On 2011-06-15 04:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
As far as I know, I have probably contributed data in the following
circumstances:
*Mapper A who has not accepted the change to ODbL drew two intersecting
roads.
*I note in person that there is a recently-added island-separated
right-turn lane, and I
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
On 2011-06-15 04:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
As far as I know, I have probably contributed data in the following
circumstances:
*Mapper A who has not accepted the change to ODbL drew two intersecting
roads.
*I note in person that there is a recently-added
On 2011-06-16 13:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
On 2011-06-15 04:01, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
As far as I know, I have probably contributed data in the following
circumstances:
*Mapper A who has not accepted the change to ODbL drew two intersecting
roads.
*I note in
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
How did you noticed that there is a right-way turn lane? Probably not by
looking on the OSM map because then it would have been already there. So
you have another source (local knowledge, bing, ...) from which you got
the location of this way - you derived the
On 2011-06-16 15:48, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
How did you noticed that there is a right-way turn lane? Probably not by
looking on the OSM map because then it would have been already there. So
you have another source (local knowledge, bing, ...) from which you got
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
On 2011-06-16 15:48, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Andreas Perstinger wrote:
How did you noticed that there is a right-way turn lane? Probably not
by
looking on the OSM map because then it would have been already there.
So
you have another source (local knowledge,
2011/6/16 Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net:
If there is just *one* single object near your way which isn't based on a
ccbysa node/way, then you could always argue IMHO that you've measured the
location of your way from this object (JOSM has a measurement tool with you
can use for
2011/6/16 Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net:
If there is just *one* single object near your way which isn't based on a
ccbysa node/way, then you could always argue IMHO that you've measured the
location of your way from this object (JOSM has a measurement tool with you
can use for
On 2011-06-16 18:51, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/16 Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net:
If there is just *one* single object near your way which isn't based on a
ccbysa node/way, then you could always argue IMHO that you've measured the
location of your way from this object
On 2011-06-16 19:15, David Earl wrote:
2011/6/16 Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net:
If there is just *one* single object near your way which isn't based on a
ccbysa node/way, then you could always argue IMHO that you've measured the
location of your way from this object (JOSM has
I've read the current version of the contributor terms and have a question:
If you contribute Contents, You are indicating that, as far as You
know, You have the right to authorize OSMF to use and distribute those
Contents under our current licence terms.
As far as I know, I have probably
11 matches
Mail list logo
