Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 167, Issue 3 emergency vertical stairways.

Hi Anne, Have a look here, Not a link but an adress 'Nieuwe Kade 41 Arnhem' The shoreline is made out of corrigated metal sheets, with every now and then a stairway build in. Greetz ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.open

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 166, Issue 10

Hi Camelia, I once tried to mark inundations (flooded areas) for defensive reasons of methodes, since the borders are not very present or alike I stopd the project you wont be able to point the borders accurate. So stick to the markings of roads and pois. dont trie to map area's as "flood danger

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 165, Issue 8, accidental memorials

Van: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org Verzonden: zondag 11 juni 2023 01:08 Aan: tagging@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Tagging Digest, Vol 165, Issue 8 Send Tagging mailing list submissions to tagging@openstreetmap.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 164, Issue 10

Hi there, Most invalid parking spaces are marked with a traffic sign, accordingly those space will be sufficient of width and length. There is not much need to measure it like I do using several measurement tools. OSM is still a better map by making surveys, locally but by using arials it is not

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 156, Issue 68 Seats or capacity ?

Hi Anne, By lack of friends use your elbows they wont mind. A seat with friends is 0.50 m closely of cosey. With a 'normal' format of strangers its about 0.60 the length of the top of your stretch fingers up to the backside of your elbow. But an estimated guess would do as well or the size of t

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 156, Issue 25, surface; concrete

Hi John, Is not it just right to use concrete if your not able to determine what kind of surface your looking at ? Or should we talk with developers of these kind of programms that they should do more research before the programs are excepted to use for edits in OSM ? If you work with JOSM, it i

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 134, Issue 130 animal tracks ?

Hi everyone, I react on the notes of Graeme, There are a lot of things to map, but Animal trails or nature tracks are not the high items to map and if as suggested that they are found on areal views, I find that a good argument to stop using views without surveying locally and outside for a clo

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 133, Issue 35 man-made

Hi Martin & members, Besides the frequently named bridge, there are several oil / petroleum wells in the same category man-made. I reccon no one has ever counted them, you could Fill the Albert Hall with them. In my humble opinion its a not very well thought idea and the describtion of the old E

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 133, Issue 10 message 3

Hi Greame, Manure, specially from horses, seems to be very healthy for roserays. I even have bought some from cows in the past. In 2 options get it delivered or take it away in your booth of the car. 😊 The direct delivery stands could evaluate into a so called automatic pay and open the box by t

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 133, Issue 2

Hi Wieland, Whats wrong with shop=farm, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.05459/5.15648 This is not the only one and they all are mraked with a sign or a flag or alike, with different products. Up till even meat, eggs and milk. So whats the advantage of a new tag besides shop ? Greetz __

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 132, Issue 77

Hi Lukas, Since the green energy is transported by the present transport facility and even my own solar cells are not able to provide sufficient energy there is a mix of energy provided by the net energy line. I would not start to tag solar (green)=energy to any loading point, despite a few exc

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 126, Issue 81, message 2, Which languages are admissible for name:xx tags?

Hi Paul., The flag of this discussion is IMHO not the question, but more about the source. Like you stated there are a lot of objects without a page, so lets stop announcing Wikipedia & Wikimedia as reliable sources, but name them for what is is second hand information. Which is not usable for O

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 171 Path for all

Hi All, IMHO it is never a well taken decision to tag a path / bridleway for walking or pedestrians at the same time. Ill shut up when walking a path and Equestrians have been using the same trail or path, a horseshoe tends to spoil the surface ruinous. Only a rocky hillside trail could stand

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 109 no 5 disused=:

Hi Paul ++1 Hendrikklaas Van: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org Verzonden: donderdag 16 januari 2020 17:50 Aan: tagging@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 109 Send Tagging mailing list submissions to tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 40 brick laying technics.

Hi Fernando, To start here, have a good 2020. I have been active laying bricks and stones (vert & hor), some people will notice the patterns, but not the sizes. How about the thickness of pavement in pedestrian area's ? Are you aware of the fact that they will be good to walk (4,5 cm) but fo

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 122, Issue 70 reinforced shooting walls ?

Hi I dont expect an embankment on a shooting range to be reinforced. The so called bullet-catcher is safely made out of sand or alike just to avoid swurling bullets at the end of the range, the sand allows the projectile to enter to wall and slowing it down. Another advantance is the recovering

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 122, Issue 68, earth walls

Hi you could tag them by surroundings and on top, with 2 circular ways tagged with man-made=embankment, be shure the short lines point up and down to eachother. Tats the way a slpe is determed in technical drwaings, the length and frequency of the lines is used to figure the decline, but since w

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 116, Issue 160 constructive comminucations

Hi OSM / mappers, I do have some remarks; IMHO there are too much channels or Fora, from OSM to Github, to read or talk about or over OSM. Par example if you want to read them all, you won’t be able to contribute as a mapper to OSM 🙂. I can’t admit what has been written before, but reactions t

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 73

ompliments for your outstanding contribution, Sergio On 2019-02-16 15:42, St Niklaas wrote: Hi Sergio, I doubt your analyses, since almost all buildings (5 million) in the Netherlands that have been imported since 2014, carry "start_date = 2022" or alike. Have a look here https

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 51 Re: tree rows vs individual trees

Hi Just an addition to Peters lines, follow the link, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/52.6446/5.6931 Each row is invalid marked as managed forest, yes the row is managed but just for residential use. Almost every farmyard has been surrounded by one or more rows of trees in this barren flat

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 110, Issue 135 Trans Alaska oil line

Hi Dave, Did you thought about movable=yes just as an extra value ? Greetz ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 108, Issue 71, languages & borders

HI folks, What about a local language that is used on a small island (Schiermonnikoog) by a minor number (15) people ? Or a group of whistling guys living in the eastern European borders, that has no words just sounds to communicate over long distances ? Greetz ___

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 89, Issue 15

Hi Ross, These reserve called areas looking like greens or parks, dont have any logic in or being connected thus left open for transport of any kind. They seem to be left overs, but they are all over Longwarrin (au) Signed with access=yes, motor cycles= no, closed with a gate. So your hint par

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 80, Issue 17, building digester

Message: 1 Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 20:37:07 +1000 From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=digester Message-ID: <557af9fb-35b2-2160-4770-b71a94110...@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >Some 'greenhouses' are

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 79, Issue 26

Message: 6 Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 21:39:54 -0500 From: John Eldredge To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Subject: Re: [Tagging] Masts vs Towers yet again Message-ID: <154273c9f48.2777.8c042f3e6e983dd0f57452e62f7f8...@jfeldredge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 79, Issue 21

Hi, The Gerbrandy tower is an example of a build concrete tower with some prefabricated steel accessible elements on top of it. It’s still a tower on the ground. Guided as well. A mast is a structure out of one piece, tall sailing ships excluded, a structured mast or lattice tower will be stand

Re: [Tagging] ContentsTagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 138, length= Francois

>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..." > > Today's Topics: >5. Re: length= (François Lacombe) > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:13:38 +0100 > From: François Lacombe > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related to

Re: [Tagging] Contents of Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 148, discussion, strategy and related tools

Today's Topics: > >2. Re: Lifecycle concepts, "REMOVED" (althio) > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:58:27 +0100 > From: althio > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Lifecycle concepts, "REMOVED" > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: tex

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 135, 4 length=

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 135 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:15:37 + > What do you think? Should the length tag be used with ways and > relations where the length can be calculated from the geometry itself?

Re: [Tagging] Contents of Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 84, 5 tagging allumination quality

> Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:55:37 +0100 > From: Volker Schmidt > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging road illumination quality > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >So I will try, at least locally suc

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5 floating bridges

> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 60, Issue 5 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:29:42 + > Today's Topics: > >1. Re: Feature Proposal - Voting - nudism (John Packer) >2. Feature Proposal - RFC - cliff clarification (Friedrich Volkmann) >3. Re: "floating" or "p

[Tagging] To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"

To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Subject: [Tagging] bridges Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I d like to contribute to the bridge discusson One remark I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building, if you ad it completely as a bridge to OSM. Th

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 53, Issue 13

From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 53, Issue 13 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:02:53 + > Today's Topics: > >4. Re: tag man_made=campanile to be replaced with > > The normal tagging for an English "Belltower", Italian "campanile",

Re: [Tagging] Contents of Tagging Digest, Vol 43, Issue 33, 1

> Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:54:43 +0200 > From: Pieren > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Surge tank > > > If nothing had been defined yet, I may use water=surge_tank on a member > > node of a pipeline=water way. > > > http://wiki.ope

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 43, Issue 6, Tagging city details, message 4

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 43, Issue 6 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 18:59:06 + > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 27

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 27, historic huts. >6. Re: Historic huts (Martin Koppenhoefer) > looking at the tags maybe > historic=wilderness_hut would be better (according to a proposal and > the current wiki state, tourism=alpine_hut

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 42, Issue 26 Historic huts

Hi Steve and Volker,> Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:16:13 +0100 > From: Volker Schmidt > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Historic huts > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > What about: > amenity=she

Re: [Tagging] Tagging proposition for a classification of a path, Vol 41, Issue 46 message 1

Balaitous wrote 1. Re: Proposition for a classification of path (Balaitous) > Also, the proposed path types would classify any path that ends in a cul-de-sac as the least-used and least-maintained category, which isn't necessarily the case. > > When I say "cul-de-sac" I refer to paths that go

Re: [Tagging] Contents of Tagging Digest, Vol 41, Issue 27

> Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:31:06 +0100 > From: Pieren > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tagging 'averaged' paths in rural Mali > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:08 A

Re: [Tagging] Contents of tagging digest, Vol 41, Issue 8, message 4

> Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:57:36 +0100 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bridge types > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >Hi Martin, > null > viaduc

Re: [Tagging] Contents of Tagging Digest, Wiki Building - HangarVol 40, Issue 49

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 40, Issue 49 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:29:40 + > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:29:31 +0100 > From: Pieren > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subjec

Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground, Vol 40, Issue 30

> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:23:55 -0500 > From: nerou...@gmail.com > CC: st.nikl...@live.nl > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground, Vol 40, Issue 30 Hi,Thanks, I > didnt use the right key word to see the tags. But the way of a underground > line remains secret to most of us if the data

Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground, Vol 40, Issue 30

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 40, Issue 30 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:52:42 + >5. Re: Powerlines underground (Fran?ois Lacombe) Hi Guys, since I had the wrong impression, it looks like were tagging underground pow

Re: [Tagging] Powerlines underground

> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 40, Issue 22 > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:24:42 +0100 > From: Fran?ois Lacombe > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [Tagging] [Proposed features/Power] Difference between aerial > and underground power lines > Message-ID: > > Content-T

Re: [Tagging] Multiple purposes for buildings

Hi All, I choose not to make them as multipolygon, but drew the condo's ontop. > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: [Tagging] Multiple purposes for buildings Maybe a bit late, I struggled with this building some time ago and even asked around. But after this t

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22 message 1 Chateau

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:00:07 + > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 21:22:39 +0100 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" >

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 38, Issue 52, message 7

> Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:47:30 + > From: Philip Barnes > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Proposed feature - age groups in schools > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8 > Hi Martin & Phil,More problems, in

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 38, Issue 47 proposed feature ages schools

>2. Re: Proposed feature - age groups in schools (Steve Bennett) Hi Kjarrval Isnt the school system different in every country or even State ? In some they even dont get schooling !Why are you making a proposal for every one, that doesnt fit at all ? Or would end up unlogic for every one to

Re: [Tagging] Contents of tagging Digest, Vol 38, Issue 34, 1

>1. piste:type=nordic but without underlying track (Michael S) > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:07:55 +0100 > From: Michael S > To: Tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [Tagging] piste:type=nordic but without underlying track > > Hello all, > > I have noticed a nordic trail , whe

Re: [Tagging] (tagging) RFC Advertising

> Am 28/ott/2012 um 15:32 schrieb Svavar Kjarrval : > > > In Iceland we sometimes have companies parking cars in public spaces or > > in private land after making a deal with the owner. The cars are marked > > with the company and almost always have advertising signs on the side. > > How would th

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 44, 3 John Sturdy

Hi, John, > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:20:04 +0100 > From: John Sturdy > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Uses of parts of buildings > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 38, animal_shelter

> Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:46:22 +0100 > From: Chris Hill > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated > Message-ID: <505b2c3e.6030...@raggedred.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Why? We d

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 20, 9

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 20 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:13:53 +0100 > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, vis

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17, 8

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100 > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, vis

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17, 7

> From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100 > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, vis

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12

> Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 12 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:27:33 +0100 Hi, Im reading this as a cartonist. IMHO > is additional info harmfull for a map and the vieuw of it. Always keep in > mind that the added info has to be maintained. But why do we w

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 53 wayside shrine, message 3

Hi > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:59:17 +0200 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Potale > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > 2012/8/28 Volker Schmidt : > >> > religion: chri

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 53 foot versus hiking message 5

Hi > From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 53 > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:20:30 +0100 > > Send Tagging mailing list submissions to > tagging@openstreetmap.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide W

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 42

Hi > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:50:37 +0200 > From: Janko Miheli? > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] Carriageway divider > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > 2012/8/20 Markus Lindholm > > > > > Yes

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 39

Hi, some remarks from the Netherlands (Europe) we do have roads marked with a double centre line (max speed 80 - 100), separated by 0,90 to 1,50 m and sometimes even with obstacles standing in the middle. These obstacles Your not allowd to cross that line sideways at any time, just cross, over

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 36

OSM, Ill put my reactions on on row (Issue 36).Even bare areas have growth youll only have to watch closely to see it. Thats a nice one for a herbologist or do we have a new tag ?>My take would be that the entire lot on which a house stands should be landuse=residential, as long as there isn't

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 32

Hi,I followed the discussion about tagging a railway track or more. From a geografersvieuw its simple, the closer youll go the more youll see. The program hides all the extra info fi a 16 lanes highway or several railtracks aside. At first I want to see a track or road. After closing in Im inte

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 23

Hi collegues, I dont know if Im too late, but Im missing some details. For instance ; What if a road is closed by a traffic sign closed to all traffic C1 (official roadsign numbers), pedistrians are allowed there theyre no traffic, or a complete area with C22a, limited environmental rules (Fi G

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 35, Issue 20

Hi taggers, Colins question are there more countries with different speed rules on tracks ? Yes all the TGV like tracks in Europe through, France, Germany and Netherlands are specially build for TGVs but somewhere there still tracks combined, limited speed up to 100 miles / hr. Hendrik

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest,

Hi Osm, I do have the next question and suggestions for more tags with the discriptions I do have the following problem, I would like to have more tags or possible keywords as value for military strongholds or castles. The only available definition is bunker or ruin, nothing more what if a bui