>do you mean that for example the tripadvisor website is
>often more up-to-date for a POI than the POI website itself ?
On second look, my reply is off-topic slightly as this is about the
contact:* tags and review websites. I would never tag a review site like
YELP or Tripadvisor.
But in the
Am 16.09.2017 um 15:25 schrieb marc marc:
> and maybe it makes sense only for review system where you can retrieve
> the note from an id. systems where you have to go to their own website
> are unusable from an osm search (find a hotel close by with a 4 star review)
All three services provide
Le 16. 09. 17 à 13:49, Dave Swarthout a écrit :
> owners will update the website info as needed
do you mean that for example the tripadvisor website is
often more up-to-date for a POI than the POI website itself ?
AND that tripadvisor website is not enough to have all contact info and
it is why
Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> I have seen a few mappers recently adding
> contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
> to businesses.
>
> IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. While
> I personally think
> that we do not need them in OSM at all, they certainly do not
marc wrote: "When the poi has its own website website, adding a lot of tag
containing the pages that talk about this poi makes no sense
and look like seo spam."
There are sometimes good reasons to do this, IMO. I like to add the website
for hotels and guesthouses because the data consumer then
Le 16. 09. 17 à 00:56, Tom Pfeifer a écrit :
> I have seen a few mappers recently adding
> contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
> to businesses.
it sometimes happens that a small shop does not have a own website.
in this case it is useful to add the page of another commercial
website
On 16.09.2017 00:56, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites.
> While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at all, they
> certainly do not belong in the contact:* namespace.
I agree that these aren't contact channels, and it makes
On 09/15/2017 05:56 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> I have seen a few mappers recently adding
> contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
> to businesses.
>
> IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites.
> While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at all, they
On 2017년 09월 16일 00:56, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
I have seen a few mappers recently adding
contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
to businesses.
IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites.
While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at all, they
On 16-Sep-17 08:56 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
I have seen a few mappers recently adding
contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
to businesses.
IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review
websites. While I personally think that we do not need them in OSM at
all, they
I have seen a few mappers recently adding
contact:[ yelp | tripadvisor | foursquare ]
to businesses.
IMHO these are not means of contact, instead these are review websites. While I personally think
that we do not need them in OSM at all, they certainly do not belong in the contact:* namespace.
11 matches
Mail list logo
