On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:42:55AM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
2008/5/8 Christoph Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those who think the RFC/vote process represents the
consensus on how things should be done, what needs to happen to
change that process?
IMO map features should be
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:01:33AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
That sounds eminently sensible, and in general I agree with your
proposals. For those who think the RFC/vote process represents the
consensus on how things should be done, what needs to happen to
Christoph Eckert wrote:
IMO map features should be built on top of tagwatch. This way tagging
recommendations would be built on top what's actually used. Much more
democratic than the current process IMO :) .
Tagwatch tells you what is. It cannot by itself tell you what should be.
It could
Gervase Markham wrote:
Lastly, it cannot tell you if 50% of people are using foo=bar to mean
one thing, and the other 50% are using it to mean something else. Tags
do not contain all of their semantics in their names.
It also can't tell you when different tags mean the same thing. If 50%
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:01:33AM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
* Some people started tagging *and rendering* crossings, using a
particular tagging scheme.
* Some other people, who weren't actually out doing the work, started
complaining about what was going on [1]
May I take this
Hi,
For those who think the RFC/vote process represents the
consensus on how things should be done, what needs to happen to
change that process?
IMO map features should be built on top of tagwatch. This way tagging
recommendations would be built on top what's actually used. Much more
2008/5/8 Christoph Eckert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For those who think the RFC/vote process represents the
consensus on how things should be done, what needs to happen to
change that process?
IMO map features should be built on top of tagwatch. This way tagging
recommendations would be
2008/5/7 Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
using tagwatch is a good idea as a basis for proposals, but problems
arise when we have two ways of tagging the same type of item. how does
anyone decide which should be used? one must be more optimal than the
other. having two methods running
2008/5/8 DavidD [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/5/7 Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
using tagwatch is a good idea as a basis for proposals, but problems
arise when we have two ways of tagging the same type of item. how does
anyone decide which should be used? one must be more optimal than
9 matches
Mail list logo