On 4/30/2014 11:38 AM, William Morris wrote:
Is there a general OSM policy on marking sidewalks as highway=footway?
User dolphinling appears to have gone crazy in downtown Burlington,VT
tracing the sidewalks and calling them footways.
It does add a great deal of clutter to those maps that
On 4/2/2014 12:29 PM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
What file format is the defakto standard. Is GTFS the solution
and one day all data consumers for public transport will use GTFS?
GTFS is the most popular standard, and nearly a universal way to
represent public transport route and timetable
It's always a shock to find anyone using OSM maps and I'm staring at
some data I've worked on. A regional gas station chain uses OSM in its
location maps:
http://www.quiktrip.com/
(An example ZIP would be 29301 in Location if the map doesn't come up)
On 1/16/2014 12:16 AM, James Mast wrote:
Anyways guys, post what you think should be done here so I can get back
to the DWG on this subject. (I'm personally all for the reverting of
the highway=xxx upgrades this user has done only and not a full scale
revert of all his changesets as he did do
On 1/12/2014 9:47 AM, Randy Meech wrote:
so I've been experimenting with putting OSM data (US
only for now) into Elasticsearch.
Looks fantastic! One corner case that would be nice to handle is
searching for a street with directional without the directional.
Example: North Laurens
On 12/12/2013 11:50 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Another option is to spend time to collect address data from local
municipalities and work on methodically importing them. I started this
process and have collected a couple hundred address datasets here:
Are all those negotiated as OSM
On 12/11/2013 11:07 AM, fly wrote:
If you keep on adding both schemes simultaneously you will not notice
the problem and there will be no reason for developers to adjust the
software.
One of the problems in this situation is the map rendering developers
have not taken an interest in the new
On 12/11/2013 10:49 AM, Will Skora wrote:
I know there's taginfo (including one for the US!
taginfo.openstreetmap.us) but unfortunately, it doesn't let you find
out what tag combinations are being used with a name=* (For example,
finding what tag is used most often with name=Dollar-General).
On 12/9/2013 6:52 AM, Gilles Baumgartner wrote:
Is it ok to *add* the legacy tag
highway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=bus_stop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
to be at the same time compliant with the new tags but still make the
renderer show the
On 12/9/2013 12:42 AM, James Mast wrote:
So, does anybody else agree with me on this subject of primary
overload in South Carolina? If so, how do we go about fixing this with
a reasonable approach? Looking at some of the history of some of the
ways, it seems that only one user was doing the
On 12/4/2013 9:07 PM, Kam, Kristen -(p) wrote:
James,
I located NAIP imagery for the state of North Carolina.
That prompted my recall of an open NC state-run offleaf imagery source.
It worked in JOSM back in 2010. I see that they have updated some
coastal imagery in 2012; I'm not sure
On 12/3/2013 6:34 PM, Jo wrote:
Would it be useful to add all the starting times/ending times as well
for a given route? This can be different depending on
weekdays/Saturdays/Sundays/weekdays during short school
holidays/weekdays during long school holidays. How would we indicate
that
In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this
year; within the last month or so.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 12/1/2013 5:32 PM, Jo wrote:
Hmm, I was thinking of staying more or less within the lines of what we
have now, but take away the burden of 10, 20, 70 relations on the same
piece of road.
I'm just curious - what type of data consumer could use information
from OSM which contains 70 routes
On 11/17/2013 5:55 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea to automatically remove symbol=.
+1 - as a manually added tag, removing the tag would be destroying
hand-acquired data. And just because a known shield renderer doesn't
use it today, doesn't mean future renderers
On 10/29/2013 9:14 PM, Mike N wrote:
The border between North Carolina and South Carolina has been
re-surveyed. A number of businesses and households have suddenly found
themselves on the 'other side' of the state line. I don't know if
they'll modify the border for those cases
On 11/3/2013 10:54 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
i've determined that a lot of the NY/PA border heading west
from the Delaware has issues where no one bothered to break
up and share the ways.
Or, in my case, since I have no access to the accurate and correct
border, and I have no idea where the
On 11/3/2013 12:55 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
what i favor is going to a multi layer approach where some
layers of OSM are ground verifiable things and others may
not be. a consumer could choose to use some layers, and
the admin boundaries (which are a real problem) can be
moved and we can
The border between North Carolina and South Carolina has been
re-surveyed. A number of businesses and households have suddenly found
themselves on the 'other side' of the state line. I don't know if
they'll modify the border for those cases, or if it will be some sort of
special
On 10/28/2013 12:36 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Looks like 2013 NAIP is in progress in Oklahoma right now.
Does anyone have a setup for NAIP that works in JOSM? I tried my old
direct link, as well as one that used to be available through
OSM-US/Telescience, and none are working at the moment.
On 10/19/2013 10:25 AM, Jason Remillard wrote:
But, my number one rule is that if there is a individual or group that
want to maintain a specific set of data in OSM (timezones, ancient
rail roads, protected zones in the ocean, etc), we should give them as
much latitude as possible to do it.
I
On 10/19/2013 12:20 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
Filters are your friend. That's why they exist. I hate seeing borders,
so I filter them out. I don't delete them.
Filters are our version of layering.
With one exception: if nodes are shared, I can't see the damage I
might be doing to another
There was a good question posted in the forum that I can't quite come up
with a solution or recommendation.
Re: place = locality in Las Vegas
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=22876
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 10/5/2013 1:51 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Can I just point out that the breadth of candidates this year is a very
pleasant surprise?
Agreed! It turned the voting into a challenging process.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 9/12/2013 9:37 AM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
I don't know how open their data is, but have you heard of waze? I just
stumbled onto it yesterday.
http://www.waze.com/
Google recently bought Waze, so the data is definitely not open. I now
see more local MapMaker activity, probably
On 8/21/2013 11:59 AM, Johan C wrote:
+ 1 as well. OSM is fortunate to have the Id developers on board.
Here also - I was happy to see a new mapper pop up in this lonely
corner of the map and make some quality contributions. The editor on
the changesets? iD , so in that case the goal of
On 7/1/2013 10:19 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
For those interested in highway shields:
Thanks for the update and for everyone's efforts!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On 6/27/2013 8:16 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
But given buildings plopped onto roads:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/16662943
I've been guilty of 'plopping buildings onto roads' myself, where the
driveway goes under a carport style roof. And being too lazy to split
the road at
On 6/21/2013 11:59 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
Looks nice so far. However, the state pages probably should pick up
subnetworks and the like (for example, Georgia's
spurs/loops/connectors, and the various Texas FM/RM/Loop/Spur/etc.)
like the US route one does(?).
Very nice - thanks for this.
On 6/21/2013 9:17 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
I realized only after last week's discussion about neighborhoods that
the hamlets (which are distinct from nehighborhoods) are the things
messing up the geocoder.
I would say not to touch any hamlets; let the locals fix them up
appropriately.
On 6/21/2013 1:42 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
there is no single solution to both of these problems. the current
handling of this in Nominatum is so far as i know focused on
admin boundaries, and will not handle the postal address case
properly.
so what do we mean by geocoding? what do we want it
On 6/18/2013 1:21 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
This look pretty well organized, but I know how wikis can be deceiving
like that.
Also, how is the situation on the state level? I notice that for some
states, there are no State Route relation pages.
On 6/16/2013 7:20 PM, Thomas Colson wrote:
Is it preferable to keep the original GNIS tags if updating a GNIS object in
OSM?
It's fine to leave or delete all GNIS tags. If creating an object
with an area, I just copy all GNIS tags and merge tags from duplicate
objects.
At one time,
On 6/17/2013 10:56 AM, Clifford Snow wrote:
At last years SOTM-US conference, USGS showed a pilot program using a
modified version of Potlatch2 to update GNIS database with volunteers.
If they use this plan, the id tag could be used to compare OSM with the
new data. It would us to compare the
On 6/14/2013 5:43 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
We do map proposed routes, we don't map for the renderer.
earlier
In which I would really prefer this be addressed as a rendering issue. I believe that's
the reasonable compromise, to highlight a margin-of-error area defined by another tag
On 6/12/2013 7:53 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
I'm
disappointed that the above recommendation didn't acknowledge that NE2
has done good work. I would say that on the whole his contributions in
terms of data are definitely a net positive, including a great deal of
geometry improvement, addition of new
On 6/11/2013 2:58 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
OSM has pretty poor neighborhood coverage in the US. We have around 1100
place=neighbo[u]rhood. Geonames has ten times that at 11,000 (feature
class P.PPLX - not sure if all of those are neighborhoods) and Zillow
has 7,000.
The TIGER import
On 6/8/2013 4:18 PM, KerryIrons wrote:
Here’re just some of the comments from OSM members:
I'll add my opinion that I don't see the need for route numbers to be
assigned to proposed routes. Dashed lines suffice for the purposes of
previewing a possible path.
(In which case, like
On 6/5/2013 10:27 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Not so long ago the maps used on AOL's patch properties were
OpenStreetMap based.
It really worked out well since so much of the content was locally
generated, wiki content
matched the wiki maps.
That changed... anyone know when or why?
My local
On 5/25/2013 6:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Also osm is indexed by search engines
To varying levels - I searched OSM for some unusual POI names from
January 2013, and they aren't indexed. I did notice some content
indexed from 2010.
___
On 5/16/2013 1:33 PM, amy.dani...@gvltec.edu wrote:
I wanted to introduce myself – I am Amy Daniels and I am a GIS
Instructor with Greenville Technical College in South Carolina. I am
interested in keeping OpenStreetMap Data for our college campuses as
up-to-date and complete as possible. I
On 5/8/2013 10:38 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
OSM data and the OSM software ecosystem can play a huge role in this
context. Open source and open data has proven its worth in tearing down
institutional boundaries and making teams cooperate more efficiently
many times over.
That's the reason why we at
COUNTY -- is_in:county
CITY -- is_in:city
ACCESS -- wheelchair = yes|limited|no
BENCH -- bench = yes|no
LOCATIONID -- uta:stop_id
This looks good - I'm also glad that you also included the shelter tag
in the data because that's useful.
Re: is_in*; it seems to be redundant because the
On 4/19/2013 1:34 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
After more than a day of downtime caused by uncooperative domain hosts,
openstreetmap.us http://openstreetmap.us is coming back up - web site
and services hosted on the domain, including the TIGER overlay tiles.
The new DNS records may take a little
On 4/17/2013 9:24 AM, James Mast wrote:
Is anybody else having any problems right now accessing it in JOSM?
I keep getting Error messages instead of the tiles.
I'm also getting the error messages now.
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 4/12/2013 8:00 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Looking at the profiles of nearby mappers displayed on my profile page's
map, I am astonished to find that most of them have made zero edits.
Those people went through the effort of registering (some even added an
avatar picture) but then did not
On 3/19/2013 1:48 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
I'll have some free time later this week, maybe I'll look into
generating my own overlay tiles.
You could also create your own overlay using OpenLayers or Leaflet; then
the relation could use any tagging that describes it without showing as
a
On 3/16/2013 5:06 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
I'm surprised by how bad the NHD data is. I downloaded some of it in
.OSM format, and my casual hand digitization off Bing maps is much
better. If I say so myself, which I do.
That's not surprising if they last updated the NHD data between 1990
and
On 3/11/2013 10:10 PM, Eric Fischer wrote:
I would like to update OpenStreetMap with as many of the corrections
that have been made to TIGER as can be applied to Open StreetMap without
altering anything that has been edited directly in OSM.
Thanks for coming up with this; I've been hoping
Congratulations to Simon Poole for this interview!
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss_news/The_globe,_mapped_by_you.html?cid=35084414link=tdj
A map of the world, by the world, for the world – that’s what
Swiss-based Openstreetmap chairman Simon Poole and a global network of
more than a million
On 2/25/2013 10:42 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
On the wiki for the public transport routes, it says not to use the roles,
so that is what I'd been doing. Here is a link, 2nd paragraph under route
direction:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport#Route
I suppose
On 2/25/2013 8:30 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
Elliott Pack will talk about mapping bus routes in Baltimore. Swing by!
Great presentation; I couldn't manage to get my video chat working,
but have one comment.
Re: Bus Route relations way members and the negative recommendation in
the Wiki
On 2/23/2013 8:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
and eventually with the public_transport-scheme you'd
also need an explicit relation for what can be easily accomplished by
software (projecting the bus stop to the stop position on the road).
It depends on the eventual use - if it's only to
On 2/21/2013 5:05 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Curious why someone would keep this information to themselves rather
than aiding others in improving the map.
In my case, it's sheer laziness. I would also prefer to block out
sections around my immediate home base, but have not found an easy way
On 2/10/2013 6:12 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
So he's conveniently ignoring the left turn only arrow there preventing
a straight-on movement?
I would just observe that the red line can be seen as a large version
of the white left turn arrow above it.(Other than that, no opinion).
On 1/18/2013 3:32 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
This sounds interesting, what is it?
I think he's referring to:
http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/
https://code.launchpad.net/~asciiphil/osm-shields/trunk
By the way, any thoughts on what it'd take to port this stuff to Carto? [1]
[1]
On 1/17/2013 10:10 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
I did ask, what it would take to get you to hold a local Mappy Hour in
your town? That was never answered. So, I ask again, What would it
take?
More mappers. I've tried everything I could think of to get others
interested, but have given up
On 1/8/2013 4:18 PM, Elliott Plack wrote:
Just an FYI/general info announcement. I'm working with fellow mapper
MDroadshttp://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mdroads(and any other OSM
editors of course) to map bus routes of Maryland Transit Administration bus
lines throughout the Baltimore region
On 1/6/2013 7:30 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
This could be achieved e. g. by overlaying a light, opaque OSM highway layer
with a contrasting TIGER layer, only exposing TIGER 12 geometry where it
differs from OSM.
Here is a TIGER 12 vs OSM comparison. They cyan inner arc exists in
TIGER 12 but
On 1/6/2013 7:30 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
This could be achieved e. g. by overlaying a light, opaque OSM highway
layer with a contrasting TIGER layer, only exposing TIGER 12 geometry
where it differs from OSM.
Oops, forgot the link:
http://greenvilleopenmap.info/TIGER12vsOSM.jpg
Here is a
On 1/6/2013 7:30 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
This could be achieved e. g. by overlaying a light, opaque OSM highway layer
with a contrasting TIGER layer, only exposing TIGER 12 geometry where it
differs from OSM.
I like the idea of a TIGER 07 vs 12 comparison only being used as a
trigger. If
On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Mike N wrote:
I like the idea of a TIGER 07 vs 12 comparison only being used as a
trigger. If you compare TIGER 12 vs OSM, it will highlight all the
TIGER 07 artifact roads that were removed because they were in error or
no longer exist, but are still often in TIGER 12
On 1/5/2013 1:37 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
I try not to bother putting in the placename or the thing I
modified. Both of those things they can figure out from using the
changeset browser. Instead, I try to say why I made the change.
Conversely, I do try to include the place name if it is new or
On 1/2/2013 2:16 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
in my experience, deprecated is a pretty official declaration that
something shouldn't
be done/used anymore. java developers like me are quite accustomed to
seeing
APIs we use suddenly coming up deprecated, leading us to scramble to
the docs
to see what
On 12/11/2012 1:49 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Interested to hear what experiences other mappers have had in other
parts of the country.
My county has virtually the same copyright, and sells a GIS DVD for
$500. For the time being, I have given up the idea of any import - the
biggest gain
On 11/29/2012 2:18 PM, Jim McAndrew wrote:
From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking
roads with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway,
maybe they should be?
I do this is if there is a 'significant impact' on routing
(subjective, I know). Some
We certainly need to take our time before importing addresses. I
considered the problem of manually collecting the city and concluded
that it is not possible short of opening mailboxes and reading the
address on any mail (highly illegal), or knocking on every door to
confirm the mailing
On 11/29/2012 10:32 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there a compelling reason not to get parcels instead? As parcels
change shape, the centroid can be easily interpolated. It's not really
possible to extrapolate geometry from centroid, however.
It would be useful to navigate to address points -
A big thanks to Matthias and anyone else involved in setting things up -
this was a big result for the US. I chose that weekend to pay
attention to the 'Red headed stepchild' of the next county, and imported
newly constructed roads from TIGER, and got to some long-needed routing
fixes.
On 11/25/2012 8:20 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
however, should we perhaps also run expansion over the addr:street tags at
the same time?
No objection here - we can expand the addr:street tag based on its
proximity to the actual street, and therefore the root TIGER tags that
ensure a quality
On 11/20/2012 11:04 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
tiger:county
tiger:zip_left
tiger:zip_right
These are the only ones I use regularly, although there are probably
sources to derive them. I also remove reviewed when I have verified
the geometry and general road type, although others use the
WOOT! We may have hooked a new US mapper because of the shield
rendering on the test shield development server!
That leads to a related question - what is the best way to tag for
modified state routes. For example in South Carolina:
State route 49 - US:SC , ref = 49(That is
On 11/13/2012 10:15 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Looks like someone mapped a haymaze.
In some cases there is large scale crop art, designed for aerial
viewing only:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_art
___
Talk-us mailing list
On 11/12/2012 8:56 AM, Russ Nelson wrote:
What if the Presets/Annotation/Addresses dialog box wasn't modal (like
the relations editor, where it lets you continue to edit), and had a
Apply and Increment button? Then you could go down a row of houses
(once you've verified that they're
On 11/12/2012 1:05 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
The hangout / youtube links will be posted on the Google+ event page
shortly before we start.
I won't be able to attend, but if I could make it, I'd ask if there
was anything to do as a volunteer to help set up the server with US
Shield
On 11/5/2012 8:15 AM, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
If they can find views (maybe even searches) for 1 or multiple areas and
correlate those with 1 or multiple changesets on OSM they have the proof
they want.
And Google could always use Photoshop to plant a few 'Easter eggs'
with fake names in
Overall I like what I see in the MapRoulette. The challenge is that it
becomes difficult to monitor the local area. Most changes that appear
in the history have 5-15 pages of ways listed, scattered across the
country or world. I reviewed several in my area and found one that
Bing imagery
On 10/31/2012 10:22 AM, Tiziano D'Angelo wrote:
Quite cool. I saw the note on the left bar. So, did you set it up as an
alternative to the official bus service information? I may do the same
in my city, Padova, Italy, where the bus company provides quite a lame
service concerning information on
On 10/31/2012 11:24 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Is it possible to add one of the public transport maps as a layer?
I did not have much time now to test, but obviously I missed useful
locations and got no trips planned because my end points aren't safe
(only connected to highway or sth. like that).
FYI - I've finished the testing for my local instance of OpenTripPlanner
[1] and it's ready to go live.
The code I used to create the GTFS from OSM data is in SVN:
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/utils/export/OSM2GTFS/ - still
very fragile, and not very informative when it doesn't
On 10/27/2012 7:28 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Before I bring this up on the imports list, I thought I'd ask the US
community about their opinion about importing the data.
I agree that it is a good idea to import NHD. It is an asset when
doing surveys and updates: you can review it for any
On 10/27/2012 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On the other hand, I believe NHD should not be imported into US
OSM Edit deserts. It's best to wait until there is a community
who wants an NHD import. In the meantime, the NHD for that area
may be updated and when it is finally
On 10/25/2012 12:34 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
We're
talking about promoting a US project like fixing TIGER deserts / Ghost
towns[1] for the next NOTLM (date to be set). Good idea?
I would say that this is a good idea. If a curious person (non-OSM
contributor) were to look at a garbled
On 10/19/2012 11:48 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
we got some. Carl Frantzen of Talking Points Memo asked me about coming
to SOTM US and
i urged him to do so. he did and here we are:
That was fantastic coverage; looking forward to the next 2 parts. I
wonder how far the series will reach into
On 10/20/2012 5:55 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i've just written this up in a blog posting. The lightning talk was
entitled
Maps for First Responders.
Great post! The politics are the hardest part of the process - the
Trimet-Portland program is a great way to use OSM, and I hope it can
find
On 10/18/2012 3:57 PM, Frank Steggink wrote:
Does nobody know about the -Djosm.home=dir parameter you can pass to
JOSM when starting up? It can be put easily in a shortcut.
The difficulty is that any JOSM customization (styles, plugins,
preferences) becomes spread among multiple accounts
On 10/18/2012 4:48 PM, Andrew Guertin wrote:
The most notable example of this is North Willard Street[2]. It is part
of US Route 7, but as can be seen with Bing Imagery, it is narrow, made
narrower by street parking on both sides, and is controlled by stop
signs. Similarly, Main Street is part
On 10/16/2012 7:34 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Maybe they just have an army of tracers, but automation seems more like
how Google solves problems.
Is there any Smartphone coverage for those areas? Google can track
via their Smartphone apps. By generating tracks from the owner's
On 10/2/2012 11:15 AM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
Regarding TIGER county connectivity; since the last OSMI update GA, AL
and northern MS have had county boundary issues cleaned.
What's left is KY, LA, AR, southeastern TX, and portions of VA, TN, and
KS. States such as ME and southeastern MA
On 9/30/2012 12:10 AM, Brian May wrote:
And maybe have different remapatron modes, e.g. crazy tiger mode,
streets with no name mode, and empty hoods mode.
Yes - The empty hoods mode lends itself to importing the empty hood
directly from the TIGER data. We all complain about TIGER errors,
On 9/28/2012 11:28 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
That would be a pretty complex query, for the following reasons:
* Similar naming may be obvious to a human observer, but can be really
hard to detect algorithmically.
* Similar geometry can be hard to detect because of split / combined
ways so you
On 9/21/2012 3:12 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Begs the question - are any of the OSM routing options iPhone friendly?
GPS Nav/2 from Skobbler ($): Can do offline routing
OpenTripPlanner for transit on the iPhone - I'm guessing about 2 months
yet until a release
On 9/19/2012 6:29 PM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
Or to be more precise: you need to use a lot of effort and check all
versions of an object (this means: the whole planet) whether it once had
the source=cadastre tag. But thats a lot of work to do. Much (!) more
easy to identify all the object is if
On 9/18/2012 7:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
well, not sure where this comes from and if it makes sense: I don't
see a real obstacle as email addresses are not a scarse ressource (you
get as many as you like for free), but I agree that it seems to be
better to allow the same email address
On 9/18/2012 1:56 PM, Pieren wrote:
The uploads we are talking are normally done with JOSM after the
integration with the existing data and validation.
How do you recover from a failed JOSM upload when working with large
datasets?
___
talk
On 9/12/2012 11:19 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
what i recall is that NE2 likes the appearance of bare route numbers and
most of his ref
tags have no prefix at all (see FL, PA, NJ among other states where he
did a lot of this.)
I've seen a number of people who put the bare number in the ref tag
On 9/13/2012 1:15 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
Most of the ones in Kansas are actually KS XX - might have something
to do with me having done most of them and I consider national
consistency to be of value
I would agree with national consistency. There will always be
contention - in SC, the DOT
Just a note to those participating with the awesome Remap-a-tron tool -
please take time to look up or verify the road name from TIGER.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_2011
Use the URLs in the section Tiles in Potlatch or JOSM.You can
also substitute the 2012 for 2011 in the
On 9/10/2012 9:44 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
What is your browser? Can you inspect the network activity on the
page? Arehttp://lima.schaaltreinen.nl/remappingservice/ and
http://lima.schaaltreinen.nl/remappingservice/count called and do they
return valid (geo)JSON?
I'll summarize the trace
On 9/10/2012 4:50 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Mweh. I suck at apache configuration. Try again, please?
Success here!
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
201 - 300 of 770 matches
Mail list logo
