> I'm not sure if there is anywhere that would be: (5) 3 options male,
> female & unisex (unisex=yes male=yes female=yes)
>
What about something I see fairly often at airports? A large women's
restroom, a large men's restroom, and a single-stall "family" restroom?
_
On 25/04/18 19:58, Michael Reichert wrote:
> Your proposed redefinition of unisex=yes would change the meaning of
> an established and highly used tag. Please invent new tags.
This isn't redefining, to quote the wiki unisex=yes means "denotes that
access is unrestricted by a person's sex or gender.
Hi Rory,
Am 2018-04-24 um 18:27 schrieb Rory McCann:
> But I don't think that's how "unisex=yes" been used in OSM. The wiki
> page says "unisex=yes" is a shorthand for "male=yes female=yes". The
> JOSM validator used to suggest that replacement, until I filed a bug[2].
> iD's preset has 3 mutually
(a) This is OSM, if it exists, we map it. 😁😁 Gender neutral vs. gender
segregated toilets exist. So how do we map that?
(b) Many people benefit from gender neutral toilets: Gender
non-conforming people, some trans people, people with carers of a
different gender. Mapping these facilities allows t
not only that, bit generally in North America, men's washrooms are usually
dirtier than woamns washrooms
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 2:46 PM Kathleen Lu, wrote:
> I think the most likely application may be the other way around, where
> transgender individuals concerned about harassment may purposefull
I think the most likely application may be the other way around, where
transgender individuals concerned about harassment may purposefully seek
out restrooms that are designated unisex in order to reduce the chances of
encountering someone who might challenge whether they are using the
"correct" re
Hi,
On 04/24/2018 08:02 PM, Tobias Zwick wrote:
> Why do you think it necessary to map at all if any particular toilet is
> segregated or not beyond whether I can go there as a man/woman? What is
> the application?
I know people of both standard genders who would prefer using a toilet
that is for
Why do you think it necessary to map at all if any particular toilet is
segregated or not beyond whether I can go there as a man/woman? What is
the application?
On 24/04/2018 18:27, Rory McCann wrote:
> Hi all,
> Let's have a wee talk about how should one map gender neutral (and
> gender segregat
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:27:02 +0200
Rory McCann wrote:
> Thoughts? Feedback? Anything I'm missing?
Note that defining tag with proposal on wiki will not change existing
data or immediately change how people understand tag.
I was not investigating the situation in this case but have you
considere
Hi all,
Let's have a wee talk about how should one map gender neutral (and
gender segregated) toilets. There is a unisex=yes for toilets which
looks like it might be the number one tag to use. The bog standard
meaning of "unisex toilet"[1] is a gender neutral toilet, i.e. not
segregated into sepa
10 matches
Mail list logo
