Re: [Tagging] wheelchair designated parking space tagging?

2019-01-11 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:41:13PM +0100, Richard wrote: looked at the possibilities, one problem: many parking places are fee=yes for normal users and fee=no for handicapped users. How can this be mapped? If you look into the proposal page from the parking space page on the wiki:

Re: [Tagging] Quick Building tracing question...

2019-01-10 Thread Xavier
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:34:40AM +1000, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On the subject of clarity of images. Was mapping the other day (using iD), marking buildings in an industrial area. As I said, the photo's weren't the clearest, but I was also peering through the purple haze of the mapped

Re: [Tagging] How to tag access restriction on interstate highway crossovers?

2018-12-30 Thread Xavier
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:38:26PM +0100, Volker Schmidt wrote: On Sun, 30 Dec 2018, 22:31 Xavier By "interstate highway crossovers" I mean small bits of road that connect the two carriage ways of a US interstate highway and are signed as "Authorized Vehicles Only" (

[Tagging] How to tag access restriction on interstate highway crossovers?

2018-12-30 Thread Xavier
By "interstate highway crossovers" I mean small bits of road that connect the two carriage ways of a US interstate highway and are signed as "Authorized Vehicles Only" (at least in Virginia they are signed this way). An example is here:

Re: [Tagging] Benefits of namespaces

2018-12-20 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 01:00:20PM +0100, Sergio Manzi wrote: I *never *heard of a transformer's /tertiary/, thus: try asking an electrical engineer... In general, a transformer can have 1..N primary windings and 1..N secondary windings:

Re: [Tagging] Can OSM become a geospacial database?

2018-12-06 Thread Xavier
On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:44:43PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: btw, just saw that roofer is defined as: "A workplace or office of a tradesman who is specialized in roof construction.", IMHO this should be more specific (if I am not misguided) by pointing out it isn't about the structure

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Pipe valves

2018-11-26 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:02:46PM +1100, Warin wrote: On 26/11/18 11:04, François Lacombe wrote: Hi, I think the document is complete, with all expected keys and values for this step https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal Let me know if any question

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-29 Thread Xavier Noria
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: +0.5, as UIs are decoupled from the data in OSM. You may write your own editor with a completely different UI, even one that doesn't know about oneway at all, so reasoning on UI preferences may help to get the

[Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
Hi, The default value for oneway is no for most types of roads. That is, if the attribute has no value set, no is assumed. Which is the rationale for that default? In the European cities and towns I know the majority of streets are one-way. For example Barcelona, or Madrid, or Paris. In such

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote: I wish people in OSM would stop making things up, believing it makes their point of view stronger. What? I am not assuming one-way would be a better default. Nor I am assuming anything about the world at large. What are

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote: 2) In cities and towns where two-way streets are exceptional like Barcelona or Madrid, are people expected to tag them no? The motivation for this question is that there seems to be the convention not to tag them, and

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
For the sake of discussion, I believe the interface for setting this attribute could be different (I am a software developer). For example, in graphical interfaces like iD you could have no preselected as convenience. But if you send no, you are saying no. Otherwise, you could opt-out and leave

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: Right now, the oneway checkbox in iD cycles through “Yes” “No” and “Assumed to be No” (blank). There are a handful of situations that will switch this checkbox to say “Yes” “No” and “Assumed to be Yes” (blank).

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: I believe that you haven't explicitly said so, but probably essentially want to be able to find streets that haven't been surveyed and potentially need a oneway tag and avoid false positives (aka such that are actually

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote: In any case there are roughly 45 million highway segments on which a oneway tag could make sense, vs. roughly 6 million oneway=yes and 1.5 million oneway=no. I suspect that it is really -far- too late to change the semantics

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:52 PM, John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com wrote: For a street, there is no practical difference nowadays between no and unset, which is a smell for me. Either way means no. For the software? No, there isn't a difference. For the mapper? Yes, there is a difference.

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: +1 To use add oneway=no in selected areas to confirm the road has been surveyed is fine, but not everywhere as that causes tag clutter and makes it difficult for a mapper to see the important tags. Which tools does a

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
Since I see the characteristics of Barcelona (and other cities/towns I know) are exceptional for most of you guys, let me share a couple of maps to explain where I am coming from. This is a typical sector of Barcelona: https://www.dropbox.com/s/k7o32zbneoi8y6q/barcelona_sample.png?dl=0 As

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Am 28.08.2014 um 22:35 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: 2014-08-28 22:31 GMT+02:00 Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com: that area in the center with many blue lines... almost all of them are wrong. You cannot rely

Re: [Tagging] default value for oneway

2014-08-28 Thread Xavier Noria
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: No, it isn't. The interpretation of the database, and the meaning, restricted to the fact of the streets oneway-ness is the same, but no value at all does not say this is no oneway street, it says nothing more

[Tagging] cinema service_times

2013-05-31 Thread François-Xavier Lamure Tardieu
I live in a small city and for the cinema, we don't have so many performance. Is it possible to have amenity=cinema service_times=Fr 19:00;Sa 15:00,17:00 for example like we use it for place_of_worship? thank you Xavier ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] cinema service_times

2013-05-31 Thread François-Xavier Lamure Tardieu
of problem for Haiti too. Xavier 2013/5/31 Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com 1) I think it's a local question. 2) If the times are stable then service/show times are just as good in the OSM db as opening hours are. My 2 cents, -Jaakko --Original Message-- From: Richard