Follow-up:
Today Bing updated its imagery to g=3515. A lot of area in Taiwan is back,
especially Taipei - though some imagery in central Taipei is captured in
about 2005 :O
I don't know how the case changes in other regions. Take a look at the Bing
satellite today!
2015-04-11 17:59 GMT+08:00
Hi there,
sorry for hijacking the thread and changing the subject, but with the
recent update on Bing imagery many cities in Brazil (specially Rio de
Janeiro, where I live) the majority part of the city is covered with thick
clouds, I can't trace a thing anymore in some suburbs. Is there
Hi,
On 11 February 2012 01:33, Andrew Errington a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote:
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:03:01 Douglas Musaazi wrote:
Don't forget- sometimes Bing imagery is not accurately aligned. You should
double-check the alignment of the images before tracing from them. Potlatch
and
Hi all..
I think this is an opportunity that met a prepared mind. Just as we were
organizing a mapping reflection day at the Uganda Christian University in
Mukono this saturday 11th Feb 2012, we realized that the bing satellite
imagery was available for this area
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:03:01 Douglas Musaazi wrote:
snip
We shall also use this opportunity for the participants to re-map their
previous edits and correct those that could have been mapped wrongly, and
also agree to the new osm odbl licence.
Don't forget- sometimes Bing imagery is not
PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http
discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness ? impatience ? hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
here is what frederik has to say. His endorsement is good enough for me
Forwarded Message
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org
Cc: t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688)
( http://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/josm-snapshot-3688.jar )
and an updated version of the slippy map plugin. Then go to Preferences
(F12) Slippy map and
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
Yes, see http://opengeodata.org/microsoft-imagery-details.
Richard Fairhurst, seems to be in closer
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:07 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be
used
in
JOSM.
and it is legal to use it?
Yes, see
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:07 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 12:26 +0100, Sebastian Klein wrote:
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be
used
Hi,
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Adding source tags never hurts. I believe source=bing is what is sort of
agreed upon.
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl |
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at
Am Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2010 schrieb Jo:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to be added, but I managed to get it to work.
So now i'm mapping all those rivers/streams and the landuses that are
almost impossible to accomplish otherwise. Should I add source
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
Am Mittwoch 01 Dezember 2010 schrieb Jo:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to be added, but I managed to get it to work.
So now i'm mapping all those rivers/streams and the landuses that are
almost impossible to accomplish otherwise. Should I add source
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the
On 1 December 2010 14:55, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs
to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 14:55, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source needs
to
be added, but I managed to get it to
On 01.12.2010 13:59, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Adding source tags never hurts. I believe source=bing is what is sort
of agreed upon.
Is source=bing verified?
Else it is pretty bad to start mapping
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Is source=bing verified?
Else it is pretty bad to start mapping
As already posted, there is no formal requirement in the Bing licence to use
a source tag, but it's good OSM practice anyway. FWIW Potlatch 2 has
source=Bing as the preset tag.
Richard
--
View this
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:26 +0200, Nic Roets wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
It was posted by Steve Coast, Chairman of OSMF and a Microsoft
employee. So
the chances of Microsoft suing us for taking that info at face value
is
zero.
well the
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
your endorsement would be good enough for me
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Sebastian Klein wrote:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 1 December 2010 13:53, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote:
It works great, a bit odd that it's not under WMS that the source
needs to
be added, but I managed to get it to work.
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
Kenneth,
On 12/02/2010 04:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose viewpoint would you like?
your endorsement would be good enough
On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 08:52 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Kenneth,
On 12/02/2010 04:22 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:40 +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 12/01/10 13:14, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
this is not an OSM site - where is the OSM viewpoint on this?
Whose
-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688)
( http://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/josm-snapshot-3688.jar
.
Frank
- Forwarded message from basti...@googlemail.com -
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
thanks to fast development by Ian Dees, Bing imagery can now be used in
JOSM.
You'll need the latest version of josm (3688
basti...@googlemail.com -
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:26:59 +0100
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Reply-To: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
To: josm-...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
gebouwen vormen mooie referentiepunten. Ik hoop dat de Bing laag (kan
nog niet kijken hoe dit geïmplementeerd is) op dezelfde manier
verschoven kan worden.
Via de slippymapplugin kOn je niet verschuiven, maar wie weet is dat in de
versie met Bing support wel geregeld. Hopelijk.
Ik heb het
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost over het gebruik van Bing via de WMS plugin:
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
html:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wmsplugin/VirtualEarthSat.html?
This lets you
: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 1:17 PM
To: talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Wel erg gaaf zeg.
IK WIL AAN DE SLAG, Ahh
Wie kan mij vertellen hoe ik die kaart in JOSM als SlippyMap kan
verschuiven ten opzichte van de
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost over het gebruik van Bing via de WMS plugin:
Instead of slippmymap plugin you can use (although it's much slower)
the wmsplugin with the following url:
html:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wmsplugin/VirtualEarthSat.html?
Let wel op
helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op talk werd net gepost
2010/12/1 Robert Elsenaar rob...@elsenaar.info
Ik heb overigens in Spasnje langs de Costa Brava gekeken en daar merkte ik
op dat de low level images er nog niert zijn, of niet weergegeven worden. Er
komt dan een fototoestel te staan op een grijs vlak. Jammer.
Er zijn niet wereldwijd hoge
me hiermee helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds niet.
Op
me hiermee helpen?
/Blij
Groet
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Lennard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 2:18 PM
To: OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in
JOSM
Het kan volgens mij nog steeds
: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
2010/12/1
the environment.*
*Van:* talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:
talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org] *Namens *Martijn van Exel
*Verzonden:* Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:45 PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now
Exel
*Verzonden:* Wednesday, December 01, 2010 7:45 PM
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL discussion list
*Onderwerp:* Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Bing imagery now available
in JOSM
Ik ook! Keyboard shortcuts FTW!
Martijn
Martijn van Exel +++ m...@rtijn.org
laziness – impatience – hubris
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:36 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is it explicitly forbidden in their
TCs?
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still be
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still
be forbidden.
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
John Smith wrote:
--- On Wed, 5/8/09, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't need to be explicitly forbidden for it to still
be forbidden.
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
These are from Multimap, and if you click the TCs on the bing mapping
page it takes you to
John Smith wrote:
Is it forbidden, explicitly or otherwise?
Yes. Unless it's explicitly permitted, it's forbidden.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2009/8/5 maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com:
I hope they do, they have several areas with high-res that are not
covered in yahoo! in the Philippines
While Ms's and Multimap's reputation is that they would not allow that
if they have this option (Microsoft is a coin operated machine),
David Earl david at frankieandshadow.com writes:
These are from Multimap, and if you click the TCs on the bing mapping
page it takes you to Multimap's TC's:
http://www.multimap.com/about/legal_and_copyright/
and the imagery (Birds Eye View) is explicitly marked as copyright
below the
2009/8/5 Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi:
and the imagery (Birds Eye View) is explicitly marked as copyright
below the image.
Seems pretty explicit to me.
Sure, if the aim is to copy the images. It is not so clear if the aim is to
interpret the imagery and make a map from the
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is it explicitly forbidden in their TCs?
Just announced by Microsoft, a new round of imagery update for Bing Map
(previously known as Virtual Earth): 41TB. From the blog entry: We
I hope they do, they have several areas with high-res that are not
covered in yahoo! in the Philippines
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:36 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I know google forbids it, but I haven't heard about MS/Bing... Have they
disallowed use of their sat imagery or is
53 matches
Mail list logo
