It's a great site. It shows the variety and reach of OSM work. It's also fun to look at the older posts, click the links, and see improvements. Calling "Worst of OSM" is because there is the http://bestofosm.org/ website and the opportunity for parody, but I can see that will have the danger of upsetting someone. There will be reasons why the owner is anonymous and it allows for anonymous submissions.
I agree comments should be enabled. Hopefully the owner of the site will see this thread, or perhaps we should request it using the submissions form. On 15 May 2012 12:57, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 2012-05-15 12:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> I couldn't find a contact possibilty on the page, that's why I try it >> here. >> >> Worst of OSM is a nice idea IMHO: >> >> http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/ >> >> What I really miss though is a possibility to comment / discuss the >> examples. This could help to explain the context of the screenshot as >> well as discuss some examples which might be disputed. >> > > I agree. I have looked at some examples, and while some are just caused by > the nature of our (armchair) mapping (non-existing roadnames in Brazil) and > some seem to be correct (the street-like boundaries on a mountain on Java), > some really need discussing and fixing, like the crossing in > (Leipzig)-Schönau, which has been tidied up, but is still broken IMHO > (mapping every single lane is not a good idea IMHO), and like the "3% of > villages in Spain" example, which looks like an automated import gone wrong. > > Regards, > Maarten > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> > -- Gregory o...@livingwithdragons.com http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
