On 2012-12-03 20:27, Ole Nielsen wrote :
BTW, I'm not sure how useful the wet tag (old style or new style) is.
You will need some damn precise and detailed weather forecasts for a
route planner to be able to use such information. And usually it is
only fairly short sections of highway having
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I intentionally chose not to deprecate maxspeed:wet as I had the feeling
that doing so might upset some people and I didn't want such minor issues to
affect the voting process. Of course I will recommend to use the conditional
Of course
It's not the first time I see such process : propose a new tag, do not
say it would deprecate anything until vote is accepted (or - if you
don't like vote : consensus is reached, or no more complains), wait
few months, change the wiki from do not deprecate to recommend to
2012/12/4 Ronnie Soak chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com:
Are you against changing things in general or do you like to always
cut off old schemes completely without legacy support?
Because the described way is about the best solution I could come up
with that both allows change and gives the crowd
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ronnie Soak
chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you against changing things in general ... ?
Not if the intent is clearly to deprecate an existing tag. I'm against
liars writing in the wiki that they won't change any existing tags
until their proposal is
Before we use some strong words lets take a look at the issue:
according to taginfo maxspeed:wet is used 602 times. You may subtract
one or two hundred as I added them. So we are talking about a tag
that's currently used less than 500 times and without a known (at
least I dont know one)
2012/12/4 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
Before we use some strong words lets take a look at the issue:
according to taginfo maxspeed:wet is used 602 times. You may subtract
one or two hundred as I added them. So we are talking about a tag
that's currently used less than 500 times and
On 04.12.2012 13:31, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Ronnie Soak
chaoschaos0...@googlemail.com wrote:
Are you against changing things in general ... ?
Not if the intent is clearly to deprecate an existing tag. I'm against
liars writing in the wiki that they won't change any
2012/12/4 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Also please don't forget that maxspeed:wet is up to this
second completely undocumented.
it is documented, you get lots of hits in the wiki when searching for
it, e.g. here:
Quiet often if such a change is made (does not deprecate - recommend to
stop using) it is by someone other than the original proposal author.
Irrespective of this the proposal procedure is a RFC - Request For Change -
process. What it does is to say hey guys, I think we should change this,
if you
Hi all,
What is the status of maxpeed:wet? Is it now deprecated in favour of
maxspeed:conditional or is it a valid shortcut? Any opinions?
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
The conditional access restrictions proposal did not specify that this :wet
tag suffix would be deprecated (in fact it stated quite the opposite). From
a developers point of view however, it is beneficial if we use a consistent
tagging scheme, which is what the conditional tag was designed to
Hi!
Am 03.12.2012 um 20:27 schrieb Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl:
I intentionally chose not to deprecate maxspeed:wet as I had the feeling that
doing so might upset some people and I didn't want such minor issues to
affect the voting process. Of course I will recommend to use the conditional
2012/12/3 Ole Nielsen on-...@xs4all.nl:
BTW, I'm not sure how useful the wet tag (old style or new style) is.
neither am I
You
will need some damn precise and detailed weather forecasts for a route
planner to be able to use such information.
but getting the info from the sensors that it
pOn 2012-12-03 20:27, Ole Nielsen wrote:/p
pgt; BTW, I'm not sure how useful the wet tag (old style or new
style) is./p
pIn France the speed limit on motorways is 130 when dry and 110
when wet. I don't know what the legal definition of wet is for these
purposes. I do know I would not like to
15 matches
Mail list logo
