Thank you for bringing street_vendor=* to my attention. I've been looking
for something like this for some time now.
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:33 AM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
>
>
> 2 May 2019, 21:55 by amilopow...@u-cloud.ch:
>
> surface=whispering_asphalt or surface=silent_asphalt
>
> Please
Am Fr., 3. Mai 2019 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Peter Elderson :
> I would not map a noise level value for any surface. a. It's not the
> surface that produces the noise; b. it's a relative value, but compared to
> what? You would need/assume a standard regular noise value for comparison;
> c. the
2 May 2019, 21:55 by amilopow...@u-cloud.ch:
> surface=whispering_asphalt or surface=silent_asphalt
>
Please avoid fragmenting surface tag.
> Then I found on Overpass-Turbo someone that tagged "asphalt:type=porous".
>
Something like that would be preferable if it is mappable.
In general,
I would not map a noise level value for any surface. a. It's not the
surface that produces the noise; b. it's a relative value, but compared to
what? You would need/assume a standard regular noise value for comparison;
c. the standard will change over time, making all mapped values wrong.
I'm
sent from a phone
> On 2. May 2019, at 23:11, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> I'd rather propose surface=asphalt asphalt=whisper or the like.
>
> asphalt:type would also be okay with me. There are more likely 100s of types
> of asphalt.
I also would not introduce a new surface value, it is still
On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 07:53, Paul Allen wrote:
> If we need this tag (I have my doubts) then the only sane way of handling
> that would be
> something like noise_reduction_db=* where the figure is relative to a
> "normal" surface
> (e.g., smooth concrete) measured at some specified distance.
>
Whenever the quali ...-reducing is used, I know the stuff or thing actually
produces ... where ... is bad.
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 2 mei 2019 om 23:52 heeft Paul Allen het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 22:43, Tobias Wrede wrote:
>
>> I would question to use any
Well, one use case would be for property shoppers to find an area with the
quieter asphalt. But yes, all this is a bit far fetched.
On the other hand, I do not want to restrict people from mapping whatever
interesting information they know, as long as that information is in
standardized-ish
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 22:43, Tobias Wrede wrote:
> I would question to use any qualification at all. Whatever is now called
> a quiet/whispering/noise reducing asphalt will have become a standard in
> a couple of years and then a new type even more noise reducing will have
> been invented. Will
Am 02.05.2019 um 23:23 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan:
I don't think we should do asphalt classification -- too difficult for
many cases, and very little value, especially in this case because it
is not the "type" of asphalt, it is rather a "feature" of asphalt.
Multiple features could exist in the
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 22:24, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
> or it could have solar panels integrated into it
>
Yes, roads with integrated solar panels have been proposed. Any rational
engineering
analysis comes to the conclusion that this is a very, very stupid idea for
many reasons.
Nevertheless,
I don't think we should do asphalt classification -- too difficult for many
cases, and very little value, especially in this case because it is not the
"type" of asphalt, it is rather a "feature" of asphalt. Multiple features
could exist in the same asphalt - e.g. it could have noise-canceling
On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 07:55:40PM +, amilopow...@u-cloud.ch wrote:
> Hello
>
> I used to live in Fribourg, Switzerland where they put "whispering
> asphalt" on one of the main roads in order to prevent noise. You can
> barely hear an EV now, but that is another story.
>
> Since we have
On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 20:57, wrote:
>
> I used to live in Fribourg, Switzerland where they put "whispering
> asphalt" on one of the main roads in order to prevent noise. You can barely
> hear an EV now, but that is another story.
>
> Since we have quite a lot of discussions about noise pollution
I have not heard of “whispering asphalt” but I know that in some areas of the
state I live in they have been using a porous asphalt on roads to provide
better traction during rain storms.
So I am not sure if the current uses of “asphalt:type=porous” would be to
indicate pavement designed for
Hello
I used to live in Fribourg, Switzerland where they put "whispering asphalt" on
one of the main roads in order to prevent noise. You can barely hear an EV now,
but that is another story.
Since we have quite a lot of discussions about noise pollution I thought it
might be a good idea to
16 matches
Mail list logo
