Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

+1 On Mon., 15 Jul. 2019, 3:02 am Dave F via Tagging, < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > On 14/07/2019 13:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: > > > > bicycle=designated > > highway=proposed > > > > (from

Re: [Tagging] New entry to the wiki pages leisure soccer golf

On 14/07/19 21:15, Paul Allen wrote: On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 09:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Should this not be tagged leisure=pitch with sport=soccer_golf ??? Or are any sports related to golf to be tagged leisure=* only??? Going by

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - health_amenity:type

This is about the equipment available? Using the principle of 'say what it is' ... medical_equipment=MRI ??? Assuming the tag is for equipment. Calling the key health_amenity:type "in use" is a stretch - 40 uses .. and most of these are for first aid kits! The next most popular is "scales".

Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

On 14/07/2019 13:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Hi all, Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: bicycle=designated highway=proposed (from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335831004) where the "bikes can ride along here" of the first tag is contradicted by the "this

Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

14 lip 2019, 14:07 od rich...@systemed.net: > Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: > > bicycle=designated > highway=proposed > Based on tagging is it a not yet existing road that will have some part designated for use by cyclists (lane/cycleway?). Maybe it will be a cycleway.

Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

14 lip 2019, 14:07 od rich...@systemed.net: > Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: > > bicycle=designated > highway=proposed > Based on tagging is it a not yet existing road that will have some part designated for use by cyclists (lane/cycleway?). Maybe it will be a cycleway.

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

14 lip 2019, 15:26 od dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 14. Jul 2019, at 10:15, Peter Elderson wrote: >> >> From the air you commonly see rows of houses with strips of green in front >> and back, so it would make sense to tag the gardens different than the >>

Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

I'd map the way as highway=cycleway + proposed:highway=*, since until the proposed highway is finished, it's effectivity a cycleway. Adding foot=yes could also be good if relevant. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019, 3:38 PM Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 14. Jul 2019, at 14:07,

[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Utility markers

Hi all, Here is another proposal we were two working on it. It regards several kinds of utility markers usually warning about buried infrastructure beneath them. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Utility_markers_proposal Markers are currently described with keys like

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

That's what I meant. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op zo 14 jul. 2019 om 15:29 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 14. Jul 2019, at 10:15, Peter Elderson wrote: > > > > From the air you commonly see rows of houses with strips of green in > front and

Re: [Tagging] New entry to the wiki pages leisure soccer golf

sent from a phone > On 14. Jul 2019, at 10:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Should this not be tagged leisure=pitch with sport=soccer_golf ??? +1, “soccer golf” seems to be a value suitable for “sport”. It we would want a dedicated tag for the physical place it still should not

Re: [Tagging] Clashing access tags

sent from a phone > On 14. Jul 2019, at 14:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > > 1. Is there any precedent for how to parse these contradictory tags? not sure I follow your analysis that these are contradictory. One could read bicycle=designated as a property (refines a feature), so in this

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Line attachments

Hi all, The voting on the line attachments proposal is now open https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_attachments Proposed tagging regards how any line is bound to its supports. This proposal wasn't intended to describe power insulators only (further work may be done

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

sent from a phone > On 14. Jul 2019, at 10:15, Peter Elderson wrote: > > From the air you commonly see rows of houses with strips of green in front > and back, so it would make sense to tag the gardens different than the > residential area. While I am all in favor of being detailed with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - health_amenity:type

Hi Mark, I agree with your choice to specifiy which service are available in a given facility. This doesn't require to add :type in the name of the key. Such suffixe don't bring any information. Your proposal would be way better if you use health_amenit=MRI at least instead All the best

[Tagging] Clashing access tags

Hi all, Occasionally I encounter tag combinations like this: bicycle=designated highway=proposed (from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335831004) where the "bikes can ride along here" of the first tag is contradicted by the "this hasn't even been built yet" of the

Re: [Tagging] New entry to the wiki pages leisure soccer golf

On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 09:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Should this not be tagged leisure=pitch with sport=soccer_golf ??? > > Or are any sports related to golf to be tagged leisure=* only??? > Going by https://www.worldfootballgolf.com/en/s2106/WFGA/c2243-What-is-Footballgolf it

Re: [Tagging] New entry to the wiki pages leisure soccer golf

Yes, that would be better On Sun, Jul 14, 2019, 10:35 AM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Some 30 uses of the tag leisure=soccer_golf and 2 wiki pages on it - > English and Polish. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsoccer_golf > > > Should this not be tagged

[Tagging] New entry to the wiki pages leisure soccer golf

Hi, Some 30 uses of the tag leisure=soccer_golf and 2 wiki pages on it - English and Polish. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsoccer_golf Should this not be tagged leisure=pitch with sport=soccer_golf ??? Or are any sports related to golf to be tagged leisure=* only???

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

On 14/07/19 16:48, Pee Wee wrote: Op vr 12 jul. 2019 om 09:13 schreef Marc Gemis >: On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Pee Wee mailto:piewi...@gmail.com>> wrote: Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a private wood / forest in a

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

Residential gardens in Nederland, as along as people refer to those as "My front garden" even when completely paved to support one tree-in-a-pot, are leisure things. From the air you commonly see rows of houses with strips of green in front and back, so it would make sense to tag the gardens

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

> > > 1. Has this issue been discussed before and if so … what was the > outcome? > > 2. If not… do you agree with me that private front/back garden > should not be tagged with leisure=garden but with a non-leisure tag? (if > so… any suggestions? And what about private "gardens" that

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

> Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a > private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible > by the public? Do private parking lots get a different amenity-key ? > No, we refine this with additional tags. > This method can be applied to private gardens

Re: [Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

Op vr 12 jul. 2019 om 09:13 schreef Marc Gemis : > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Pee Wee wrote: > > Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a > private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible > by the public? Do private parking lots get a different