=unpaved as a dashed line.
An example
http://osm.org/go/eutNf8ah--
I can't speak for the stylesheet maintainers but I also suspect this
is very much a patches welcome situation.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
. It makes contributors uncomfortable and makes it much more
difficult to share code between different projects.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
pretty easy to see that two groups of people trying to reach the
same goal with different licenses within the same database is going to
cause friction.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
people want to verify the data in an
efficient and systematic way then they they need to organise between
themselves and store information outside the database. It's a problem
that needs a general solution not a single tag that works in a very
specific case.
--
DavidD
2009/10/3 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
On 03/10/09 00:49, DavidD wrote:
Just start making the decisions and build the thing on top of OSM. It
wouldn't even be that difficult to start off. Just take planet.osm and
strip unapproved tags and build up from there.
So OSM is in a state
. It will have to be built up along side at least until it is shown
to be an improvement. That's if it even needs to be part of OSM at
all. If mapnic can run off the planet and diffs why couldn't this?
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk
they realise their
vote doesn't really count for much.
Mapping is enough work as it is without having to frequently check
proposals in the wiki.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
but got no replies.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-usb/2008/11/16/4135424
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
the problem with admitting this and coming up with a decent
subjective scheme. I think you probably would get a lot of the benefit
of an objective scheme with a fraction of the effort.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
to be? IMO the effort to get it on map features means the tag
now fails to solve the original problem.
Is trying to get specialised tags through a majority vote ever going
to work? Would it not have been better just to come up with a tag,
document it on the wiki and start using it?
--
DavidD
the useless tags.
I suspect the same mistake is being made here. The validators will get
smarter and the tags will end up pointless or harmful. Tagging for
validators should IMO be viewed the same as tagging for renderers.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
2008/10/15 Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has anyone written a program like this; either with that sort of data
format or solving that problem?
Have you seen Gosmore?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Gosmore
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing
think deleting a horse=bridleway tag from a bridleway is
really helping that much. Probably the tag was entered by mistake but
why delete it? Is it really causing any harm?
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
/39116477hh7.png
Either because I got lost or because it was easier to walk around the
boundary of a field than straight across it.
I don't think gpx traces contain anywhere near enough info on their
own to produce a decent map.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing
people on a wiki voted for another set of tags? When practically
nobody bothers to vote and the losing side can just ignore the result
what is the point of voting?
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi
track list for a period of time. If no objections are made during this
time period the value will be moved into the approved features list.
--
DavidD
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
16 matches
Mail list logo
