Interesting things have been happening in Iceland
OpenStreetMap-wise. The city of Reykjavík (the capital) just approved
that they'll be commissioning an online cycle map and pedestrian
router based on OpenStreetMap data.
There's some more about this in a blog post I wrote:
http://www.openstr
Hi,
On 5 September 2010 05:40, Zeke Farwell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:32 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> yes, but it get's even harder when the information is split over
>> several layers and you do edits without even seeing the data, because
>> it is on a different layer. How cou
cool,
thanks :)
now i can do an objective analysis of year over year comparison of the
tagging wars 5 episode popularity contest.
cheers,
sam
On 9/5/10, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Sam Vekemans
> wrote:
>> hi,
>> does anyone have a really old planet.osm file (from the
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Sam Vekemans
wrote:
> hi,
> does anyone have a really old planet.osm file (from the 1st year of
> existance)?
>
>
> I want to compare what the top tags that where used in the database,
> compared to the current top tags used.
Looks like these only exist back to Ap
hi,
does anyone have a really old planet.osm file (from the 1st year of existance)?
I want to compare what the top tags that where used in the database,
compared to the current top tags used.
thanks,
sam
--
Twitter: @Acrosscanada
Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/
http://Acrossc
2010/9/5 Iván Sánchez Ortega :
> On Sunday 05 September 2010 11:27:41 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> > http://vimeo.com/album/932606
>>
>> Is there some overview of the talks (maybe the schedule?) that could
>> link to this?
> Obviously, this takes some effort :-)
Not much. (Done) :-)
htt
On Sunday 05 September 2010 11:27:41 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> > http://vimeo.com/album/932606
>
> Is there some overview of the talks (maybe the schedule?) that could
> link to this? The titles as they are now don't give much of an idea of
> what each one is about.
Ideally, everything s
Hi,
> But if the community at large has decided against layers in the
> past I'm interested to hear why.
Personally I've not decided anything. My opinions may change over time
with new arguments and as I learn new information.
One thing I wonder though. Is it possible for an openstreetmap editor i
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 23:45, David Carmean wrote:
>
> Quick cuts from the venue a/v system's recordings are now available here:
>
> http://vimeo.com/album/932606
>
> Saturday and Sunday videos will appear gradually over the next couple of
> weeks,
> as we have time to work on them.
Great. Th
On 05.09.2010 11:03, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
integrity. IMHO it is the strength of OSM in respect to GIS that we do
not have layers. Layers do structure the data in a different way that
tags do: tags allow to structure as you like in the processing of the
data, while layers force you to divid
2010/9/5 Zeke Farwell :
> ...For this reason I would want layers to be
> completely separate. As long as they are separate and represent different
> types of objects that don't need to be connected then I don't really see any
> problems.
besides boundaries: for which other objects do you think t
hi,
the ArcGIS osm editor can handle layers, and from what i heard (wiki
page review) that is works well.
IMO generally, osm works as a flat sheet of paper, were people of all
skill levels can work on the map at the same time.
So having osm like a complex arcgis editor, makes it harder for the
12 matches
Mail list logo
