Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-newbies] avoid repeating the name tag twice

2009-05-04 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, I think that is OK. It is at least how I am mapping in similar cases. regards Nick Black wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Was there an agreed answer to this issue. > > I want to tag an address in Kyiv using both the English and Ukrainian > street names. > > Sounds like I can do: > > addr:street:en

Re: [OSM-talk] Rough Tracks

2009-04-20 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, I used grade5 or grade4 in this case, depending how bad the whole is. The surface has been inserted far later and seems me redundant and less usable for routing with weighting. regards Pierre-André kaerast wrote: > Claudius wrote: > >> "Down-grade" them to grade4 or grade5. It's not your jo

Re: [OSM-talk] power=line

2009-03-23 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Ed Loach wrote: > Hatto wrote: > >> According to the "map features" the tag power=line may be >> completed by a tag >> "wires=single|double|triple|quad". I have some doubts about the >> meaning of >> "wires" in this case. "Map features" say about the "wires" tag: >> >>> Number of wires per power c

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-newbies] avoid repeating the name tag twice

2009-03-15 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi > 1) This proposal will not help the Brussels map, where a similar need exists. > In Brussels they want the default map to show street names in France and > Dutch. > see > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.77218&lon=4.38126&zoom=15&layers=B000FTTT > for > a road with these tags: >na

Re: [OSM-talk] Multilingual map

2009-03-14 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
>>> With my first go a couple of weeks back for 8 languages I did do >>> fallback to at least 'name' using views as suggested on the wiki, >>> setting this up for 40 languages however was somewhat less trivial >>> and I felt that there would be a benefit to being able to display >>> languages with

Re: [OSM-talk] Multilingual map

2009-03-14 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, great stuff... > With my first go a couple of weeks back for 8 languages I did do > fallback to at least 'name' using views as suggested on the wiki, > setting this up for 40 languages however was somewhat less trivial and I > felt that there would be a benefit to being able to display languag

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-newbies] avoid repeating the name tag twice

2009-03-14 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, sorry, I have been of for some days.. > What Pierre-André has suggested though, seems to be different to "name" > in that rather than having name:local contain the name, what he's > actually suggesting is that the value of name:local refers to the local > language, perhaps better named as name

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-newbies] avoid repeating the name tag twice

2009-03-07 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
[...] > Hi, > > > In Israel we try to tag all names with "name","name:he","name:en", > and we > > put the same value in "name" and "name:he". > > For example: > > name=1234 > > name:he=1234 > > name:en=abcd > > Is there a feature recognized by the renderer

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM license change: A license to kill? -> How to make a nightmare come true!

2009-03-05 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
SteveC wrote: > On 4 Mar 2009, at 23:42, Nop wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> SteveC schrieb: >>> To me this is similar to "ignorance of the law is no defence". The >>> data, people and facts are out there and it's not our job to serve >>> them up to you in the specific best way you want. We will help

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=vending_machine AND amenity=post_box: what about?

2008-09-09 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
vegard a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 06:40:59AM -0700, Karl Newman wrote: >>> So personally I think duplicate keys would be the easiest and best way to >>> tag such double-uses. >>> >>> Norbert >>> >> Just make two different nodes, each located closest to the amenity >> concerned. There's not

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=vending_machine AND amenity=post_box: what about?

2008-09-07 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, vegard a écrit : >>> Currently, I have never seen a stamp vending machine without its post >>> box. That is why I intended to mark these with something like: >>> >>> amenity=post_box >>> vending_machine=yes >>> > There will be a lot of such cases of things with dual use. I did send a ma

[OSM-talk] amenity=vending_machine AND amenity=post_box: what about?

2008-09-02 Thread Pierre-André Jacquod
Hi, there is a proposal for vending_machine at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/vending_machine but there has been no vote for it. Is someone already using it? I have several cases where I have post boxes to map, with their stamp selling machine. Currently I have not yet