On 15/05/2012 15:37, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
is much better than this negative method.
The problem is that this page is mixing real mistakes (mainly bad
imports) and areas where t
'Visualization' is not (just) American English. It's the preferred
spelling of Oxford University Press and many other British academic
publishers.
Steve
On 15/05/2012 19:50, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-05-15 09:25, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Maybe the fact that it's German (assuming that it is
At 2012-05-15 09:25, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Maybe the fact that it's German (assuming that it is) is a sign of
OSM's popularity there, and approaching Google Maps.
The caption language doesn't really sound like "DEnglish", or even UK
English, though. The spelling is American English (e.g.
At 2012-05-15 07:10, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
> The problem with the spanish place names is not that there are no roads
> connecting them, the problem is that they are not places. The area is
> unpopulated.
But they are all tagged with "place=locality"
I didn't understand the comment about Minecraft. Did they think there was a
problem with the square forest boundaries? Did they not realize that those
are likely the actual defined boundaries of the forest (at least that's
what they correctly look like in southern California)?
Also, I don't th
On 15 May 2012 15:37, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
>> Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
>> is much better than this negative method.
>
> The problem is that this page is mixing real mistakes (mainly bad
> imports) and are
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:43 PM, SomeoneElse
wrote:
> Kate Chapman wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
>> is much better than this negative method.
> Maybe there's a place for both, but one "worst" example appears to be
> someone who's b
Hi,
On 05/15/12 12:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
What I really miss though is a possibility to comment / discuss the
examples. This could help to explain the context of the screenshot as
well as discuss some examples which might be disputed.
There has been some discussion about individual ite
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
> The problem with the spanish place names is not that there are no roads
> connecting them, the problem is that they are not places. The area is
> unpopulated.
But they are all tagged with "place=locality" which is correct for
unpopulated pla
On 2012-05-15 15:37, Pieren wrote:
Italian forest or the spanish place names without roads or the street
The problem with the spanish place names is not that there are no roads
connecting them, the problem is that they are not places. The area is
unpopulated. There is not even a house to be
Kate Chapman wrote:
Hi All,
Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
is much better than this negative method.
Maybe there's a place for both, but one "worst" example appears to be
someone who's been mapping their home town for about a month, which
really isn't f
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
> Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
> is much better than this negative method.
The problem is that this page is mixing real mistakes (mainly bad
imports) and areas where the geodata do not comply with the a
Hi!
For parody it has quite a attacking tone.
But I was forgot about Best Of OSM. Looks nice, needs some additions for
my country, but it's something I can show when someone asks what OSM can
provide.
Peter.
O , 2012-05-15 14:01 +0100, Gregory rakstīja:
>
>
> It's a great site. It shows the
It's a great site. It shows the variety and reach of OSM work. It's also
fun to look at the older posts, click the links, and see improvements.
Calling "Worst of OSM" is because there is the http://bestofosm.org/ website
and the opportunity for parody, but I can see that will have the danger of
ups
Hi All,
Personally I think it is discouraging. I think positive encouragement
is much better than this negative method. Sure it is helpful to
discuss problems somewhere but I think calling it the Worst of OSM is
unfair. If the "map is never done" then isn't everything technically
the worst at some
On 2012-05-15 12:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I couldn't find a contact possibilty on the page, that's why I try it
here.
Worst of OSM is a nice idea IMHO:
http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/
What I really miss though is a possibility to comment / discuss the
examples. This could help to explain
I couldn't find a contact possibilty on the page, that's why I try it here.
Worst of OSM is a nice idea IMHO:
http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/
What I really miss though is a possibility to comment / discuss the
examples. This could help to explain the context of the screenshot as
well as discuss so
17 matches
Mail list logo
