pavithran wrote:
The new map replacement from apple in its IOS has drawn a lot of criticism .
Just to correct the link ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/sep/20/apple-maps-ios6-station-tower
and another read
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2012/sep/20/apple-google-maps-heada
I'm about to leave for a 2 week trip to Europe and wondered if there
were any local OSM gatherings I could drop in on. Our time isn't
precisely planned out but here are the highlights. Obviously the
arrival/departure dates are fixed. The other ones are subject to
change.
Budapest: Arriving here on
Some examples of the curiosities in ios6 maps:
http://theamazingios6maps.tumblr.com/
Greets,
Floris
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:39 PM, pavithran wrote:
> > The new map replacement from apple in its IOS has drawn a lot of
> criticism .
> >
>
2012/9/20 Lester Caine :
> My own interest here is more historic than current and I was looking for the
> development of areas relating to my family tree, but there seems to be a
> general consensus that once an object ceases to exist it should be deleted
> from the database.
there is not this ge
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
My own interest here is more historic than current and I was looking for the
>development of areas relating to my family tree, but there seems to be a
>general consensus that once an object ceases to exist it should be deleted
>from the database.
there is not this gen
On 9/21/2012 3:12 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Begs the question - are any of the OSM routing options iPhone friendly?
GPS Nav/2 from Skobbler ($): Can do offline routing
OpenTripPlanner for transit on the iPhone - I'm guessing about 2 months
yet until a release
http://www.kickstarter.com/projec
2012/9/20 pavithran :
> Having said that How much is it OSM data?
That's a question I am also interested in. When the first preview of
their maps became available it looked very much like OSM data to me in
my area. The forests were taken from OSM, no doubt (same shape and
coverage only where ther
Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Christian Rogel:
So, as we have a DWG a making tremendous efforts for maintaining a
good policy
for the data (including the boring chase of proprietary ones), it may
happen and it
will happen more and more that a projected decision exceed the field
of the data
po
Hello Toby,
I'm about to leave for a 2 week trip to Europe and wondered if there
were any local OSM gatherings I could drop in on.
the only general hint that I can provide is to have a look at the
calender in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Calendar
A lot of regular
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Simon Poole wrote:
> I believe one of the issues here is the categorization of the separate
> account requirement as political, when I suspect most would see it as a
> purely administrative/technical matter and the textual change as a
> clarification of existing
On jeudi 20 septembre 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> If the negative effects however affect other/different people - perhaps
> because they are using the API outside of specifications, or causing
> more work for people elsewhere in the project - then they can't.
I can only fully agree
Am 20.09.2012 13:43, schrieb sly (sylvain letuffe):
which isolated processes ?
You are the guy that requests that the French community is doing things
different than the rest of the OSM-word. So you must answer your
question by yourself...
Best regards,
Michael.
___
On jeudi 20 septembre 2012, Lester Caine wrote:
> sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> >> The 'mechanisms' that we use MUST be managed centrally,
> > What are you talking about ? What "mechanisms" are you refering to ?
>
> Simply the methods by which data is added to the database.
There are several meth
Hi,
On 09/21/12 14:12, sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
No problems, let's discuss. But while we do talk about a future rule, the
previous one should (I mean "must") still apply until the new one is ready to
replace it.
This is not about "one rule". This is about the whole question of rules
and a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> As long as DWG have to clean
> up the mess they will make the rules governing imports and mechanical edits.
> Exceptions from the rules can be negotiated with DWG in advance if someone
> thinks they really need one.
Thanks Frederik for this
On 20 September 2012 08:02, Greg Troxel wrote:
> I'm mostly a lurker in these discussions, and generally more pro-import
> than many who participate in import decisions. But I find the 'separate
> account for import' to be an utterly reasonable (along with the rest of
> the guidlines), easy to fo
On vendredi 21 septembre 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
Hi again,
> This is not about "one rule". This is about the whole question of rules
> and authority.
No problems, let's also talk about rules and authority.
But we (french community) are facing one problem right now, not "problems",
on
On 21 September 2012 16:09, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Does this mean that all of those maps are now under OdbL? (At least,
> if they use up to date data only available under ODbL?)
That raises some interesting questions because ODBL planet was
available only recently , Did apple wait till last
sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/248 because that poor guy
doesn't read english, was following what we've always done.
Hang on - they've been editing since 5th September, it's just over two
weeks later; their changeset 13180810 contains 21976 nodes and the
2012-09-20 Frederik Ramm
> However, every once in a while DWG gets a complaint about a particular
user making lots of edits that are questionable.
> Not outright vandalism
or edit warring, but something exotic enough to make other mappers in
the area uneasy.
> The other mappers watch the user
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, pavithran wrote:
> That raises some interesting questions because ODBL planet was
> available only recently , Did apple wait till last minute to get them
> ? Or are they mixing the old planet(CC by SA) with new datasets(ODBL)
They'll never say. They're a closed
On vendredi 21 septembre 2012, SomeoneElse wrote:
> sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/248 because that poor guy
> > doesn't read english, was following what we've always done.
> Surely they're exactly the sort of person who needs to be told "whoa
> horsey
Question: I don't have iOS6 here. Is the map data the same as shown on
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/ ? (Choose "Apple iPhoto" on the combobox)
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:03 AM, pavithran wrote:
>
> > That raises some interesting questions
I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more
potential coastline errors in the new "Questionable" category. Questionable
shows coastline rings with possible problems. There are several different kinds
of problems that are shown in this way: a) Coastline rings that touc
2010-09-21 Jochen Topf
> I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more
> potential coastline errors in the new "Questionable" category.
Jochen, it is a nice addition.
Looking at the map, I see all of America coastline being tagged with Invalid
geometry.
Invalid
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Pierre Béland wrote:
> 2010-09-21 Jochen Topf
> > I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more
> > potential coastline errors in the new "Questionable" category.
>
> Jochen, it is a nice addition.
>
>
> Looking at the map,
2012-09-21 Jochen Topf
pb>> Invalid geometry definition : Invalid for some unspecified reasons. This
is never supposed to happen and must be fixed.
pb>> This definition is ambiguous to me. Do you mean that we should not see
this error or that we have to fix something.
> This is described a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more
> potential coastline errors in the new "Questionable" category.
Very nice. Thank you for this. The questionable category is pointing
out some reversed coastline ways
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Well, this time a
single import account has been registered per province with a single
person coordinating the (potential) imports in each province. The
assignments have been documented on the wiki. This is better but the
account names are still not directly linked wit
> From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:li...@letuffe.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 7:41 AM
> To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
>
> On vendredi 21 septembre 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi again,
>
> > This is not about "one
Hi all,
The schedule for State Of The Map US, Portland OR, Oct 13-14 is live
now on the web site!
http://stateofthemap.us/
It is going to be a jam packed couple of days with tracks covering
Switching to OSM, Cartography, Editors, Communities and pretty much
everything in between.
So if you were wa
2012-09-21 Lester Caine
<<
What I have been asking is how we can manage on-going imports of a
dataset that is being updated regularly. This is probably on 'off-line'
function, and could well be managed by the 'local chapter' on their own
computers. This is the 'process' I'm looking to be develop
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The schedule for State Of The Map US, Portland OR, Oct 13-14 is live
> now on the web site!
> http://stateofthemap.us/
> It is going to be a jam packed couple of days with tracks covering
> Switching to OSM, Cartography, Editor
2012/9/21 Bráulio :
> Question: I don't have iOS6 here. Is the map data the same as shown on
> http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/ ? (Choose "Apple iPhoto" on the combobox)
no, it is different. In the meantime I could take a look and there
doesn't seem to be OSM data in this map, at least from the copy
On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 01:10 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2012/9/21 Bráulio :
> > Question: I don't have iOS6 here. Is the map data the same as shown on
> > http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/ ? (Choose "Apple iPhoto" on the combobox)
>
>
> no, it is different. In the meantime I could take a look
> From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
>
> who last edited an object! ). Where the import HAS nice unique object
> identifiers things are a lot easier, but raw vector data like the French
> import, and I think the Spanish data y
Paul Norman wrote:
From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines proposal update
who last edited an object! ). Where the import HAS nice unique object
identifiers things are a lot easier, but raw vector data like the French
import, and I think the Spani
37 matches
Mail list logo
