Łukasz Stelmach writes:
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2].
There is no such thing as a crappy projection. Every projection is a
compromise, and every projection
On 3/7/2011 9:51 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/7 Nathan Edgars II:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
the wiki states for the USA http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway
motorway = "Limited access freeway with interchanges."
In my reading every highway which is not limited access should not
Hi all,
I have a GPS logger in the Android Market and a few days ago I updated it to
a new version which includes uploading GPX files directly to
http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/gpx/create.
The app is called "Open GPS Tracker" can be found at
https://market.android.com/details?id=nl.sogeti.
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Tom Roche wrote:
>
> How best to use OSM to "map" non-existent features for planning
> purposes, e.g., for public charrettes? (Apologies if this is a FAQ, but
> a brief search of
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ
>
> and of the lists via
>
> http://www.goo
Tom Roche wrote:
> How best to use OSM to "map" non-existent features for planning
> purposes, e.g., for public charrettes?
This shouldn't be mapped in the main OpenStreetMap database. OSM is for
mapping real, verifiable locations, not hypotheticals.
Rather, you should set up your own OSM install
Jukka Rahkonen writes:
> Łukasz Stelmach poczta.fm> writes:
>
>> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
>> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
>> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8
>> warped to EPSG2180. How
How best to use OSM to "map" non-existent features for planning
purposes, e.g., for public charrettes? (Apologies if this is a FAQ, but
a brief search of
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ
and of the lists via
http://www.google.com/custom?sa=Google+Search&domains=lists.openstreetmap.org&sit
2011/3/7 Nathan Edgars II :
> M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> the wiki states for the USA http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway
>> motorway = "Limited access freeway with interchanges."
>> In my reading every highway which is not limited access should not be
>> tagged as motorway, be it in no
On 07/03/2011 13:31, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it is an error as soon as not all attributes on the road apply to the
parallel cycleway ...
Any map (in fact any measurement) has errors. Adding extra information
to the map is useful, even if it doesn't add all the information that
everyone co
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> Last time I read a discussion about bicycles on interstates the only
> known spot where they were allowed in the US was some few miles on one
> rural interstate highway (where there was if I recall right no other
> alternative route for many miles).
>
> For trunk r
Łukasz Stelmach poczta.fm> writes:
>
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
> to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer writes:
> 2011/3/7 Łukasz Stelmach :
>> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
>> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
>> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
>> to EPSG2180. How to u
2011/3/7 Łukasz Stelmach :
> Hello.
>
> This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
> unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
> projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
> to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp (how to prepar
2011/3/7 ant :
> On 07.03.2011 11:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> It's not an error, it's a matter of detail (micromapping). I do map such
> ways separately--but lots of mappers don't. I believe it is still much more
> common to add a "cycleway=track" to the road instead, which is a
> well-documen
Hello.
This has been discussed[1] some time ago but the answer is somehow
unclear to me. I understand that EPSG:900913 is (may be?) a crappy
projection[2]. However, I still need a map of Poland at zoom 6-8 warped
to EPSG2180. How to use geotifcp (how to prepare metadata) to embed
appropriate infor
On 07.03.2011 11:30, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/7 ant:
When turn restrictions are practically circumvented by
separate cycle tracks that are not mapped, their application for bicycle
routing is based on nothing
It is a common mapping error to not map distinct cycle tracks with an
own
Am 07.03.2011 11:30, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/3/7 ant:
When turn restrictions are practically circumvented by
separate cycle tracks that are not mapped, their application for bicycle
routing is based on nothing
It is a common mapping error to not map distinct cycle tracks with an
ow
2011/3/7 ant :
When turn restrictions are practically circumvented by
> separate cycle tracks that are not mapped, their application for bicycle
> routing is based on nothing
It is a common mapping error to not map distinct cycle tracks with an
own way and it is the reason, why separate tracks
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:03 +, Ed Avis wrote:
> I would hope that this new state of play has changed the timetable a little
> bit.
> Has the OSMF board discussed the new Creative Commons offer?
I believe the board (or possibly lwg) has discussed it before, as Im
fairly sure Ive seen it in mi
Hi,
On 06.03.2011 17:15, Cartinus wrote:
Experience teaches us that unless something consumes a not so common tag, it
won't get tagged much. Once a tag is consumed by something highly visible
like a renderer or a router it's use will increase.
Meanwhile if the MQ bike router would know about ex
maning sambale gmail.com> writes:
>OK then, I'm not asking for any legalese interpretation here, just the
>time-line for the succeeding phases of implementation. No fixed date
>was given for phase 3 in the wiki:
>However, the OSMF minutes have set it already on March 31st:
>https://docs.google.
2011/3/7 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
you might think about tagging them as
> trunk roads or change the country specific definition for motorways in
> the US.
another option would be to tag them as bicycle=yes and
highway=motorway, even if this might seem redundant to you, it doesn't
to many other mapp
2011/3/7 Paul Johnson :
> On 03/06/2011 07:13 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> 2011/3/7 Paul Johnson :
> OK, so.. this isn't a motorway?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_5
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_84_(west)
I don't have an idea how these highways look like (besides so
Hello,
We opened registration for the State of the Map Europe 2011 in
Vienna today. Your early bird conference pass for all three days comes at
EUR 60. We suggest payment by bank transfer (no additional costs in
European SEPA area). On payments by PayPal, we need to add an additional
surcharge of
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 03:45:45 -0800 (PST)
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>
>> Joseph Reeves wrote:
>> > without explaining in layman's terms what this means.
>>
>> http://old.opengeodata.org/2008/01/07/the-licence-where-we-are-where-were-going/ind
25 matches
Mail list logo
