Hello,
in our operation to fix campsite errors, there are several
cases of refugee camps.
some have temporarily abused tourism=camp_site to get a rendering
and be able to use standard applications (I can understand, lives
are impacted), but after a few years after the first use,
we should find som
>
> On 6/6/2019 5:27 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> >>* I'd suggest something like social_facility=temporary_housing.
> *>>>* To me, social_facility doesn't quite cut it for "refugees". Refugees
> *>* strike me as people fleeing from war / massive natural disaster -
> *>* social_facility comes
On 6/6/2019 12:58 PM, marc marc wrote:
Hello,
in our operation to fix campsite errors, there are several
cases of refugee camps.
some have temporarily abused tourism=camp_site to get a rendering
and be able to use standard applications (I can understand, lives
are impacted), but after a few year
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 03:00, marc marc wrote:
>
> 2 examples that I think are fine
> amenity=refugee_housing
> place=refugee_camp
>
IMO either of those would work
> 3 others examples
> tourism=camp_site + refugee=yes but it's not a tourism feature
>
Definitely not
> idp:camp_site=* but no m
Am 6. Juni 2019 23:27:37 MESZ schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick
:
>On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 04:34, Jmapb wrote:
>
>>
>> There are 40 instances of social_facility=refugee_camp, and 18 of
>> social_facility=refugee_housing.
>> For the primary tag you could go with social_facility=group_home or
>> social_fa
On 6/6/2019 5:27 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
I'd suggest something like social_facility=temporary_housing.
To me, social_facility doesn't quite cut it for "refugees". Refugees
strike me as people fleeing from war / massive natural disaster -
social_facility comes across as small scale fo
Le 07.06.19 à 15:56, Jan S a écrit :
> What's decisive is the vocation of the facility
and even before that, is there a facility at all ?
because there is a big difference between
1) people who fled the war and stopped "elsewhere",
then sometimes helped by ngo to survive
and
2) a country/city/ngo
I understand why refugee camps have been mapped with
amenity=social_facility - it's the closest existing tag, since
tourism=camp_site is clearly wrong and landuse=residential isn't quite
right.
However, I don't think that large refugee camps are a perfect fit for
amenity=social_facility.
Most of
If you look at it from a temporary residence for the group of people
perspective, then I guess tags like place=village/town/neighbourhood could
be better choices?
在 2019年6月10日週一 20:18，Joseph Eisenberg 寫道：
> I understand why refugee camps have been mapped with
> amenity=social_facility - it's the
The refugee camps I'm familiar with in Thailand are not social facilities
except in an incidental way. They are essentially internment camps
surrounded by fences with guarded gates where undocumented aliens are kept.
They are landuse=residential because they're isolated areas in the
countryside and
Am 10. Juni 2019 22:05:53 MESZ schrieb Dave Swarthout :
>The refugee camps I'm familiar with in Thailand are not social
>facilities
>except in an incidental way. They are essentially internment camps
>surrounded by fences with guarded gates where undocumented aliens are
>kept.
>They are landuse=r
Hi,
Did you think about adding refugee=yes tag on place=* ?
There were also an idea, if you have the boundary to develop rules
around boundary, similar to boundary = administrative to
boundary=refugee see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refugee_Camp_Boundaries
I also t
I did not add a refugee=yes tag. I tagged it as a place=town because my
quick search for alternatives came up empty and there are about 50,000
people living there. That way, at least the camp name shows up on maps and
is searchable. I'll retag it based on what we decide here.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019
sent from a phone
> On 12. Jun 2019, at 05:21, Dave Swarthout wrote:
>
> I did not add a refugee=yes tag. I tagged it as a place=town because my quick
> search for alternatives came up empty and there are about 50,000 people
> living there. That way, at least the camp name shows up on maps a
As wikipedia (1) seems to say refugee camp implies internally displaced
people it seem ok to me. (i was wondering if IDP was a type of refugees
or different)
Maybe add a refugee_camp:for=refugee/idp..., refugee_camp:type= informal/...
I still want to point out that there is more than 2500 use
Le 11.06.19 à 22:06, Violaine_Do a écrit :
> boundary=refugee see
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refugee_Camp_Boundaries
I agree with a boundary= because
boundary=administrative is wrong when it'sn't a administrative boundary
but it's the same issue with admin_level, u
I think that we basically have to distinguish between two types of migrant
or refugee camps.
On the one hand there are established camps that have developed an urban
structure, with shops, services etc. People often live in these camps over
long periods of time (in case of the Palestinians even se
21:45 Violaine, <mailto:viola...@posteo.net>> wrote:
fyi, i think you could help on this discussion...
Forwarded Message ----
Subject:Re: [Tagging] refugee camp
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:44:34 -1000
From: Violaine_Do
<mailto:violain
d, 12 Jun 2019, 21:45 Violaine, <mailto:viola...@posteo.net>> wrote:
fyi, i think you could help on this discussion...
Forwarded Message ----
Subject:Re: [Tagging] refugee camp
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:44:34 -1000
From: Violaine
d online access, I will monitor and comment more next week,
once back online proper.
Best,
Rupert
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, 21:45 Violaine, <mailto:viola...@posteo.net>> wrote:
fyi, i think you could help on this discussion...
Forwarded Message ----
Subject:Re: [T
Sent from a phone
> Am 20.06.2019 um 02:18 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> It is a land use, residential .. at least on a temporary basis. possibly
> landuse=residential, residential=migrants?
Sorry for replying late, just found this draft and sending it for the archives:
I would gen
Hi,
Thks Marc, I also like boundary=refugee_camp and camp_level=* with 1 for
camp boundary, 2 for first division such as zone, 3 for second division
such as sector, and 4 for 3rd division such as bloc. Or can we start
from 0 there, would make more sense camp_level=1 for first admin division.
22 matches
Mail list logo
