The Mapillary app let's you choose the period between shots. So if I choose
2 seconds, and drive slowly, I could get most numbers. Well, depends on the
street, size of the numbers, and a few other factors.
Dana 20. 8. 2014. 22:26 osoba "John F. Eldredge"
napisala je:
> You will probably need to h
You will probably need to have the camera in video mode, and subsequently
locate which frames give you the best view of the house number. Trying to both
watch where you are going, and also pick the best location for a single shot,
would be about as risky as trying to send text messages while ped
Yes, people are doing this with GoPro:
http://blog.amanzi.org/2014/05/using-gopro-time-lapse-photos-for.html
On Aug 20, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to photograph sideways from my bike and send photos
> to Mapillary. The day should be shiny with a lot of l
On Wed Aug 20 2014 15:27:06 GMT+0100 (BST), Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to photograph sideways from my bike and send
> photos to Mapillary. The day should be shiny with a lot of light so I don't
> have to go to slow, and the camera should be mounted just right so I don't
> los
I'm trying to find a way to photograph sideways from my bike and send
photos to Mapillary. The day should be shiny with a lot of light so I don't
have to go to slow, and the camera should be mounted just right so I don't
lose too much numbers.
Then when the photos are on Mapillary, anyone can map t
IMHO mapping house numbers while on a bicycle is one of those things
that simply doesn't really work, contrary to other things that work well
(road signs etc). Not that it couldn't be done, but the technical effort
required to do so is significant (aka in the direction of googles
streetview tricycl
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Simon Poole wrote:
> Am 20.08.2014 12:11, schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
> ... lots of stuff from past experiences ...
>
> There is no reason not to immediately enter the address data, preferably
> as entrance nodes if the building outlines exist, if they don't, placing
> an address n
Am 20.08.2014 12:11, schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
... lots of stuff from past experiences ...
There is no reason not to immediately enter the address data, preferably
as entrance nodes if the building outlines exist, if they don't, placing
an address node at an appropriate place is far easier if you
2014-08-20 11:11 GMT+01:00 Ilpo Järvinen :
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Will Phillips wrote:
>
>> On 20/08/2014 00:02, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> > > Il giorno 19/ago/2014, alle ore 23:45, Will Phillips
>> > > ha
>> > > scritto:
>> > >
>> > > I find that by far the most time consuming part of survey
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Will Phillips wrote:
> On 20/08/2014 00:02, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > > Il giorno 19/ago/2014, alle ore 23:45, Will Phillips ha
> > > scritto:
> > >
> > > I find that by far the most time consuming part of surveying house
> > > numbers is actually adding the data after
Hi,
Thanks all for your thoughts. Will and Holger seem to have the same
approach as me, which gives me the confidence to edit the wiki and at
least document this approach:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers
Hopefully I've done it in a way which won'
On 20/08/2014 00:02, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Il giorno 19/ago/2014, alle ore 23:45, Will Phillips ha
scritto:
I find that by far the most time consuming part of surveying house numbers is
actually adding the data afterwards and for this reason I think we should be
trying to make the taggi
> Il giorno 19/ago/2014, alle ore 23:45, Will Phillips ha
> scritto:
>
> I find that by far the most time consuming part of surveying house numbers is
> actually adding the data afterwards and for this reason I think we should be
> trying to make the tagging quick and straightforward for map
I often use the addr:interpolation tag on entrances or buildings. I
don't understand some people's objection to this. I don't see any
ambiguity: if the addr:interpolation tag is present the addr:housenumber
tag represents a range, otherwise it should be interpreted as a single
address. As someo
fly wrote on 18.08.2014 17:40:
> Am 18.08.2014 16:29, schrieb Dan S:
>> I intuitively re-used the addr:interpolation tag, but applied it to a
>> single object. For example we might have this on a single node or a
>> building:
>> addr:housenumber=100-126
>> addr:interpolation=even
>> addr:stre
Am 18.08.2014 16:29, schrieb Dan S:
> Hi taggers,
>
> When mapping recently, I encountered many addresses which contain
> multiple housenumbers behind single entrances. I've used interpolation
> before, and used it in the "traditional" sense to map a range along a
> row of houses. But here we have
Maybe the cleanest solution is the proposed node relation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node
Although that wouldn't give the entrance an attribute with all those
addresses, it would just pile the addresses on top of the entrance. I'm not
sure. Interpolation tag sounds ha
Hi taggers,
When mapping recently, I encountered many addresses which contain
multiple housenumbers behind single entrances. I've used interpolation
before, and used it in the "traditional" sense to map a range along a
row of houses. But here we have an interpolated range on a single
object, not s
18 matches
Mail list logo
