Re: [OSM-talk] anonymous notes spam?

Same here. Le ven. 20 juil. 2018 à 20:25, Johnparis a écrit : > When I click on the samples I get full notes. Perhaps there was a database > hiccup? > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 18:29 Andrew Hain > wrote: > >> Can we find out what software is being used to send these notes? >> >> -- >> Andrew >> -

Re: [OSM-talk] Mailing list security

uld be to unsubscribe you. Not really catastrophic 2017-11-25 12:55 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > On 2017-11-25 11:53, Éric Gillet wrote: > > This is non-ideal, but you were warned during your account creation that > this password is to be considered non-secure : > > > You may ent

Re: [OSM-talk] Mailing list security

2017-11-25 11:12 GMT+01:00 Colin Smale : > My point is that the email I received contained my password to that > account, in plain text! > > WTF#1: Why is it remembering the cleartext password and not a > non-reversible hash? > > WTF#2: Why is it sending my password around in the email? > > My fee

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-11-13 20:52 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend : > On 13/11/2017 19:36, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > > > That's why I think Sophox is a much better and safer alternative to > JOSM's autofixes. > > At the risk of repeating something that's been said multiple times > previously, with JOSM autofixes you're perf

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #379 2017-10-17-2017-10-23

2017-10-28 19:15 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > A quick note - since i think it is important to make this distinction: > > But the OSM wiki as a meta-project for documenting and communicating > about mapping is not a do-o-cracy on its own. You cannot simply invest > a lot of time in the wiki and

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #379 2017-10-17-2017-10-23

[Citation needed] More seriously, could you please list multiple objective instances of "net negative value" edits ? Let's not jump on the bandwagon of banning someone because some disagree with his contributions, based on this single issue presented in OSM weekly. 2017-10-28 12:06 GMT+02:00 And

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #379 2017-10-17-2017-10-23

2017-10-28 14:29 GMT+02:00 Ilya Zverev : > [Philippe Verdy's] number of edits makes his work virtually unverifyable > and unrevertable. > Without regard to the (objective?) quality of his work, you convey that he is to blame because of his important implication to the project ? AFAIK he does not

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-13 23:25 GMT+02:00 Yuri Astrakhan : > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each > suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a > good edit. > > For exampl

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-14 12:05 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > On Friday 13 October 2017, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review > > each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on

Re: [OSM-talk] An import in New Zealand, assistance requested

2017-08-31 21:56 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole : > > If there is problems with the data or what's being entered on OSM, we can > stop and think before continuing. > > Well it seems as if exactly -that- wasn't happening which is why this > thread was started in the first place. Seems however that the brakes

Re: [OSM-talk] An import in New Zealand, assistance requested

2017-08-31 16:55 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole : > Sorry for responding to this late. > > Just because a specific source has been legally "OK"ed doesn't imply > that an import of all the data from a specific source is warranted and > should continue on for all times. The import guidelines are silent on >

Re: [OSM-talk] "NRCS basic OSM training" - low quality changesets in Nepal

2017-06-23 0:34 GMT+02:00 Nicolás Alvarez : > > Ben .. you could try, say, bdiscoe@gmail.com and > bdiscoe.old...@gmail.com - they should both end up in you gmail account. > > Are you saying that if anyone emails nicolas.whate...@gmail.com it will > reach me? That... doesn't sound right. > Pl

Re: [OSM-talk] The Top Ten Tasks list

2017-04-07 12:11 GMT+02:00 David Earl : > The link https://pads.ccc.de/k4rlFOGIHb reports an invalid https > certificate! > Worksforme ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] New Overpass API v0.7.54 version

2017-04-04 6:47 GMT+02:00 Roland Olbricht : > Hello everybody, > > the blog > http://dev.overpass-api.de/blog/ > has not only new entries but now also an RSS feed: > http://dev.overpass-api.de/blog/rss.xml Thanks, it's a lot easier to follow the updates !

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Conflation Tool

Nice tool, thank you for making it ! Also python3 support is appreciated. Éric 2017-02-16 15:47 GMT+01:00 Ilya Zverev : > Hi everyone, > > I have just finished the conflation script, that would make importing a > set of points much easier. For example, when you have a GeoJSON of > McDonalds' res

Re: [OSM-talk] Analysis of usage of similar tags over time

2016-09-01 8:16 GMT+02:00 Oleksiy Muzalyev : > Could it be that there are only 104000 ATMs mapped in the whole world? I > mean, - is it really the data from the OSM database? > You can see on taginfo that there are indeed around 104k ATM on OSM : http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=atm

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-14 14:00 GMT+02:00 Richard Fairhurst : > Éric Gillet wrote: > > That would be slightly faster to execute than the first approach I was > > suggesting, but then how would you prove that you checked every > > and all features ? > > Well, the best way to prove tha

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-14 6:12 GMT+02:00 tuxayo : > On 13/07/2016 09:25, Éric Gillet wrote: > > I will summarise what course of action I think would be appropriate to > > follow : > > > > * It's not clear whether AE CoC terms are rules or simply guidelines > > o As

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-12 19:35 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend : > On 12/07/2016 17:29, Éric Gillet wrote: > > I've read through your posts in this thread, and while it's clear that you > have an issue with the way that things work now, I can't see what that > problem actually is.

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-12 14:35 GMT+02:00 Frederik Ramm : > > On 07/12/2016 03:03 AM, tuxayo wrote: > > The questions is how legitimate are they. To know if we can enforce them > > strictly. > > Enforcing anything "strictly" is likely to cause problems. Rules can > only be enforced strictly if they are so well wr

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-11 2:16 GMT+02:00 Frederik Ramm : > On 07/11/2016 02:02 AM, Éric Gillet wrote: > > If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the > > change, it is covered under the AE CoC. > > No, the document clearly states in the "Scope" sectio

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-11 11:28 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2016-07-11 2:02 GMT+02:00 Éric Gillet : > >> If you do a search-and-replace on 20 elements and review manually the >> change, it is covered under the AE CoC. I don't think of that as an >> advanced or uncomm

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

Hi Michael, 2016-07-11 0:08 GMT+02:00 Michael Reichert : > Hi Éric, > > Am 10.07.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Éric Gillet: > > In contrary to the Contributor Terms, these rules : > >- Are not shown to new contributors > > It is shown to new contributors, not directly but

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Automated edits code of conduct

2016-07-10 23:56 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > On Sunday 10 July 2016, Éric Gillet wrote: > > > > In contrary to the Contributor Terms, these rules : > > > >- Are not shown to new contributors > >- Are not accepted by new or existing contributors >

[OSM-talk] Automated edits code of conduct

Hello, OSM contributions must follow the Contributor Terms ; these therms are being shown to new users and they must explicitely accept them before they can start contributing. However, another distinct set of rules is also being enfor

Re: [OSM-talk] Mobile businesses

2016-06-16 20:17 GMT+02:00 john whelan : > Locally we're seeing the demise of the local bicycle store with its > mechanic but there are a least two cycle mechanics operating out of mobile > workshops. You ring or contact them via the Internet. > > Knowing that many in OSM indulge in cycling I'm

Re: [OSM-talk] International Womens Day - Mapping locations and dates of incidents on OpenStreetMaps

I don't think crime stats have their place in OSM, as they don't have a physical presence on the group, are highly dynamic, and somewhat subjective/local (some crimes in certain countries are not crimes in other). 2016-02-19 15:28 GMT+01:00 Mhairi O'Hara : > Hello, > > Sexual harrassment towards

Re: [OSM-talk] VisualEditor on the OSM wiki

I thought I missed the announcement, but looks like it was a secret gift from the wiki sysadmins ! Thank you and have a good 2016 :) > 2016-01-03 23:02 GMT+01:00 Rob Nickerson : > > Hi, > > > > Not sure when this happened (some time recently) but I wanted to thank > our > > wiki system admins fo

Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags

2015-05-06 15:33 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. : > > Btw anyone knows what phone=3631 is ? 3631 is the short (local) phone number to contact "La Poste", the postal services in France. The large number of occurences is from an opendata import. ___ talk mailing li

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam vs. Vandalism : Example and Future Procedure (Example from Israel)

A pull-request (by me) is still open about reporting changesets/diaries entries/users on the OSM, and a GSOC project is proposed for th

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam vs. Vandalism : Example and Future Procedure (Example from Israel)

OSM is not an advertisment tool. It is a geographical database. I'd say in this case delete the node and associated relations, as it seems the mapper have made no effort to try to enter relevant and standard information on OSM. But you're right there are some edits in grey-area, where the best cou

Re: [OSM-talk] This has to stop: User Diaries Spam

I know a friend who have some ruby knowledge, and will try to implement something. It seems that there already is a "moderator" user role , so it should not be that hard to do. On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4

Re: [OSM-talk] This has to stop: User Diaries Spam

It still continue, and some spam is getting through, not deleted by admins. Would it be possible that I volunteer for deleting incoming spam on user diaries ? I could also put up a webpage listing the bans acted, allowing full transparency if neccessary. ___

Re: [OSM-talk] This has to stop: User Diaries Spam

It still continue, and some spam is getting through, not deleted by admins. Would it be possible that I volunteer for deleting incoming spam on user diaries ? I could also put up a webpage listing the bans acted, allowing full transparency if neccessary. ___

Re: [OSM-talk] cycle.travel bike routing for Western Europe

It hasn't been done on osrm.at because each routing profile require a separate instance of OSRM. The bicycle profile is available in OSRM for quite some time now, but I've yet to find a public OSRM instance with bicycle or foot routing... On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:00 PM, wrote: > Am 18.07.2014