Hi Carlos,
Well, we can have a one-off tutorial event for people like you who can't
come to this Mapping Party. I think maning and Ed did that one time before
talking about JOSM. :-)
Eugene
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Carlos Tirona carlos.tir...@gmail.comwrote:
This sounds good. And
The link to Facebook is obviously wrong. It should be:
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=121402554549978
If you have a Facebook account, please RSVP if you can (even a decline would
be useful). :-)
The cake slices are also set:
Hi,
I also looked at this import but I abandoned it for several reasons:
- 25ha may be good for France or even Holland but for a region like
Flanders it is simply too big: we have no land use planning (ruimtelijke
ordening) here whatsoever. So land use tends to be small scattered
On 5/17/10, Kenny Knecht kenny.kne...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I also looked at this import but I abandoned it for several reasons:
- 25ha may be good for France or even Holland but for a region like
Flanders it is simply too big: we have no land use planning (ruimtelijke
ordening)
Hi,
Roy Wallace wrote:
I really like Robert's contribution. But I guess I understand, now,
that some people think it falls short on story-telling.
I think my grief with the suggestion is that not only does it not tell
the OSM story but IMHO tells a wrong story. I think if it were like one
of
Hi,
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 08:48:53PM -0400, Sami Dalouche wrote:
The http://garmin.na1400.info/routable.php page contains only
auto-routable maps, right ?
My current need is to get :
- routable maps for Quebec, Vermont, New Hampshire, and NY
- hiking maps for Quebec, Vermont, New
On 17 May 2010 07:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Roy Wallace wrote:
I really like Robert's contribution. But I guess I understand, now,
that some people think it falls short on story-telling.
I think my grief with the suggestion is that not only does it not tell
the OSM
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I think my grief with the suggestion is that not only does it not tell
the OSM story but IMHO tells a wrong story. I think if it were like one
of those 70s logos, just OSM written in a funny font, I'd probably still
find it extremely bland but at least it would not
Am 17.05.2010 00:59, Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
Only a large scale change is going to fix that, bar a few things that
you've already shot down like having a feedback tab. Something so
obvious and easy to do that I've been asked multiple times why on
Earth we haven't done it.
As you
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't think that an a patch for the rails port which lets people
add feedback would be difficult to do
http://www.skobbler.co.uk/osmbugs
Skobbler rocks.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/new-logo-tp5046672p5064419.html
Am 17.05.2010 12:18, Richard Fairhurst:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't think that an a patch for the rails port which lets people
add feedback would be difficult to do
http://www.skobbler.co.uk/osmbugs
www.openstreetbugs.org
Are we talking feedback on the data or feedback on the project?
I
Now a lot of places are full of pro-mappers, we are doing house numbers,
shops, football pitch lines...
Do we need an extra zoom level?
For example I'm learning to add buildings/shops and see
http://osm.org/go/euuOoC_pJ--
You can only see about a third of the shop/business names because of
Now a lot of places are full of pro-mappers, we are doing house numbers,
shops, football pitch lines...
Do we need an extra zoom level?
For example I'm learning to add buildings/shops and see
http://osm.org/go/euuOoC_pJ--
You can only see about a third of the shop/business names because of
On 17 May 2010 11:18, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't think that an a patch for the rails port which lets people
add feedback would be difficult to do
http://www.skobbler.co.uk/osmbugs
Skobbler rocks.
How about something like this?
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:02:53 +0100, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Now a lot of places are full of pro-mappers, we are doing house numbers,
shops, football pitch lines... Do we need an extra zoom level?
For example I'm learning to add buildings/shops and
see
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Adding a zoomlevel adds 4 tiles for each tile in the previous zoomlevel.
You'll go from 91 billion tiles to 366 billion.
This meaning you need 4 times the load to generate, 4 times the storage to
hold them, 4 times the
Adding a zoomlevel adds 4 tiles for each tile in the previous zoomlevel.
You'll go from 91 billion tiles to 366 billion.
This meaning you need 4 times the load to generate, 4 times the storage to
hold them, 4 times the traffic to display them.
Mathematically speaking is true, but maybe is not
On Mon, 17 May 2010 14:32:34 +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati
fabioloc...@gmail.com wrote:
Adding a zoomlevel adds 4 tiles for each tile in the previous
zoomlevel.
You'll go from 91 billion tiles to 366 billion.
This meaning you need 4 times the load to generate, 4 times the storage
to
hold
Hi all,
here is a question from one of my friends,
*what linux-based wifi gps phone would you recommend?*
any suggestions?
thanks,
mike
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hello all,
Frederik Ramm typed:
SNIP
You mean that to keep pace with Waze and Google Map Maker, we should
simply drop the libertarian bullshit and become just another company
with top-down decision making and a marketing department that does
whatever seems best? Just because others manage
HTC Desire: if you want an iPhone without the ponce factor
-or-
Openmoko FreeRunner: if you want to run Debian on this Linux-based
wifi gps phone.
Cheers, Joseph
On 17 May 2010 13:37, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
here is a question from one
Nice,
I've added a 'downloads' section on each of Canada's provincial wiki
pages, for those who dont need upto the minuite Garmin Maps. Thanks to
Cloudmade.com for having the .osm files made.
-i'll need to figure out how to get my listing on their
Sam
On 5/17/10, Andrew McCarthy
Hi,
Claudius wrote:
Am 17.05.2010 12:18, Richard Fairhurst:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I don't think that an a patch for the rails port which lets people
add feedback would be difficult to do
http://www.skobbler.co.uk/osmbugs
www.openstreetbugs.org
Are we talking feedback on the data or
On 17 May 2010 17:32, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Now a lot of places are full of pro-mappers, we are doing house numbers,
shops, football pitch lines...
Do we need an extra zoom level?
YES and I was thinking of posting about it but waited because I want
to learn about simple
Speaking of not enough zoom levels, locations in the more northern and more
southern latitudes actually have an extra zoom level. Because of the
Mercartor projection, locations near 60 degree latitude (north or south)
have twice the linear scale as locations on the equator for the same zoom
level.
On 17 May 2010 22:47, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
HTC Desire: if you want an iPhone without the ponce factor
There is a lot of android phones to pick from, not sure how many allow
root access or you can get root access with them.
Openmoko FreeRunner: if you want to run Debian on
On 17 May 2010 22:31, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Could it be done selectively - only in urban areas? No need for an
extra zoom level in the desert... That would at least help with the
storage and generation aspects.
Most map tile systems setup with mod_tile only generate on
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 21:43, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Some selective replying...
Have a look at waze's twitter feed. *That* is the kind of community
building we need to be doing now.
Agreed, but you personally control the openstreetmap twitter account
don't you? If you think waze's
On 05/17/2010 05:47 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/5/16 SteveCst...@asklater.com:
As for why this is better, anyone who has printed t-shirts, conference
material or worked in branding will tell you, as I already have that the
current logo:
* has too many colours
* doesn't scale
On 17 May 2010 14:37, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
here is a question from one of my friends,
what linux-based wifi gps phone would you recommend?
I have a Nokia N900 and love it. It's more of a
linux-computer-in-your-pocket, but it does most
Robert Martinez wrote:
Now, could everybody still in doubt please do a simple google
image search for good logo and check for logos that tell a story!
I bet you'll hardly find any.
Robert, I think you have produced a good logo. Not an outstanding one, like
(to quote two of my favourites)
md == Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl writes:
md Adding a zoomlevel adds 4 tiles for each tile in the previous zoomlevel.
md You'll go from 91 billion tiles to 366 billion.
md This meaning you need 4 times the load to generate, 4 times the storage to
md hold them, 4 times the traffic to
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
My suggestions:
1) Please reword the list to not have judgemental label on it. just the
facts
i've removed the list. it was intended as a bit of fun, certainly not
to offend anyone and i honestly didn't expect anyone
Matt,
Many thanks. Hopefully the tool can be back improved with all the
suggestions that have been posted to this list.
N.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
js == John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com writes:
js I wonder how consistent you could get the look and feel between the 2
js systems, otherwise it might cause more confusion than anything.
This would require work, yes. But even the Mapnik rendering has
discontinuities between zoom
2010/5/17 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
right. that would be the a term.
You don't have to be a designer to use the desaturate button.
The challange is to make it work afterwards.
The current logo does not work monochromatic, mine does.
have you ever seen a monochromatic version of the
One thing that has frustrated me with the current tiling system is that most
POIs are only visible if you zoom in all the way, and can only see an area 50
meters or so across. This rather limits their usefulness. It would also help
if you could click on a POI, or hover your mouse above it,
On 18 May 2010 07:00, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One thing that has frustrated me with the current tiling system is that most
POIs are only visible if you zoom in all the way, and can only see an area 50
meters or so across. This rather limits their usefulness. It would
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I'm a magazine editor. Part of my job is assessing the work our designers
come up with, [..] Not everyone is a stereotypical hacker.
I am a garment decorator, sign maker and also do something similar to
book cover design.
But yours is the wrong simple logo. It's a
On 17 May 2010 22:00, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One thing that has frustrated me with the current tiling system is that
most POIs are only visible if you zoom in all the way, and can only see an
area 50 meters or so across. This rather limits their usefulness. It would
more responses: thanks for your input
BUZZ: Guttorm Flatabø - New HTC mobiles are getting very good reviews. I
have a Sumsung, but I'm stuck with Android 1.5
IRC xjjk Phurl: there are only 2 real contenders... Maemo-based or
Android-based and they're both pretty excellent. the former is more
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Robert Martinez wrote:
Now, could everybody still in doubt please do a simple google
image search for good logo and check for logos that tell a story!
I bet you'll hardly find any.
Robert, I think you have
2010/5/18 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
You couldn't sort of extrapolate forward from a GIS system to OSM. You
couldn't extrapolate from crappy Nokia phones forward to the iPhone
(without hindsight, of course).
I think you're comparing apples and oranges here. You can't compare a
logo (an
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Yes you could take the existing logo and just make it red or something,
but that's just not nearly as appealing as changing it fundamentally
because there's a sea of other ideas out
On May 17, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El 17/05/2010 1:53, SteveC escribió:
I'll send you a I love you bean and give you a big kiss on stage at SOTM.
How about it?
That'd be quite gay, Steve.
You're just jealous :-)
Yours c.
Steve
Frederik Ramm writes:
Both of these are unwanted; (a) is not possible without actually moving
your own location around in small increments - a certain Russ N.
reputedly has a script that does that and got bollocked for it.
Nope, didn't. Nobody ever complained.
I think it would be nice
Serge Wroclawski writes:
It's not hard to write, actually.
It's hard to get right, though.
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Johnson ros...@hotmail.com
Date: 17 May 2010 16:06
Subject: [Aust-NZ] guide to spatial acronyms
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
This is a handy guide for deciphering acronyms used in the spatial industry!
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:27:56 +0800, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this what you are talking about?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/basin%3Dinfiltration
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034383.html
I had looked at basin=infiltration
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Incidentally, to make sure I'm understanding what we're talking about,
you're talking about an area where water runs *into*, in order to seep
into the soil?
That would be a retention basin I think, and these drains have exits as far
as i understand
On Mon, 17 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
The current tagging scheme for doing transponders don't seem to take
multiple transponders on the same tower:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
___
Talk-au
Liz wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Incidentally, to make sure I'm understanding what we're talking about,
you're talking about an area where water runs *into*, in order to seep
into the soil?
That would be a "retention basin" I think, and these drains
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
that's this
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these ones
Maybe so, but the data the ACMA released only covers TV and radio
stations, it
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:35, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
The original data source contains all those kinds of things:
http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_proximity.nearby_sites_list?pMODE=
DMSpLAT=-35.13873086pLONG=149.17643464
It
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:50, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Interesting, lists commercial licencees only
That's a list of transmission sites, while most are probably
commercial installations, I'm guessing some of the transponders will
be for community radio
On 18 May 2010 10:29, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
FF3 or Konqueror was enough to get a listing of the sites close to a given
area
despite a piece saying xml error
They have a map, but I couldn't get it to work, just the XML errors in frames...
___
on a low zoom map
Tasmania now appears as Hampshire
haven't got time to check it out
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Bannerman b.banner...@bom.gov.au
Date: 18 May 2010 11:21
Subject: [Aust-NZ] FW: Request to Participate in GEOSS Survey [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Fyi.
This is a worthwhile survey if you get the time.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still after
suggestions on how to tag multiple transponders for the same node, I
don't think tagging multiple nodes on the same spot is a good idea,
using a single node + multiple relations might work I suppose,
On 18 May 2010 13:00, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Relations should only be used for groups of objects in which each
object may take on a specific role.
Maybe so, but it's often the best way to tag things at present since
you can't have duplicate keys, but in this case you are
Someone had placed a POI in north western Tasmania for the Hampshire
district, but with k=place,v=country, so it was showing up as a
country label. I changed it to a hamlet for now.
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:40:01 +1000
From: Liz ed...@billiau.net
Subject: [talk-au] vandalism?
To:
Perguntei na talk@ e deram o pulo do gato: o datum estava errado.
python ogr2osm -p +proj=utm +zone=23 +south +ellps=GRS67
+towgs84=-66.87,4.37,-38.52 arquivo.shp
Pelo o que eu entendi, aprece que o padrão brasileiro de datum SAD69 é
diferente do padrão internacional, uma espécie de PAL-M por
E aí galera, contem aí como foi!
[]s
Em 14 de maio de 2010 11:05, Samuel Vale srcv...@minaslivre.org escreveu:
On Sex, 2010-05-14 at 00:42 -0300, Vitor George wrote:
Olá Pessoal,
No sábado estarei na Casa de Cultura Digital em SP para colocar na
pauta o OpenStreetMap. Vou propor para
Am 17.05.2010 07:21, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 16.05.2010 21:55, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
hi jan,
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
Na
Am Sonntag 16 Mai 2010, 18:39:30 schrieben Sie:
Ich habe folgendes aus Deinem Text gelesen, tut mir Leid, wenn
ich Dich falsch verstanden habe:
macht ja nix, sowas kommt vor :-)
Ein Stadtteil ist ein Gebiet innerhalb der Ortsgrenzen (die gelben
schilder) einer groesseren Stadt, das aus
Am 16. Mai 2010 21:18 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
Steht mal im widerspruch zu dem Bild hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
und auch der in dieser Seite verfassten Definition in Schriftform.
In der Deutschen variante:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:31:50AM +0200, Martin Simon wrote:
Das ist *nicht* die Definition von highway=path. Das ist *ein*
Beispiel für die Verwendung von highway=path (genau wie die
Fuß/Radweg-Kombinationen darüber).
Die Definition steht weiter oben auf der Seite und erwähnt in beiden
Am 17.05.2010 07:21, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 16.05.2010 21:55, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
hi jan,
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
Am 17.05.2010 08:17, schrieb Toni Erdmann:
Am 17.05.2010 07:21, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 16.05.2010 21:55, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
hi jan,
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor einigen
Am 17.05.2010 09:12, schrieb Ulf Lamping:
Am 17.05.2010 08:17, schrieb Toni Erdmann:
Am 17.05.2010 07:21, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 16.05.2010 21:55, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
hi jan,
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von
Hallo,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor
einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
+1
Das eine sind normallerweise recht eng geografisch zusammen gehörende
Am 17.05.2010 08:17, schrieb Toni Erdmann:
Am 17.05.2010 07:21, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 16.05.2010 21:55, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
hi jan,
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor einigen
Am 17.05.2010 09:24, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor
einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
+1
Das eine sind normallerweise
Am 17.05.2010 09:24, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor
einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
+1
Das eine sind normallerweise
Am 17.05.10 09:24, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Das andere sind logische Gruppierungen alle Objekte einer Art:
Packstationen, Stolpersteine, etc., die jeweils den gleichen Tag tragen
- und das über die ganze Welt verteilt. Die Info kann man dann aber
genauso gut über Datenbankabfragen (z.B. XAPI)
Am 17. Mai 2010 08:53 schrieb Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:31:50AM +0200, Martin Simon wrote:
Das ist *nicht* die Definition von highway=path. Das ist *ein*
Beispiel für die Verwendung von highway=path (genau wie die
Fuß/Radweg-Kombinationen darüber).
Die Definition
Am 17.05.2010 09:24, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Ulf Lamping wrote:
ich dachte, es wäre inzwischen ALLEN klar, dass Relationen NICHT zum
Gruppieren (zusammenstellen von Objekten) dienen soll. Da gab es vor
einigen
Wochen mal wieder Diskussionen drüber.
+1
Das eine sind normallerweise
Hallo,
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
Dann frage ich mich allerdings was dann eine Paketbox-Relation [1] soll.
Die ist in meinen Augen genauso sinnfrei wie eine Relation
Bundesstrassen in Nordrhein-Westfalen oder McDonald's-Filialen in
Deutschland oder Strassenlaternen, die mit Gas betrieben werden.
zumindest zu sun_studio [1]
die uebersicht ist ziemlich hilfreich [2]
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/beauty
[2]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features#Proposed_Features_-_Shop
Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
Hi!
Irgendwie finde ich ständig Läden, für die es
Hallo,
Andre Joost wrote:
- und das über die ganze Welt verteilt. Die Info kann man dann aber
genauso gut über Datenbankabfragen (z.B. XAPI) abholen.
genauso gut nicht, weil man mit der XAPI neben der bounding box nur
genau ein Kriterium abfragen kann.
Fuer den konkreten vorliegenden Fall
Am 16.05.2010 19:30, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
seit einigen Wochen werden vermehrt Stolpersteine erfaßt.
...
Es würde mich freuen, wenn die Erfassung in HH so weiter vorangeht wie
bisher - es gibt nämlich schon ein großes Interesse an der daraus
entstehenden Karte.
Letzte Woche habe ich mir
Am 17.05.10 10:07, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Grundsaetzlich sind Mapper bei uns eine knappe Ressource, wir sollten
also dem Mapper so wenig wie moeglich Arbeit aufbuerden, und einen
Stolperstein einfach als solchen zu taggen und es dem Suchenden zu
ueberlassen, was er suchen will, ist
Hallo,
Andre Joost wrote:
Wenn ich alle Packstationen über die Relation einlade, fällt ein
falscher tag (auch beim Operator, z.B. mit oder ohne AG, Gmbh usw) eher
auf. Gerade bei Objekten mit nem Haufen Zusatztags schleichen sich da
schnell Fehler ein.
Das sollte man lieber ueber ein
Hola,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 09:53:50AM +0200, André Riedel wrote:
Ich habe trail eingworfen, da es eine Kategorie unter Path ist. Ich
sehe aber ein, dass es da noch Definitionsbedarf brauch.
Bei OSM fehlt es meistens nicht an der definition - die wird sowieso immer
interpretiert und nach
Toni Erdmann wrote:
... Relationen gruppieren doch gerade (physikalische)
Objekte zu einer Einheit und geben ihnen eine gemeinsame Bedeutung.
genau so sehe ich das auch.
Wenn man aber mal genauer hinsieht (und das haben einige hier bereits getan
+++) bestehen vernünftige Relationen aus
Am 17.05.10 10:35, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Andre Joost wrote:
Wenn ich alle Packstationen über die Relation einlade, fällt ein
falscher tag (auch beim Operator, z.B. mit oder ohne AG, Gmbh usw) eher
auf. Gerade bei Objekten mit nem Haufen Zusatztags schleichen sich da
schnell Fehler
Am 17.05.10 10:57, schrieb Walter Nordmann:
Wenn man aber mal genauer hinsieht (und das haben einige hier bereits getan
+++) bestehen vernünftige Relationen aus VERSCHIEDENEN Objekten, die dann
zu einer Einheit zusammengefasst werden. (z.b Stop-Positionen, Haltestellen,
Bahnsteige und
Am 17.05.10 10:07, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Andre Joost wrote:
- und das über die ganze Welt verteilt. Die Info kann man dann aber
genauso gut über Datenbankabfragen (z.B. XAPI) abholen.
genauso gut nicht, weil man mit der XAPI neben der bounding box nur
genau ein Kriterium abfragen
Markus liste12a4...@gmx.de wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway=riverbank
Es gibt ja durchaus auch ein width tag. Leider berücksichtigt das der
Mapnik aber nicht. Vor langer Zeit hab ich das aber in den Osmarender
eingebaut.
Falls jemand also mit Laser Entfernungsmesser
Hallo,
Andre Joost wrote:
Dann mach mal ;-)
Und solange dürfen keine Stolpersteine/Packstationen/Wanderwege gemappt
werden!
Klar duerfen sie. Bloss sollte man dafuer keine Relationen missbrauchen.
Mal für den Bahnbereich:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtbahn_Bonn
Immerhin drei
Am 17.05.10 12:16, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Mal für den Bahnbereich:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadtbahn_Bonn
Immerhin drei Betreiber auf 6 Linien ohne eindeutige Abgrenzung
Und wie habt ihr das tagging-maessig dann geloest?
In Bonn: falsch ;-)
Als operator den Betreiber mit den meisten
Andre Joost wrote:
Also wenn die SGV-Wanderheime in der Wanderwegs-Sammelrelation sind,
kannst du damit leben?
aber sicher!! nur ne relation, die NUR aus wanderheimen besteht und sonst
nix, wäre nicht ok.
p.s. meine rettungspunkt-relationen sterben zu zeit. ;(
hattest du sowas auch
Hallo André,
du hast leider Recht!
Mit JOSM 'Objekt laden' und der RelationsID bekomme ich in wenigen
Sekunden alle Stolpersteine
von Hamburg, sofern sie der Relation zugeordnet sind.
Mit:
wget.exe
Am 17.05.2010 12:04, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Markusliste12a4...@gmx.de wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway=riverbank
Es gibt ja durchaus auch ein width tag. Leider berücksichtigt das der
Mapnik aber nicht. Vor langer Zeit hab ich das aber in den Osmarender
eingebaut.
Hallo,
Jacques Nietsch wrote:
Hallo André,
du hast leider Recht!
Mit JOSM 'Objekt laden' und der RelationsID bekomme ich in wenigen
Sekunden alle Stolpersteine
von Hamburg, sofern sie der Relation zugeordnet sind.
Mit:
wget.exe
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
