etmap.org/wiki/User:NE2/classification_FAQ#Why_can.27t_we_use_functional_classification.3F
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trunk_road
[4] https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/infrastructure/nfn/index.htm
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
s twice:
- in Isolda della Scala: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/45.2730/11.0218
- in Mirandola: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/44.8679/11.0485
As in the other example, no such changes in Google Maps, Here.com or Waze.
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
___
uot;harmonising" European roads will
>>>> likely get you banned. I don't want to sound like I'm threatening you, but
>>>> I've probably spent all the time I'm willing to spend on arguing with some
>>>> random person who wants to break our local r
reak our local road classification system
>>> "because it will look nicer".
>>>
>>> On 24 February 2018 at 07:59, djakk djakk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but this rendering does not change when a road crosses a border ^^
>>>>
As an exercise (and I'm curious about your thoughts on this), I found
the main routes between place=city within Czechia (didn't have time to
include cities in adjacent countries, bear that in mind).
Here's the result [1] using the old colour scheme (motorway=blue,
trunk=green, primary=red; with a
for official
>> > classification where needed.
>> >
>> > I've created this page:
>> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_classes
>> > Feel free to add your region!
>> >
>> > PS: +1 to Michael's point about not changing classifi
point about not changing classifications in countries
> with an official system.
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 23:06, Michael Andersen wrote:
>>
>> On fredag den 23. februar 2018 15.31.37 CET Fernando Trebien wrote:
>>
>> > Assuming the map is correctly classified in
I don't intend to.
But I still wonder why they are desirable.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Michael Andersen wrote:
> On fredag den 23. februar 2018 15.31.37 CET Fernando Trebien wrote:
>
>> Assuming the map is correctly classified in Europe, I'm seeing many
>>
ce using another criterion
instead of population.
> Trunk, primary,
> or secondary?
>
> --
> Mark
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Fernando Trebie
aze actually follows local administration.
>>
>>
>> Long story short: I am strongly against deploying this system in countries
>> with a functioning official classification system.
>>
>> On 23 February 2018 at 18:06, Fernando Trebien
>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:31 PM, Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> Assuming the map is correctly classified in Europe, I'm seeing many
> fragments of motorways and trunks all over the map. Is this an
> artifact of local definitions? Or is it intentional and desirable?
I should note that I
OK for roads?
>
> Even Waze actually follows local administration.
>
>
> Long story short: I am strongly against deploying this system in countries
> with a functioning official classification system.
>
> On 23 February 2018 at 18:06, Fernando Trebien
> wrote:
>>
>
don't touch the countries where there is no doubt about what class
>> any given road is.
>> Happy mapping!
>>
>> On 22 February 2018 at 16:20, djakk djakk wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I totally agree with you, the definition you pro
ki/%E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF%E7%B1%BB%E5%9E%8B
[16]
https://wiki.waze.com/wiki/%E3%80%8C%E9%81%93%E8%B7%AF%E7%A8%AE%E5%88%A5%E3%80%8D
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 99962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
/2013-December/016007.html
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
catch up with all of
> the people who want to be consulted but don't read the mailing list.
>
> In short, if you believe this is easy, do it. Otherwise, don't underestimate
> other people's tasks.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Fernando Trebien
> wrote:
&g
cussed. The only reason I don't set out and
try writing my own editor (which is a pretty big undertaking) is that
my country's map still needs lots of data, and my country's community
still needs lots of support. Potlatch, iD and JOSM have solved that,
mostly. All I ask for is a m
or cyclic
references woud be necessary to represent any information. (Not
suggesting the the server should implement that check.)
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> On 6/27/2015 1:14 PM, Fernando Trebien wrote:
>>
>> Actually no, the server checks for circu
t routes
have no other better solution, and while boundaries could be expressed
as simple areas (closed ways), that would cause two problems:
- lots of space lost in the server by replicating point references
- editing usability while handling areas that share edges (not uncommon)
[1] http://tagin
Relations cannot be abolished (there is no other way to
represent bus/car/hiking/boat routes, or hollow polygons). Ways, in
theory, can.
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"Nullius in verba."
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Sorry for the spam, apparently this problem is only affecting me.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Fernando Trebien
wrote:
> Am I the only person getting a weird Adobe Flash Player message while
> trying to access any page of the wiki? Tried two different computers
> and one mobile ph
Am I the only person getting a weird Adobe Flash Player message while
trying to access any page of the wiki? Tried two different computers
and one mobile phone, same result.
The download link redirects to a ZIP file in some suspicious IP
address. Seems hacked.
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962
at=-15.7896&zoom=9&layers=B00T
>
> And this, does not aggregate any information, why it should be there?
> http://tah.openstreetmap.org/MapOf/?lat=-15.7896&long=-47.8221&z=9&w=1280&h=1024&format=jpeg
> http://www.webshots.com/
>
> _______
reetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
--
Fernando Trebien
+55 (51) 9962-5409
"The sp
ever more detailed rules. It's not a German project ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
Under which license would you share it? And why?
OSM offers you so many opportunities, I wonder what could be missing.
On Mar 13, 2014 11:28 AM, "Alex Barth" wrote:
> Hello everyone -
>
> I've been sitting on writing about the detrimental effects of
> OpenStreetMap's share-alike license (ODbL) f
on (by a user) is a perfect teaching
> opportunity.
> The moment someone deletes part of a boundary relation,
> is the perfect teaching moment about boundary relations.
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://
nd should not be
necessary). I've also been recommending people to use multipolygons
only when extremely necessary. I shouldn't be recommending neither of
the two, but I see no other way to prevent what I've pointed out.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Pieren wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2
enstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=24381
I'm sure that this little thing would solve most of the major problems
with relations in iD: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/1461
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:49 PM, malenki wrote:
> On 14.02.2014 16:54, Fernando Trebien wrote:
>
>> My main
Potlatch will not be the default editor for much longer (iD will be) so
purely beginner-focused feature requests are largely out of scope now.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/4902#comment:1>
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/>
OpenStreetMap is a free
30 matches
Mail list logo
