Bing is not supported by wmsplugin. It's currently supported either by
slippymap plugin or by imagery plugin which is combination of wmsplugin and
slippymap.
2010/12/2 Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
hi,
I have downloaded the josm-tested and josm-latest. In bing wms I get
this error:
PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http
discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
here is what frederik has to say. His endorsement is good enough for me
Forwarded Message
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688)
( http://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/josm-snapshot-3688.jar )
and an updated version of the slippy map plugin. Then go to Preferences
(F12) Slippy map and
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
Yes, see http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details.
Richard Fairhurst, seems to be in closer
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:07 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be
used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
Yes, see
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:07 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be
used
Hi,
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Adding source tags never hurts. I believe source=bing is what is sort of
agreed upon.
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at
Am Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2010 schrieb Jo:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to be added, but I managed to get it to work.
So now i'm mapping all those rivers/streams and the landuses that are
almost impossible to accomplish otherwise. Should I add source
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
Am Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2010 schrieb Jo:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to be added, but I managed to get it to work.
So now i'm mapping all those rivers/streams and the landuses that are
almost impossible to accomplish otherwise. Should I add source
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the
On 1 December 2010 14:55, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs
to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 14:55, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs
to
be added, but I managed to get it to
On 01.12.2010 13:59, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Adding source tags never hurts. I believe source=bing is what is sort
of agreed upon.
Is source=bing verified?
Else it is pretty bad to start mapping
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Is source=bing verified?
Else it is pretty bad to start mapping
As already posted, there is no formal requirement in the Bing licence to use
a source tag, but it's good OSM practice anyway. FWIW Potlatch 2 has
source=Bing as the preset tag.
Richard
--
View this
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:26 +0200, Nic Roets wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
It was posted by Steve Coast, Chairman of OSMF and a Microsoft
employee. So
the chances of Microsoft suing us for taking that info at face value
is
zero.
well the
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
your endorsement would be good enough for me
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Sebastian Klein wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
Kenneth,
On 12/02/2010 04:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
your endorsement would be good enough
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:52 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Kenneth,
On 12/02/2010 04:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose
-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688)
( http://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/josm-snapshot-3688.jar
.
Frank
- Forwarded message from basti...@googlemail.com -
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688
basti...@googlemail.com -
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
gebouwen vormen mooie referentiepunten. Ik hoop dat de Bing laag (kan
nog niet kijken hoe dit geïmplementeerd is) op dezelfde manier
verschoven kan worden.
Via de slippymapplugin kOn je niet verschuiven, maar wie weet is dat in de
versie met Bing support wel geregeld. Hopelijk.
Ik heb het
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost over het gebruik van Bing via de WMS plugin:
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
html:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wmsplugin/VirtualEarthSat.html?
This lets you
: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:17 PM
To: talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Wel erg gaaf zeg.
IK WIL AAN DE SLAG, Ahh
Wie kan mij vertellen hoe ik die kaart in JOSM als SlippyMap kan
verschuiven ten opzichte van de
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost over het gebruik van Bing via de WMS plugin:
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
html:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wmsplugin/VirtualEarthSat.html?
Let wel op
helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost
2010/12/1 Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info
Ik heb overigens in Spasnje langs de Costa Brava gekeken en daar merkte ik
op dat de low level images er nog niert zijn, of niet weergegeven worden. Er
komt dan een fototoestel te staan op een grijs vlak. Jammer.
Er zijn niet wereldwijd hoge
me hiermee helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op
me hiermee helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds
: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
2010/12/1
the environment.*
*Van:* talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:
talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org] *Namens *Martijn van Exel
*Verzonden:* Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:45 PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now
Exel
*Verzonden:* Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:45 PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
Is there any info when the Bing imagery will become available for tracing?
I know there was a Potlatch proof-of-concept but haven't heard much after
that.
Really eager to use it...
Greets,
Floris
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Friday 26 November 2010 13:42:34 Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Is there any info when the Bing imagery will become available for tracing?
When the lawyers at MS give the OK to a formal statement. AFAIK everyone at
bing is OK with it, but the statement-slash-agreeement-slash-whatever has to
go
When the lawyers at MS give the OK to a formal statement. AFAIK everyone
at
bing is OK with it, but the statement-slash-agreeement-slash-whatever has
to
go through legal.
Hopefully Legal won't decide that it is unacceptable.
___
talk mailing
Hey Floris,
What I heard from it is that after the weekend (before the weekend there was
smth about days of in the USA?) the legal people are going to look at it so
that we don't need to expect that we can start before the middle of next
week.
So AFAIK hold on a bit.
Regards,
Frank
2010/11/26
I believe the powers that be wanted to get some legal details straightened
out before they made things live. Considering that it is a holiday weekend
here in the US, that isn't going going to happen until monday at the
earliest.
Toby
On Nov 26, 2010 6:46 AM, Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Hopefully Legal won't decide that it is unacceptable.
The law is generally on the side of the big battalions
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 26 November 2010 13:05, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
When the lawyers at MS give the OK to a formal statement. AFAIK everyone at
bing is OK with it, but the statement-slash-agreeement-slash-whatever has
to
go through legal.
Hopefully Legal won't decide that it is unacceptable.
I
On 10-11-26 05:14 PM, Emilie Laffray wrote:
On 26 November 2010 13:05, Mike N. nice...@att.net
mailto:nice...@att.net wrote:
When the lawyers at MS give the OK to a formal statement.
AFAIK everyone at
bing is OK with it, but the
I must say, I haven't seen an open community this excited about an MS
announcement since ... umm .. forever !
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.orgwrote:
I suspect that if legal had decided it was unacceptable, Bing wouldn't have
released the statement in the
On 26 November 2010 22:56, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
The devil may still be in the detail. Such as limits on zoom levels and / or
coverage or even a requirement that tracing can only be done in Silverlight.
You mean moonlight ?
Anyways , just waiting for it to be available to trace via
http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/maps/archive/2010/08/02/bing-maps-adds-open-street-maps-layer.aspx
Unfortunately, the driving directions don't seem to be based on OSM data.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Nice to see they're trying. And it really is nice to see OSM getting
serious attention from the likes of microsoft. But silverlight = fail
from where I'm sitting (in front of a computer running Linux).
Comments indicate that moonlight doesn't work for their map stuff. Oh
well, better luck next
Anthony-6 wrote:
http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/maps/archive/2010/08/02/bing-maps-adds-open-street-maps-layer.aspx
I may be wrong, but it looks like they've taken a static dump of the tiles
from earlier today, rather than a dump of the data. Some changes I just made
today
On 4 August 2010 01:52, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I was hoping they'd give us an extra zoom level. Oh well.
I bet they have even resources to give z20 or z19 . C'mon Bing you can
rock ! Do something new :P
Regards,
Pavithran
--
pavithran sakamuri
http://look-pavi.blogspot.com
On 4 August 2010 07:34, pavithran pavithra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 August 2010 01:52, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
I was hoping they'd give us an extra zoom level. Oh well.
I bet they have even resources to give z20 or z19 . C'mon Bing you can
rock ! Do something new :P
On 4 August 2010 05:34, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
Actually, NearMap already do OSM tiles for the whole world, down to
z=24, if you really want to zoom in that far...
Cheers
Well first of all nice to see someone doing the whole world in Z=24 .
I am being a critic here to say that you
On 4 August 2010 09:06, pavithran pavithra...@gmail.com wrote:
I am being a critic here to say that you guys haven't properly styled
the mapnik to adapt for higher zoom levels .
We're continuing to work on the styles... as you say, it's hard to
check every line! One advantage we have is that we
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:53, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to compare some areas that still need to be mapped via Bing
maps.
There are comparison services that show Google and OSM maps side by side
of via transparent layers:
http://sautter.com/map/
Hi,
I would like to compare some areas that still need to be mapped via Bing
maps.
There are comparison services that show Google and OSM maps side by side
of via transparent layers:
http://sautter.com/map/
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/
But I haven't found any with Bing maps.
Bing has most
Valent Turkovic schrieb:
I would like to compare some areas that still need to be mapped via
Bing maps.
There are comparison services that show Google and OSM maps side by
side of via transparent layers:
http://sautter.com/map/
http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/
But I haven't found any
So Google and Yahoo allow this, only Bing doesn't?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:36 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is it explicitly forbidden in their
TCs?
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still be
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still
be forbidden.
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
John Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still
be forbidden.
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
These are from Multimap, and if you click the TCs on the bing mapping
page it takes you to
John Smith wrote:
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
Yes. Unless it's explicitly permitted, it's forbidden.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/5 maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com:
I hope they do, they have several areas with high-res that are not
covered in yahoo! in the Philippines
While Ms's and Multimap's reputation is that they would not allow that
if they have this option (Microsoft is a coin operated machine),
David Earl david at frankieandshadow.com writes:
These are from Multimap, and if you click the TCs on the bing mapping
page it takes you to Multimap's TC's:
http://www.multimap.com/about/legal_and_copyright/
and the imagery (Birds Eye View) is explicitly marked as copyright
below the
2009/8/5 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
and the imagery (Birds Eye View) is explicitly marked as copyright
below the image.
Seems pretty explicit to me.
Sure, if the aim is to copy the images. It is not so clear if the aim is to
interpret the imagery and make a map from the
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is it explicitly forbidden in their TCs?
Just announced by Microsoft, a new round of imagery update for Bing Map
(previously known as Virtual Earth): 41TB. From the blog entry: We
I hope they do, they have several areas with high-res that are not
covered in yahoo! in the Philippines
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:36 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is
201 - 270 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
