Re: [OSM-talk] Tracks and there place in society

2011-05-25 Thread Russ Nelson
Ben Robbins writes: > >The easiest way to create order in OSM is to DOCUMENT HOW YOU MAP, and > >DON'T MAP IN OPPOSITION TO HOW OTHER PEOPLE MAP. We don't all need to > >map the same way, but the people who use the data need to understand it. > > Here I completely disagree. Not that it's not

Re: [OSM-talk] level_crossing, leveled

2011-05-25 Thread Russ Nelson
Richard Weait writes: > What should be done with a level_crossing, when trains may cross no longer? > > The junction was a level_crossing, but has been repaved and > re-sculpted. The rails are now covered by 0.3 - 0.4 m of asphalt > which appears to have been laid directly over the tracks.

Re: [OSM-talk] low resource osm xapi instance

2011-05-25 Thread Robin Paulson
On 26 May 2011 14:57, Ian wrote: >> JXAPI allows multiple predicates, but they are currently OR'd rather than >> AND'd like I meant them to be. The above query is akin to saying "give me >> all relations with route=bus OR ref=010 OR in bbox=...". > > I just pushed some code out (and deployed to jx

Re: [OSM-talk] low resource osm xapi instance

2011-05-25 Thread Ian
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:32:06 AM UTC-5, Ian wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:38:25 AM UTC-5, Phil! Gold wrote: >> >> * Robin Paulson [2011-05-24 11:31 +1200]: >> > this is my query: >> > >> http://open.mapquestapi.com/xapi/api/0.6/relation[route=bus][ref=010][bbox=-174.327,-37.236,175.324

Re: [OSM-talk] low resource osm xapi instance

2011-05-25 Thread Robin Paulson
On 25 May 2011 02:32, Ian wrote: >> Everything I've read about XAPI and JXAPI has said that only one predicate >> is supported, aside from the bbox predicate.  It's possible that you're >> getting all the bus routes within that bbox. > > JXAPI allows multiple predicates, but they are currently OR'

Re: [OSM-talk] level_crossing, leveled

2011-05-25 Thread Phil! Gold
* Richard Weait [2011-05-25 15:10 -0400]: > HI all, > > What should be done with a level_crossing, when trains may cross no longer? I usually have the disused raily intersect the road but don't tag a level_crossing on the intersection. In some cases (where the tracks have been torn up rather th

Re: [OSM-talk] level_crossing, leveled

2011-05-25 Thread John Smith
On 26 May 2011 05:10, Richard Weait wrote: > HI all, > > What should be done with a level_crossing, when trains may cross no longer? > > The junction was a level_crossing, but has been repaved and > re-sculpted.  The rails are now covered by 0.3 - 0.4 m of asphalt > which appears to have been laid

[OSM-talk] level_crossing, leveled

2011-05-25 Thread Richard Weait
HI all, What should be done with a level_crossing, when trains may cross no longer? The junction was a level_crossing, but has been repaved and re-sculpted. The rails are now covered by 0.3 - 0.4 m of asphalt which appears to have been laid directly over the tracks. So the railway hardware appe

Re: [OSM-talk] Tracks and there place in society

2011-05-25 Thread colliar
Am 24.05.2011 20:49, schrieb Richard Fairhurst: > Ben Robbins wrote: >> All we need is a phisical list, and an access list. > > Um, we have that already. > > For physical tags, we have: > highway=footway, or > highway=cycleway, or > highway=bridleway, or > highway=track > > See h

Re: [OSM-talk] relations within relations - walking trails

2011-05-25 Thread colliar
Am 24.05.2011 21:21, schrieb Hermann Peifer: > Thanks for the hints. I managed to redefine our regional bike route 51 > as a relation of 2 relations (local bike routes) and 5 Ways which are > needed for filling the gaps in between the local routes: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/158