On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> * though with NPE the reasonably large area is pretty clearly going to
> be talk-gb, not talk :p
Ok, good point :)
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nexusuk.org/
Servatis a periculum, servatis a malefi
Steve Hill wrote:
> * the changes cover a reasonably large area and thus a large number of
> editors are affected and may wish to contribute to the discussion.
* though with NPE the reasonably large area is pretty clearly going to
be talk-gb, not talk :p
Seriously, it wasn't solely directed at
Barnett, Phillip wrote:
> From my local knowledge of some parts of Wales, I'd agree strongly
> that NPE names are _frequently_ incorrect compared with modern
> labelling of towns/villages and other features, and are hence Not To
> Be Trusted
Though if you understand something about Welsh
Steve Hill wrote:
> Something that would be very useful in Potlatch would be the ability to
> have the background zoom beyond it's highest resolution and just get
> interpolated to fit - the yahoo images are virtually unusable in Wales and
> over-zooming them might make them a bit more useful.
Th
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> * you suspect that the criticism you have is not shared by everyone
> so you want to give them a chance to voice their opinion;
> * you think that whatever you're unhappy with is not only done by one
> mapper, but general practice (or might become genera
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Steve Chilton wrote:
> As Andy notes it is not always easy to see small sections of data at z14
> in Potlatch (which you have to use for NPE work).
No problem - I just thought I'd mention that some on-the-ground review is
needed for these waterways at some point (although it
>From my local knowledge of some parts of Wales, I'd agree strongly that NPE
>names are _frequently_ incorrect compared with modern labelling of
>towns/villages and other features, and are hence Not To Be Trusted
Eg The mid-Wales town called Dolgelley from NPE and Dolgellau in Real Life
I'm n
Hi,
> On a slight etiquettey note I'd suggest that using the messaging
> system, rather than public lists, is a really great way to get in
> contact with people about their mapping work.
Unless of course
* you suspect that the criticism you have is not shared by everyone
so you want to give th
> [snip]
On a slight etiquettey note I'd suggest that using the messaging
system, rather than public lists, is a really great way to get in
contact with people about their mapping work.
Steve Chilton wrote:
> Finally, it is my view that source=NPE is implicitly tagging "for
> review".
+1
c
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Robinson
(blackadder-lists)
Sent: 23 July 2008 11:50
To: 'Steve Hill'; talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] NPE waterways
Steve,
Steve Chilton has been adding all those welsh streams, p
Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Hill
>Sent: 23 July 2008 11:40 AM
>To: talk@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: [OSM-talk] NPE waterways
>
>
>I noticed that a lot of waterways have recently been added with
>source=NPE.
I noticed that a lot of waterways have recently been added with
source=NPE. Were these traced, or was this an automated import?
It seems that some of the existing (surveyed) work has been either ignored
or broken in the process. i.e.:
An existing section of stream with a bridge over it has b
12 matches
Mail list logo
