up, feel free to let me know.
m.
p.s. @Volker: I totally understand your viewpoint. I was wondering
mysel
> for the tag : operator:type=ngo
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type
> for the "publicly available" : for the two establishments of this type I
> know, being a "outreach project" is a part of the goal. we also go there
> to help the project and not just for the poi itself, so
NGO is not the correct term.
The Italian social cooperatives are, normally, small companies. That is
much different form NGO [1], I think. In particular they are for-profit
businesses.
My earlier point was that if you put the operator's name in the "operator"
tag, this would, in Italy, normally inc
For the case at hand, it's an n.v (naamloze venootschap). A limited
company. Says nothing at all about the area in which the company
operates.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> NGO is not the correct term.
> The Italian social cooperatives are, normally, small companies. T
sent from a phone
> On 12. Apr 2018, at 11:28, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> So what are you going to use/propose ? landcover or man_made ?
if I had to choose a value for landcover I would use “flowers”, similar to
“trees” or “grass”
cheers,
Martin
___
sent from a phone
> On 12. Apr 2018, at 11:08, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>
> amenity = cafe
> operator = Foobar
>
> We don't have specific tags for other types of operators (public
> company private company, sole trader, cooperative, charity, etc); why
> would we need one in this case?
My tagging
Sometimes bannered routes like business and alternate routes are tagged
with, for example, ref=US 1 Business, spelling it out fully, and other
times they abbreviate it, e.g. ref=US 1 Alt. Which is considered the best
practice? We already abbreviate the US, I, etc., so it's not a stretch to
abbrevia
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Albert Pundt wrote:
> Sometimes bannered routes like business and alternate routes are tagged
> with, for example, ref=US 1 Business, spelling it out fully, and other
> times they abbreviate it, e.g. ref=US 1 Alt. Which is considered the best
> practice? We alrea
20 matches
Mail list logo