Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Pieren
I think here you just try to compensate the missing 'z' component in OSM. I don't see any problem to have over two elements on the same position if they have different ele or layer values. Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 10/lug/2014 um 10:09 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com: I don't see any problem to have over two elements on the same position if they have different ele or layer values. I think from a practical point of view these situations are problematic, both for creation and selection of these

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi Martin, at a first glance I thought you're joking with this proposal. Editor software often fuses nodes on the same coordinate, that's right unfortunately, but it's not a problem of nodes being on the same spot, but a bug in the editors. The handling of relations in most cases is even more

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-07-10 12:52 GMT+02:00 Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de: And: Why restrict to nodes? why not use a way relation as well for ways sharing the same spot (e.g. tram and highway, communication cables and water tubes, ...) yes, there is also room for a way-relation, completely agree.

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-10 Thread fly
Am 09.07.2014 23:49, schrieb Janko Mihelić: Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that is not an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is put on a wall. There is already a proposal for type=multilinestring [1]. I use it occasionally to map

[Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
I have proposed the node relation, a concept that I was missing for some time now. Have a look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Janko Mihelić
Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that is not an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is put on a wall. Janko Dana 9. 7. 2014. 19:47 osoba Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com napisala je: I have proposed the node relation, a concept

Re: [Tagging] RFC: Proposed Node Relation

2014-07-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 09/lug/2014 um 23:49 schrieb Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com: Should there be a relation with type=way? For when you need a way that is not an area over an existing way. Example would be a fence that is put on a wall. I think yes ___ Tagging