On Saturday 07 Nov 2009 2:30:54 pm Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Likewise setting up your own rendering takes half a day at best if
> you're not already familiar with the rendering tools involved.
>
OSM reflects changes within minutes
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
NRC-FO
Michal Migurski wrote:
> For live mode, clearly an undo feature would introduce more
> trouble than it's worth, for everyone involved in editing a
> particular area.
Spot on. Potlatch's undo does function in live mode - it predates save mode,
in fact - but it's not trivial and I wouldn't want
> What negative result do you fear would occur if somebody used[1] an
> unapproved feature?
>
> [1] That is, they tagged something as documented in the wiki, even if
> the documentation is to be found in Proposed Features? I'm not a big
> fan of chaotic mapping, where people apply tags randomly wi
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Shaun McDonald
wrote:
>
> On 7 Nov 2009, at 13:32, Anthony wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, we know that everyone could probably use OSM maps for their
>>> business website if they spent a week surveying the
2009/11/7 Shaun McDonald
> Maybe we need some method for companies/organisations to be able to
> say that an area isn't surveyed to a level they want and that they
> would like a particular area to be surveyed to a higher degree for a
> specific purpose. OpenStreetBugs is more for point errors, r
On 7 Nov 2009, at 13:32, Anthony wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
> wrote:
>> Yes, we know that everyone could probably use OSM maps for their
>> business website if they spent a week surveying their surrounding
>> area
>> / creating custom renderings. But that'
Lesi writes:
> I do not know which discussion you mean?
> According to the wiki voting is still neccessary to approve a new feature.
What negative result do you fear would occur if somebody used[1] an
unapproved feature?
[1] That is, they tagged something as documented in the wiki, even if
the
On Nov 6, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Michal Migurski writes:
>> instead make sure that multi-level undo is completely bulletproof.
>
> To make life more interesting, OSM editing goes on concurrently, and
> yet nearly everyone who is editing is editing a chunk locally. So OSM
> is epis
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 4:00 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> Yes, we know that everyone could probably use OSM maps for their
> business website if they spent a week surveying their surrounding area
> / creating custom renderings. But that's not very helpful when they
> can just embed Google i
SteveC wrote:
>
> We'd love to have a logo that better reflects the foundation...
For confirmation, is this a logo just for the foundation, or for the
wider project?
Cheers
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstree
Liz wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Dave F. wrote:
>
>>> I asked an NGO based in London why they use Google Maps instead of OSM on
>>> their 'contact us' page
>>>
>> To all the people who posted earlier than me:
>>
>> Yes, you all stated how it could be done & how to correct it, but...
>
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 06:56, SteveC wrote:
> The OSMF recently launched a new mediawiki powered site at
> http://www.osmfoundationorg/
> with a basic logo.
ouch...typo: http://www.osmfoundation.org/
--
-S
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Andrew Errington
wrote:
> What the web person *should* have done is looked at OSM in their new
> location and fixed the underlying data (if it was wrong or incomplete) or
> made their own map based on the data, but omitting the features they
> didn't like.
The web
13 matches
Mail list logo
