Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Minh Nguyen
Vào lúc 05:42 2023-06-27, Yves via talk đã viết: That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started. Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure there's not another waste of energy beforehand. The mass edit and revert were performed by the same

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Yves via talk
That would be again discussing with the proponent, as Brian started. Taginfo chronology already show one mass edit and revert, best to make sure there's not another waste of energy beforehand. Yves Le 27 juin 2023 12:46:50 GMT+02:00, Marc_marc a écrit : >Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a écr

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
Since there seems to be community consensus for the removal, I have notified the main proponent at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130249355 And also opened a matching thread on the community forum. On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:07 AM Andy Townsend wrote: > On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M. S

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Marc_marc
Le 27.06.23 à 12:27, Yves via talk a écrit : Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano" a écrit : And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we find that we ag

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Yves via talk
Le 25 juin 2023 01:02:04 GMT+02:00, "Brian M. Sperlongano" a écrit : > >And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten >done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated >editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Andy Townsend
On 25/06/2023 00:02, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: And indeed, nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we find that we agreed to nothing, and the mapper has quietly continued to add this nons

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Jun 25, 2023, 03:08 by marc_m...@mailo.com: > Le 25.06.23 à 01:02, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit : > >> nine months later, we see that not only has the work not gotten done, but >> while we all squabbled away with our pet views about automated editing, we >> find that we agreed to nothing, and

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed bulk removal of service=driveway2

2023-06-27 Thread Warin
On 5/9/22 17:10, Minh Nguyen wrote: Vào lúc 09:57 2022-09-03, Tomas Straupis đã viết: 2022-09-03, št, 19:17 Mateusz Konieczny via talk rašė: as sole user of service=driveway2 declared that they are using it for all highway=service where no other service=* value fits, it can be cleanly removed