On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 01:35:41PM +, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 11:49, Richard wrote:
> >this one problem could be (somewhat) solved by conditional restrictions,
>
> No, this is not an access restriction - people are allowed to go there
> whenever they like; it might just not be adv
On 05/03/2018 11:49, Richard wrote:
this one problem could be (somewhat) solved by conditional restrictions,
No, this is not an access restriction - people are allowed to go there
whenever they like; it might just not be advisable.
I'd be against mapping non-quantifiable risks like this beca
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 12:19:19PM +, Ben Oliver wrote:
> Surely then that is enough and we shouldn't need to flag 'dangerous' areas?
many other things can also be decuded like this and we still prefer to
tag them explicitly.
If someone wants to tag it I am against disallowing it for politica
On 18-03-05 13:00:10, Richard wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:10:40AM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Besides the verifiability problem, such tagging would discriminate one
demographic group against another, and increase the cultural bias in OSM.
where does such political correctness end? Conside
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:10:40AM +0100, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Besides the verifiability problem, such tagging would discriminate one
> demographic group against another, and increase the cultural bias in OSM.
where does such political correctness end? Consider that mapping
brothels, landfills,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 11:23:27PM -0600, Rodrigo Rodríguez wrote:
> I know I could map if the streets are well iluminated or how is their
> surface, but that's not enough to what happens on those streets (gangs
> and violence, for example). I could also use the class=bicycle tag and
> "hack" a ro
On 27.02.2018 12:58, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Mapping perceived danger has been discussed some years ago, and AFAIR wasn't considered to be
verifiable. Tried to find the discussion but couldn't, you might try yourself with your favorite
search engine.
It was on the tagging list, see the star
2018-03-05 7:57 GMT+01:00 Maarten Deen :
> On 2018-03-05 06:23, Rodrigo Rodríguez wrote:
>
>> These are sort of the things I would appreciate I could be able to
>> map in OSM. Even with the subjective point of view that might
>> represent to tag a way as insecure or not, it is easily achievable to
On 2018-03-05 06:23, Rodrigo Rodríguez wrote:
These are sort of the things I would appreciate I could be able to
map in OSM. Even with the subjective point of view that might
represent to tag a way as insecure or not, it is easily achievable to
determine a way or schema in wich you could identify
These are sort of the things I would appreciate I could be able to map
in OSM. Even with the subjective point of view that might represent to
tag a way as insecure or not, it is easily achievable to determine a way
or schema in wich you could identify wether a street is safe to walk or
pass through
Mapping perceived danger has been discussed some years ago, and AFAIR
wasn't considered to be verifiable. Tried to find the discussion but
couldn't, you might try yourself with your favorite search engine.
Cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openst
I came across an interesting node while correcting map errors. Thoughts on something like this? Delete it? Modify it? Does OSM care to map this type of local information?https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=4602572938#map=20/21.01482/-101.25210The note; "Peligroso en la noche o para mujeres sola
12 matches
Mail list logo
