Some parts are still valid and not off topic.
As material:wikidata shows that we need to well define the usage of
*:wikidata.
On the other hand we already the wiki as data base for tags and their
values. So if we stay with material or surface adding link to wikidata
in the value description
2014-04-02 0:46 GMT+02:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
I'm not so sure about operator:wikidata=* (or wikidata:operator=* as
suggested on the wiki talk page) and the other similar tags like that. I
think this should be discussed more since the current set of proposed
supplementary
2014-04-02 6:10 GMT+02:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com:
The last URL I used for OSM is http://www.palogne.be and I would like
to know how I can find the corresponding Wikidata ID to go alongside.
That's one of the strengths of Wikidata over Wikipedia. In wikidata you
just have to
2014-04-02 10:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
I think these tags are essential because the wikidata tag should be used
very carefully. People are probably going to start tagging McDonalds
restaurants with wikidata=Q38076 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q38076.
That is (maybe not so
I've been experimenting with wikidata tagging in OSM a bit lately. One
doubt I have is when tagging tombstones with subject:wikidata. Is that
correct? Normally that one is used when an artistic image is made of
someone. What if it's a family grave with more than one 'subject'?
What if it's only
2014-04-02 12:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
Then we could use wikidata:brand=
+1, or maybe brand:wikidata? Has the advantage to have all brand referers
in one block when sorting alphabetically.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging
On 2 April 2014 11:31, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
or rather brand:wikidata (which is already in the list)
Please see the proposal's talk page for discussion of how to order the
componets of sub-tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Wikidata#Order_of_parts
--
On 2 April 2014 09:47, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
I think these tags are essential because the wikidata tag should be used
very carefully. People are probably going to start tagging McDonalds
restaurants with wikidata=Q38076. That is (maybe not so obviously) wrong
because that
Very interesting and important discussion.
Are you all aware of that one of the main subjects of the next wikimedia
hackthon in May in Zurich is about this? Maybe it is interesting to discuss
this subject in Zurich? Like send the worked proposal to the people there or
something??
nounours77
2014-04-02 13:46 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Is the assumption that one Wikidata object should correspond to at
most one OSM object? If so, it would be good to make that assumption
explicit.
I wrote exactly that here:
In order to apply the name:etymology:wikidata=Q... tags, I created
associatedStreet relations for most cases.
Polyglot
2014-04-02 14:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
2014-04-02 13:46 GMT+02:00 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
Is the assumption that one Wikidata object
On 02.04.2014 12:24, Jo wrote:
I've been experimenting with wikidata tagging in OSM a bit lately. One
doubt I have is when tagging tombstones with subject:wikidata. Is that
correct?
wikipedia:subject is mentioned on the German wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Friedhofmapping
2014-04-02 14:47 GMT+02:00 Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com:
For example, one street is often made of several parts that have the same
name. If we were strict with that rule, we would use relations for all
streets (which isn't practical).
it isn't practical to create them for all streets, but
2014-04-02 15:35 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
it isn't practical to create them for all streets, but my guess is it
would well be doable for all streets with a wikidata correspondent. The
same for rivers (where it would be generally desirable to have a common
object,
On 2 April 2014 13:05, nounours77 kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com wrote:
Very interesting and important discussion.
Thank you.
Are you all aware of that one of the main subjects of the next wikimedia
hackthon in May in Zurich is about this? Maybe it is interesting to discuss
this subject in
On 2 April 2014 13:47, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
There shouldn't be more than one Openstreetmap item with the same Wikidata
ID.
Although that's not entirely possible.
There is also the case of sets; for example, four carvings which form
a single artwork, but which are mapped as
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-02 0:46 GMT+02:00 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
I'm not so sure about operator:wikidata=* (or wikidata:operator=* as
suggested on the wiki talk page) and the other similar tags like that. I
think this
On 2 April 2014 15:56, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 2 April 2014 13:47, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
There shouldn't be more than one Openstreetmap item with the same Wikidata
ID.
Although that's not entirely possible.
There is also the case of sets
One might
2014-04-02 16:56 GMT+02:00 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk:
There is also the case of sets; for example, four carvings which form
a single artwork, but which are mapped as separate entities.
You could put the four carvings into a relation, and put the wikidata tag
there (along with
I'm afraid I don't fully understand the reasoning behind OSM having its own
wikidata DB. What extra (different) data would we store in it, which
couldn't go in Wikidata? I understand it in the case of Commons to store
metadata like diaphragma and lenses used when taking those pictures.
Oh, maybe
I think our own wikibase could be used to give a more structured semantic
meaning of tags, and combinations of tags.
For example, we want to define what a McDonalds restaurant is in our
database. Is it a node with name=McDonalds? Well, a parking lot could be
named the same. Is it a way with
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 01.04.2014 19:04, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
I like Wikidata and therefore want to see this proposal approved. :)
What I'm interested in, though: If an object exists both in Wikipedia
and
If an object exists both in Wikipedia
and Wikidata, would you expect both tags to be used? Wikipedia links can
be obtained from the Wikidata API for a given Wikidata ID and vice
versa, so one of the two would suffice.
It might seem redundant but the key wikipedia shouldn't be removed when
On 2014-04-01 23:17, Tobias Knerr wrote :
On 01.04.2014 19:04, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I commend this proposal to the list:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
I like Wikidata and therefore want to see this proposal approved. :)
What I'm interested in, though: If an
25 matches
Mail list logo
