I have contacted the East Riding of Yorkshire council about NaPTAN
data. They would welcome our feedback about the quality of NaPTAN in
the county. The mappers in the county have checked about 20% so far, so
I expect to be able to send this feedback early next year.
The quality of the data
/20091130/e7f36df9/attachment-0001.htm
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:19:56 +0700
From: Khanh Le Ngoc Quoc khanh@gmail.com
Subject: [Talk-vi] Loi cam on tu Saigon Maping Party 2009
To: talk-vi talk-vi@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Željko Filipin wrote:
2009/11/29 Dražen Odobašić dodoba...@gmail.com
Što se dešava u srijedu?
Od 17-21h je u Mami okupljanje, ideja je staviti zaključke na wiki, što kako
gdje napraviti drugačije. A vjerujem da će se podaci i uređivati.
Srećom su
Izašao je Potlatch 2, evo linka na read only, verziju koja je još u
razvoju, ali dobro izgleda.
Osijek
http://www.geowiki.com/potlatch2/?lat=45.561418lon=18.676882zoom=15
Zagreb
http://www.geowiki.com/potlatch2/?lat=45.81299lon=15.97875zoom=15
___
Newby on OSM, I see that a lot of good work is completed about the
railway network, but it seems that the relevant tags are not always
consistent.
Should a way/relation relative to a railway line be described as a
«line» of the SNCB/NMBS (with the focus on the service, the operator,
the
gvdmo...@skynet.be wrote:
Should a way/relation relative to a railway line be described as a
�line� of the SNCB/NMBS (with the focus on the service, the operator,
the destinations, and so) or a physical infrastructure of Infrabel (with
the focus on the technical characteristics) ?
Now,
Further to Gauthier's message relating to Belgian Railways: it seems
obvious to me that LINE NUMBERS should be published, not train
indicators. Compare to bars/cafés: we should mention the NAME of the
place, not what beers are on tap or what food they serve.
After all, services offered on a
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:47:31 +, Karel Adams ade...@skynet.be wrote:
Further to Gauthier's message relating to Belgian Railways: it seems
obvious to me that LINE NUMBERS should be published, not train
indicators. Compare to bars/cafés: we should mention the NAME of the
place, not what
Hello everyone,
I'm new to this list but I've been doing some mapping in Brussels for
a few months.
Recently, I have been tracking bus stops in my area and found an
interesting case: the bus line 41 from the STIB/MIVB.
Its route happens to be different on weekdays and during the weekend,
due to
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yes, because there are two solutions to that problem.
1) Add an extra tag in that single country that differs from the rest of
the
world. But don't bother all the other mappers.
IMHO Don't piss off the whole world, just piss
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Nop ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
It would also be possible to solve the problem generically for the whole
planet.
The real problem is that many people claim that there is no problem or
that they have already solved it and everybody should just do as they do.
+1
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO Don't piss off the whole world, just piss off one country is a bad
solution, if there is no need to piss off anyone at all.
+1
Yes, but I would like us to define what the different national defaults are,
so that
As an Englander who has lived, albeit briefly, in Germany I do perhaps
recognise the difference between Germany and England as regards cycleways. I
think - but am not certain - that Germany is relatively unusual in having a
lot of cycleways that are NOT for pedestrians (foot=no) as Cartinus
On 25/11/09 15:16, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Hi,
Has anybody written a tool like osm2pgsql for importing OSM data directly into
SpatiaLite database? Alternatively, are there plans to make an OSM driver for
ogr2ogr?
-Jukka Rahkonen-
For my own needs I created a script to convert from OSM
Hi all,
I’d like to tell you about Potlatch 2, the all-new version of the
OpenStreetMap online editor.
Potlatch 2 is a complete rewrite still with the same principle in mind:
an editor which hits the right balance between speed, ease-of-use, and
flexibility. It’s under very active development
Just had a look at MapMaker. One cute thing: I made a change, and when it
got moderated, I had a look at the comment. It had this:
Interesting notes about this edit:
This road is not smooth or has an unusual turn angle
User is very new
A mature feature has been modified
This is a very
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO Don't piss off the whole world, just piss off one country is a bad
solution, if there is no need to piss off anyone at all.
+1
I see your point, but WOW, that seems like a lot of extra STUFF to
maintain - and
I'm doing a lot of mapping of pedestrian and bike paths around my
area, and am having trouble deciding when to use path, when footway,
and when cycleway. I'm particularly troubled by the way Potlatch
describes path as unofficial path - making it sound like an
unpaved line of footprints carved
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I’d like to tell you about Potlatch 2, the all-new version of the
OpenStreetMap online editor.
This is fantastic, I was getting really tired of the BAN POTLATCH!!
messages here, now I look forward to BAN POTLATCH 2!! instead.
Anyway, keep up the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Just like the tagging, the rendering is easy to customise. It uses a
special form of CSS, called MapCSS, which lets you create
wonderful-looking maps with just a few lines of text. The tagging and
rendering together
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
Do you know whether bikes can access the path? If a designated bike path,
use highway=cycleway/bicycle=designated (optional). If you're not
sure, use highway=footway and leave the bicycle tag out or use
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
This would simply be highway=cycleway, I think the general assumption is
that pedestrians are permitted unless foot=no is added.
The crux of the matter is that this is not what the wiki says, and not what
at
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
The UK view appears to be: foot can go anywhere (except motorways) unless
you say foot=no
The German view appears to be: foot can go anywhere except motorways,
cycleways and bridleways
And we have
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO Don't piss off the whole world, just piss off one country is a
bad
solution, if there is no need to piss off anyone at all.
+1
I see
I didn't resolve it because either the UK view or the German view (or some
other view) has to be the default. What we can't agree is which should be
the default.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Richard Mann
Steve Bennett wrote:
[...] I tend to
believe I can ride my bike wherever the hell I want unless there's a
sign saying otherwise.
That's fine for your personal decision making. However, for OSM we need
to provide people with as much information as possible so they can make
their own, possibly
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Richard Mann wrote:
I didn't resolve it because either the UK view or the German view (or some
other view) has to be the default. What we can't agree is which should be
the default.
not at all
we can have a cycleway
und einen Fahrradweg
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I told them that *the wiki recommends* that they do need to use
cycleway=opposite where appropriate.
1a) This is different to *me* telling them what to do - the wiki
carries more weight as it is the outcome of
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish we could codify these general assumptions. Because they won't be
universal, which means there is bad map data being generated.
I think it's critical that this stuff be summarised on the wiki.
Besides being highly
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
[...] I tend to
believe I can ride my bike wherever the hell I want unless there's a
sign saying otherwise.
That's fine for your personal decision making. However, for OSM we
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
I didn't resolve it because either the UK view or the German view (or some
other view) has to be the default. What we can't agree is which should be
the default.
Does it matter?? How hard is it to tag
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it matter?? How hard is it to tag cycleways and bridleways with
foot=yes/no??
I would have no problem with that, if it helped give us consistency.
From a purely pragmatic perspective, the more repetitive tasks
2009/11/29 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
When is there a path and when is there not a path? I walk through an
area of grass every time I go to the park near my house. Isn't that a
path which is part of reality?
An
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I out of line here? Of course I want to see a globally consistent, useful
database. But ultimately, I want to see the most number of users happy with
their local data. And if that means tags mean something slightly
2009/11/30 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Nick Whitelegg
nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
This would simply be highway=cycleway, I think the general assumption is
that pedestrians are permitted unless foot=no is added.
The crux of
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it matter?? How hard is it to tag cycleways and bridleways with
foot=yes/no??
I would have no problem with that, if it helped give us
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
An area of grass is - to me - not a path. A path, IMHO, is something
that exists independently of people walking or not walking on it (i.e.
usually you can *see* that it resembles a path).
-1, a path is either
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it's critical that this stuff be summarised on the wiki.
Besides being highly relevant to those who want to know *how to tag
things*, it might help us find a way forward out of this mess.
Yep. Even if some of
2009/11/30 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
An area of grass is - to me - not a path. A path, IMHO, is something
that exists independently of people walking or not walking on it (i.e.
usually you can *see*
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should aim for a globally consistent database, because
1) I travel a fair bit (I've never been to Bulgaria, but maybe someday
soon)
2) I do NOT want to be limited to Noppia-compatible routing software
if I
2009/11/30 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.comwrote:
I think it's critical that this stuff be summarised on the wiki.
Besides being highly relevant to those who want to know *how to tag
things*, it might help us find a way
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Liz wrote:
we can have a cycleway
und einen Fahrradweg
Yep. And cycleway ~= Fahrradweg.
Steve
There are umpteen ways of resolving it. The problem is that we don't have a
process for agreeing which. I wouldn't go
2009/11/30 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
A shortcut through grass that you can see, sure! e.g.
http://s0.geograph.org.uk/photos/18/97/189701_92c9a5d5.jpg
But if you can't see it - sorry - you're not going to convince me that
there is a path.
+1, I completely agree with you. Only
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should aim for a globally consistent database, because
1) I travel a fair bit (I've never been to Bulgaria, but maybe someday
soon)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Um...what??? That will not write itself. Do you expect us to
successfully digitize and maintain a database of all laws of all
countries?
What do you think? Work with me, here.
In a wiki, even? That's ambitious! I'd
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:55:18 +, Richard Mann wrote:
Dare I ask whether Halcyon can do offset lines (so we can start to do
one-way, bike lanes bus lanes with different casings)?
Richard
Great news for Potlatch users, i would suggest that you implement icons for
POI-s (At least for
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
1) After tagging a building, I want to define the property boundary
that the building sits in. In some cases, there's a landuse tag
(landuse=commercial, residential), but how to tag a non-profit bowling
club, a school, ...? Do you simply tag it
2009/11/30 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
2) Sometimes there is one occupied block in the middle of large areas
of nothingness. I want to tag the block to show that there is
something there - ie, it's not unmapped.
I don't quite understand what you mean; if there is 'something' then why
not
how do i tag/draw a connection between 2 islands, it is not a bridge as i
understand a bridge
take a look at the pictures on this page if you dont know what i mean
http://landsverk.fo/default.asp?sida=718bolkaid=6projectid=299
/LiFo___
talk mailing
2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen mgutte...@hotmail.com
how do i tag/draw a connection between 2 islands, it is not a bridge as i
understand a bridge
take a look at the pictures on this page if you dont know what i mean
http://landsverk.fo/default.asp?sida=718bolkaid=6projectid=299
yes,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
1) After tagging a building, I want to define the property boundary
that the building sits in. In some cases, there's a landuse tag
(landuse=commercial, residential), but how to
Incidentally, what's the best way to map nothing. Big, empty blocks on the
fringes of the city. Again, I want to distinguish between unmapped and
unoccupied. Some of them may be farms/agistment, some may be greenfield,
some might be crown land, some might be owned but unoccupied.
(Or maybe I
Ok thanks
i will use embankment
there are only 2 of them in Faroe Islands so no biggie to change
but then is the question what/how to tag
right now i just have a way going from one island to the other
should i draw an area that is a little wider than the road and tag the area as
an
This is a RFC for leisure=dog_park, where the initial proposal is from
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pjwebster/ who didn't contribute since
March 2008 and who doesn't respond to Emails (that's why I make this call,
on request from User:Giardia).
Please see the proposal here:
Hi,
please have a look at my new proposal DisabilityDescription:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DisabilityDescription
It allows you to provide information of special interest to disabled persons.
Thanks
Lulu-Ann
--
Sarah Kreuz, die DSDS-Siegerin der Herzen, mit ihrem
2009/11/30 Martin Fossdal Guttesen mgutte...@hotmail.com
Ok thanks
i will use embankment
there are only 2 of them in Faroe Islands so no biggie to change
but then is the question what/how to tag
right now i just have a way going from one island to the other
should i draw an area that
right now i just have a way going from one island to the other
should i draw an area that is a little wider than the road and tag the
area as an embankment
or should i just put an embankment on the way
What ever you like better. Remember
usage (leads to) convenience (leads to)
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Please see the proposal here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_off-leash_area
This tag already seems to be well in use:
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/leisure/dog_park
and there are no violent objections on the talk page, so it seems like
it's fine
Awesome,
i like how there will be (is) someway to view data thats available,
but not yet imported :)
i mention that at our CanVec import meeting saturday. So we'll find
the best way to make it work.
Sam
On 11/30/09, Marjan Vrban mvr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:55:18 +, Richard
Hi,
I don't know if this is exactly the right way to do it, but I read the Proposal
creation guidelines and I hope it is.
I needed some pictures for a new passport, so I thought why not tagging that
store?
There are several similar stores I would like to tag in my town. So I thought I
search
2009/11/30 Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk
Please see the proposal here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_off-leash_area
This tag already seems to be well in use:
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/leisure/dog_park
and there are no violent objections on the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
An area of grass is - to me - not a path. A path, IMHO, is something
that exists independently of people walking or not walking on it
Thanks Lulu-Ann for your articles.
My daughter is a wheelchair rider, a good rider ;-)
and I'm translating some of your articles into Japanese.
Hoping I could help your work someday.
Thanks
Shu Higashi (Higa4)
Hi,
please have a look at my new proposal DisabilityDescription:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if I map the entire section of grass which is within the right of
way as a polygon with highway=path, area=yes? That's how we represent
infinite overlapping criss-crossing invisible-paths, like a
pedestrian mall.
I'm kind
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if I map the entire section of grass which is within the right of
way as a polygon with highway=path, area=yes? That's how we represent
infinite
Steve Bennett stevagewp at gmail.com writes:
I don't quite understand what you mean; if there is 'something' then why not
just map that something?
Heh, because I don't know what it is! It's often hard to tell the difference
between a large rural property, a farm, or even some kind of light
2009/11/30 assetburned openstreet...@assetburned.de
Hi,
I don't know if this is exactly the right way to do it, but I read the
Proposal creation guidelines and I hope it is.
I needed some pictures for a new passport, so I thought why not tagging
that store?
There are several similar
Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
An area of grass is - to me - not a path. A path, IMHO, is something
that exists independently of people walking or not
2009/11/30 Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
A house would be building=yes or perhaps building=house. But for a block
or a
larger area, yes, tagging the landuse is fine.
I'd suggest to tag detached house differently from terraced houses and other
typologies, e.g. building=detached (currently 1425
On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Hi all,
I’d like to tell you about Potlatch 2, the all-new version of the
OpenStreetMap online editor.
Potlatch 2 is a complete rewrite still with the same principle in
mind:
an editor which hits the right balance between speed,
I would class that as a causeway, rather than an embankment. I think wet
area in the Wikipedia definition would refer to boggy ground, or an
intermittently-flooded low-lying area, rather than to lake-bottom or sea-bottom
that is underwater all of the time.
--
John F. Eldredge --
On Monday 30 November 2009 15:24:02 Steve Bennett wrote:
Incidentally, what's the best way to map nothing. Big, empty blocks on
the fringes of the city. Again, I want to distinguish between unmapped and
unoccupied. Some of them may be farms/agistment, some may be greenfield,
some might be
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:03 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
I would class that as a causeway, rather than an embankment. I think wet
area in the Wikipedia definition would refer to boggy ground, or an
intermittently-flooded low-lying area, rather than to lake-bottom or
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Map what you can verify:
* Often these are expanses of grass with the occasional bush -
landuse=grass
Not to be a pain, but that doesn't exist (or isn't documented).
landuse=meadow I guess. That would actually satisfy a lot
If you look at the photos on the web page, the feature in question is
definitely man made, not natural. It is a raised walkway between two islands,
made by piling up rocks.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:33 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
If you look at the photos on the web page, the feature in question is
definitely man made, not natural. It is a raised walkway between two
islands, made by piling up rocks.
Yep. Same with my example. I'm just going
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:33:42 John F. Eldredge wrote:
If you look at the photos on the web page, the feature in question is
definitely man made, not natural.
Despite its tag name, natural=coastline is used for all coastlines, whether
they are natural or man made.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
Hi
That it is the same problem as with shoe_repair and locksmith. I've never seen
a shop that act only as one of it. But I have seen different shops that also
act as locksmith and something else, but not as a shoe_repair shop. By the way
locksmith is another tag I really would like to see.
On Monday 30 November 2009 18:23:33 Steve Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Map what you can verify:
* Often these are expanses of grass with the occasional bush -
landuse=grass
Not to be a pain, but that doesn't exist (or isn't documented).
On Nov 30, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
Dare I ask whether Halcyon can do offset lines (so we can start to
do one-way, bike lanes bus lanes with different casings)?
Richard
We're close on this with Mapnik, feedback welcome:
http://trac.mapnik.org/ticket/180
Dane
2009/11/30 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
I would actually
prefer natural=meadow for the last, but since the preset in JOSM doesn't
show
what key is used for meadow, both natural and agricultural meadows are
tagged
with the same tag by a lot of people.
Of course it is shown in JOSM: just
2009/11/30 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
I would class that as a causeway, rather than an embankment. I think wet
area in the Wikipedia definition would refer to boggy ground, or an
intermittently-flooded low-lying area, rather than to lake-bottom or
sea-bottom that is underwater all
Hi everybody,
I would like to plan my next trekking holiday with online tools. What I have
in mind is the following: A map (preferably osm) to mark tours and routes
and some form of note taking tool to pull together information on
accommodation, supplies, flights and so forth.
Does anybody know
2009/11/30 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Hi all,
I’d like to tell you about Potlatch 2, the all-new version of the
OpenStreetMap online editor.
Potlatch 1 is fantastic. You have set yourself up a tough target to
better it. I am looking forward to the initial release to find out :-)
by your name I guess you're an English native speaker, so I guess
you're right, still the definition in WIkipedia states:
In modern usage, a *causeway* is a road or railway elevated on a
sandbank http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandbank, usually across a
broad body of water
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if I map the entire section of grass which is within the right of
way as a polygon with highway=path, area=yes? That's how we represent
infinite overlapping criss-crossing invisible-paths, like a
pedestrian mall.
Not bad.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Um...what??? That will not write itself. Do you expect us to
successfully digitize and maintain a database of all laws of all
countries?
What do you think? Work with me, here.
I think that would be a nightmare, and
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:09:10 Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
I would agree that it is more like a Causeway jugding from the wikipedia
article and images, but i cant find any tag for that, and i dont think it
would render on the map
There are only twelve occurrences of man_made=causeway
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get
global consistency, and that that's important;
2) people realise that editors can be used to avoid additional
keystrokes and so there is actually no cost in adding
Roy Wallace wrote:
Routing software that is aware of the local laws of each country seems
obvious.
Um...what??? That will not write itself. Do you expect us to
successfully digitize and maintain a database of all laws of all
countries? In a wiki, even? That's ambitious! I'd prefer to
Hi Guys,
After a few weeks testing and trials, Mapzen public beta was released
this evening. You can start using it straight away:
http://mapzen.cloudmade.com
You can find more info here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapzen
Happy mapping,
---
Nick Black
twitter.com/nick_b
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get
global consistency, and that that's important;
2) people realise that editors can be used to avoid
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get
global consistency, and that that's important;
2) people
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
how do i tag/draw a connection between 2 islands, it is not a bridge as i
understand a bridge
take a look at the pictures on this page if you dont know what i mean
http://landsverk.fo/default.asp?sida=718bolkaid=6projectid=299
/LiFo
In
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Roy Wallace wrote:
Routing software that is aware of the local laws of each country seems
obvious.
Um...what??? That will not write itself. Do you expect us to
successfully digitize and maintain a database of all laws
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
1) I can convince you guys that this approach is the best way to get
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:25:36 Roy Wallace wrote:
1) I can convince you guys
Thanks everyone for the kind comments! Really appreciated (and I should
reiterate that loads of the clever stuff is Dave's work rather than mine).
Marjan Vrban wrote:
Great news for Potlatch users, i would suggest that you implement icons
for POI-s (At least for most used). So that we could
2009/11/30 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl
On Monday 30 November 2009 22:09:10 Martin Fossdal Guttesen wrote:
I would agree that it is more like a Causeway jugding from the wikipedia
article and images, but i cant find any tag for that, and i dont think it
would render on the map
so what?
Roy Wallace wrote:
The point I was making was that it should *not* be necessary to
*require* a database of all laws of all countries to know what
highway=cycleway means. There should be one definition that is
consistent for the whole world. For example, this path is marked with
a sign with a
1 - 100 of 283 matches
Mail list logo
