Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-25 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi Blake 2016-03-24 16:01 GMT+01:00 Blake Girardot : > > We run into geojson all the time as an interchange format. I can imagine. Reaffirm this at https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10564 so people believe us. > I was not aware of the plugin somehow, but I just tried it

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-24 Thread Blake Girardot
We run into geojson all the time as an interchange format. I was not aware of the plugin somehow, but I just tried it out and it worked fine for the geojson generated by Field Papers and another community member reports that she has used it a great deal with Field Papers and it worked great.

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-22 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi Frederik and Jukka Before I try give answers to performance let's be aware that we're (at least I am) speaking about a "desktop exchange format", not a storage fomat for GIS processing. But Frederik's comment piqued my curiosity and I did some quick comparison. I generated 1 mio. records in

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-22 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Frederik Ramm remote.org> writes: > > Hi, > > On 03/20/2016 10:56 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > > But Shapefile remains an oldtimer with more drawbacks than limited > > field names; see [1]. > > GeoJSON (ascii) and GeoPackages (binary) are formats which are more > > suited for the job. > > I

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-21 Thread Mike Thompson
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Christoph Hormann wrote: > > The general problem with SQLite based files is that they are always read > and written through the SQLite database engine which is not > particularly good for sequential write and read operations. In my

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-21 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 21 March 2016, Stefan Keller wrote: > > I'm not sure if Geopackage has significant performance improvements > > over simple Spatialite but if it hasn't then my recommendation for > > simple GIS processing is certainly to stick with shape files for > > the time being - despite all their

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-21 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi, 2016-03-21 17:33 GMT+01:00 Frederik Ramm : > I'm not sure if Geopackage has significant performance improvements over > simple Spatialite but if it hasn't then my recommendation for simple GIS > processing is certainly to stick with shape files for the time being - >

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-21 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/20/2016 10:56 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > But Shapefile remains an oldtimer with more drawbacks than limited > field names; see [1]. > GeoJSON (ascii) and GeoPackages (binary) are formats which are more > suited for the job. > I still have hope that JOSM will be able to read those vector

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-20 Thread Stefan Keller
His Stefan Nice hack! But Shapefile remains an oldtimer with more drawbacks than limited field names; see [1]. GeoJSON (ascii) and GeoPackages (binary) are formats which are more suited for the job. I still have hope that JOSM will be able to read those vector formats too. :Stefan [1]

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-20 Thread Stefan Baebler
Hi! On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Stefan Keller wrote: > > I of course know Shapefiles but they are deprecated because e.g. they > cut-off field names at 10 chars. GeoJSON or GeoPackage are better > alternatives. > For RABA-KGZ landuse import in Slovenia we pushed the-10

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-07 Thread Stefan Keller
Hi Jan Many thanks for this status update of the GeoJSON plugin code and to ogr2osm. My use case is that I have to postprocess admin. boundaries from the cadastre/topogr. bureau in order to produce a background layer (to JOSM) which indicates boundaries which have been deleted/moved/added.

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-07 Thread Ian Dees
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > To Ian and/or anybody > > I'm searching a plugin to import GeoJSON vector data into JOSM. > > I of course know Shapefiles but they are deprecated because e.g. they > cut-off field names at 10 chars. GeoJSON or GeoPackage

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-07 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Stefan Keller gmail.com> writes: > > To Ian and/or anybody > > I'm searching a plugin to import GeoJSON vector data into JOSM. > > I of course know Shapefiles but they are deprecated because e.g. they > cut-off field names at 10 chars. GeoJSON or GeoPackage are better > alternatives. > > Is

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-07 Thread Felix Delattre
This won't help. But to give yoy some context: There is a "won't fix" request ticket for JOSM to support GeoJSON: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10564 Best, Felix On 06/03/16 00:56, Stefan Keller wrote: > To Ian and/or anybody > > I'm searching a plugin to import GeoJSON vector data into

[OSM-talk] JOSM plugin to import GeoJSON?

2016-03-05 Thread Stefan Keller
To Ian and/or anybody I'm searching a plugin to import GeoJSON vector data into JOSM. I of course know Shapefiles but they are deprecated because e.g. they cut-off field names at 10 chars. GeoJSON or GeoPackage are better alternatives. Is this plugin still maintained: